Final04/04/2025
Semi-finals01/04/2025–02/04/2025
Quarter-finals25/03/2025–27/03/2025
Results19/03/2025–24/03/2025
Mon 24/03Stanford
75–77
Kent State
Mon 24/03Santa Clara
84–88
UAB
Mon 24/03UC Irvine
66–61
Jacksonville State
Sun 23/03North Texas
65–63
Arkansas State
Sun 23/03San Francisco
76–77
Loyola Chicago
Sun 23/03SMU Mustangs
83–85
Oklahoma State
Sat 22/03George Mason
67–75
Bradley
Sat 22/03Chattanooga Mocs
87–72
Dayton
Thu 20/03San Francisco
79–70
Utah Valley State
Thu 20/03San Jose State
70–73
Loyola Chicago
Thu 20/03UC Irvine
82–72
Northern Colorado
Thu 20/03SMU Mustangs
73–63
Northern Iowa
Thu 20/03Bradley
71–62
North Alabama
Thu 20/03North Texas
75–64
Furman
Wed 19/03Dayton
86–79
Florida Atlantic
Wed 19/03George Mason
86–69
Samford
Wed 19/03Saint Josephs Hawks
65–69
UAB
Wed 19/03Santa Clara
101–62
UC Riverside
Team Stats
Side-by-side performance comparison of all 31 teams in the NIT. Chattanooga Mocs leads with 3 wins this season. The colour-coded heatmap highlights wins, losses, scoring, scoring difference, and win percentage — making it easy to spot the strongest and weakest teams at a glance for betting analysis.
Top Scoring Teams
| Team | # | Played | Won | Lost | Points For | Points Against | Avg W | Avg L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Played3 | 3 | Lost0 | Points For234 | Points Against210 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 2 | Played3 | 3 | Lost0 | Points For217 | Points Against200 | Avg W0.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 3 | Played4 | 3 | Lost1 | Points For268 | Points Against255 | Avg W1.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 4 | Played4 | 3 | Lost1 | Points For295 | Points Against288 | Avg W0.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 5 | Played3 | 2 | Lost1 | Points For211 | Points Against196 | Avg W1.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 6 | Played3 | 2 | Lost1 | Points For214 | Points Against203 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 7 | Played3 | 2 | Lost1 | Points For233 | Points Against223 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 8 | Played2 | 2 | Lost0 | Points For157 | Points Against149 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 9 | Played2 | 1 | Lost1 | Points For185 | Points Against150 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 10 | Played2 | 1 | Lost1 | Points For166 | Points Against143 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 11 | Played2 | 1 | Lost1 | Points For162 | Points Against147 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 12 | Played2 | 1 | Lost1 | Points For142 | Points Against130 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 13 | Played2 | 1 | Lost1 | Points For153 | Points Against144 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 14 | Played2 | 1 | Lost1 | Points For156 | Points Against148 | Avg W0.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 15 | Played2 | 1 | Lost1 | Points For155 | Points Against147 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 16 | Played2 | 1 | Lost1 | Points For158 | Points Against166 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 17 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For70 | Points Against73 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 18 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For65 | Points Against69 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 19 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For79 | Points Against86 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 20 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For70 | Points Against79 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 21 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For62 | Points Against71 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 22 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For79 | Points Against89 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 23 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For72 | Points Against82 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 24 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For63 | Points Against73 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 25 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For64 | Points Against75 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 26 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For70 | Points Against87 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 27 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For69 | Points Against86 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 28 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For64 | Points Against81 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 29 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For56 | Points Against75 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 30 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For78 | Points Against103 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 31 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For62 | Points Against101 | Avg W— | Avg L— |
API data: 12 May 2026