17 April 2026 at 16:00

21
Full Time

Match Summary

AEL defeated Enosis 2:1. The match was played in 1. Division 2025. Goals were scored by L. Singh 81′ (pen.), A. Makris 90′, A. Ella 90′. 3 yellow cards were shown. AEL made 5 substitutions, Enosis made 5.

Match Events

Key match events between AEL and Enosis — 3 goals and 3 cards recorded during the match.

AEL
Enosis
Kick Off
Half Time
D. ZdravkovskiN. Glavcic
46′
A. Panagiotou FiliotisSergio Conceicao
46′
D. ParoutisL. Singh
64′
F. R. MugheT. Maseko
64′
70′
S. RisvanisJ. Okeke
75′
A. KatsiarisS. Solomou
75′
M. SimonovskiA. Ella
B. Z. JradiZ. Sawo
78′
L. Singh

Penalty

81′
82′
J. KazanC. Kyzas
82′
G. KurezD. Solomou
90′
Full Time

Lineups

AEL lined up in a 4-4-2 formation under Hugo Martins, while Enosis deployed a 4-4-2 under Damir Canadi.

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for AEL is 6.87, compared to 6.54 for Enosis. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. AEL's highest-rated starter is C. Frantzis (7.40), while Enosis's best-rated player is P. Panagiotou (7.03).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of AEL have contributed 3 goals and 2 assists this season, led by A. Makris (2G). Enosis's starters account for 0 goals and 0 assists, spearheaded by —. Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

AEL deploy 2 defenders rated 7.26 on average, against Enosis's 3-man backline averaging 6.46. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

AEL field 8 midfielders averaging 6.71, versus Enosis's 5 rated 6.46. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

AEL start 0 forward(s) averaging —, compared to 2 for Enosis averaging 6.62. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 77% for AEL and 76% for Enosis. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

AEL's starters have collected 20 yellow cards this season, compared to 30 for Enosis. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of AEL's starting XI is 26.3 (youngest: P. Kyriakou (21), oldest: B. Z. Jradi (32)), while Enosis average 28.2 (youngest: J. Kazan (18), oldest: E. Sakic (34)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

AEL's starters average 16 league appearances each, versus 16 for Enosis. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

AEL4-4-24-4-2Enosis
GKDEFMIDFWD
98Kyriakou25Filiotis2Frantzis21Bogdan19Milosav.63Mughe6Zdravko.37Szoke29Paroutis33Makris10Jradi1Panagio.47Kozar4Ioannou33Risvanis66Sakic11Kurez14Kosmas18Katsiar.27Kazan99Charala.9Simonov.

Substitutes

Coach: Hugo Martins

Substitutes

Coach: Damir Canadi

AELPosition StrengthEnosis
6.87
Avg Rating
6.54
7.15Goalkeeper (1 v 1)7.03
0G 0A0G 0A
7.26Defender (2 v 3)6.46
1G 0A0G 0A
6.71Midfielder (8 v 5)6.46
2G 2A0G 0A
Forward (0 v 2)6.62
0G 0A
AEL4-4-2
98GoalkeeperP. Kyriakou7.2
2DefenderC. Frantzis7.41G
21DefenderL. Bogdan7.1
25MidfielderA. Panagiotou Filiotis
19MidfielderI. Milosavljevic6.61A
63MidfielderF. R. Mughe7.11A
6MidfielderD. Zdravkovski6.8
37MidfielderJ. Szoke6.7
29MidfielderD. Paroutis6.8
33MidfielderA. Makris6.62G
10MidfielderB. Z. Jradi6.5
Enosis4-4-2
1GoalkeeperP. Panagiotou7.0
4DefenderS. Ioannou6.2
33DefenderS. Risvanis6.7
66DefenderE. Sakic6.5
47MidfielderA. Kozar5.9
11MidfielderG. Kurez6.7
14MidfielderL. Kosmas6.5
18MidfielderA. Katsiaris6.7
27MidfielderJ. Kazan6.6
99ForwardM. Charalampous6.4
9ForwardM. Simonovski6.8

Recent Form

In their last 6 matches, AEL have recorded 2 wins, 1 draws and 3 defeats. Enosis show 1 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses from their last 6 outings.

AEL

WLWDLL

Enosis

LLWLLL

AEL vs Enosis Head to Head Results

AEL and Enosis have met 3 times — AEL won 2, Enosis won 0, with 1 draws. Their rivalry dates back to 2025. AEL leads the head-to-head with 2 victories from 3 meetings. A combined 7 goals have been scored across these fixtures, averaging 2.33 per match (6 for the home side, 1 for the visitors). Both teams scored in 1 matches (33%). Over 2.5 goals landed in 1 games (33%), making it a fixture that tends to produce goals. AEL are currently unbeaten in the last 3 meetings. The highest-scoring encounter finished 3–0 in 2025.

2

AEL

1

Drawn

0

Enosis

Goals: 6Goals: 1

Recent Meetings (3)

20 Feb 2026Enosis0 – 2AEL
7 Nov 2025AEL3 – 0Enosis
8 Aug 2025AEL1 – 1Enosis
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 19 Apr 2026