Menu

Stj Rdals Blink vs Ham Kam

MUS Stadion Sandskogan, Stjørdal30 August 2020 at 14:00

Match Events

Stjørdals-Blink
Ham-Kam
Kick Off
K. Rolstad26′
40′M. Pedersen
Half Time
49′
M. Pedersen
K. RolstadP. Hjelmseth
54′
V. FiskeF. Vinje
61′
M. AugdalT. Hestad
61′
63′
J. EnkerudE. Sildnes
L. BransdalJ. Skille
73′
O. RødahlS. Halgunset
73′
74′K. Strande
77′
T. SvendsenA. Dieserud
84′
K. StrandeS. Pedersen
90+1′M. Pedersen
90+1′M. Pedersen
90+5′L. Jendal
Full Time

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Stjørdals-Blink is 6.59, compared to — for Ham-Kam. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Stjørdals-Blink's highest-rated starter is K. Rolstad (6.59), while Ham-Kam's best-rated player is —.

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Stjørdals-Blink have contributed 1 goals and 0 assists this season, led by K. Rolstad (1G). Ham-Kam's starters account for 0 goals and 0 assists, spearheaded by —. Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Midfield Control

Stjørdals-Blink field 11 midfielders averaging 6.59, versus Ham-Kam's 11 rated —. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 71% for Stjørdals-Blink and —% for Ham-Kam. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Stjørdals-Blink's starters have collected 2 yellow cards this season, compared to 0 for Ham-Kam. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Stjørdals-Blink's starting XI is 24.0 (youngest: K. Rolstad (24), oldest: K. Rolstad (24)), while Ham-Kam average 31.0 (youngest: K. Onsrud (31), oldest: K. Onsrud (31)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Stjørdals-Blink's starters average 11 league appearances each, versus 0 for Ham-Kam. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Stjørdals-BlinkPosition StrengthHam-Kam
6.59
Avg Rating
6.59Midfielder (11 v 11)
1G 0A0G 0A
Stjørdals-Blink
1MidfielderN. Frenderup
29MidfielderR. Bjørnholm-Jatta
15MidfielderV. Fiske
32MidfielderO. Rødahl
8MidfielderS. Kartum
7MidfielderM. Augdal
5MidfielderA. Nygaard
45MidfielderK. Rolstad6.61G
11MidfielderJ. Olufsen
10MidfielderS. Stokke
25MidfielderL. Bransdal
Ham-Kam
1MidfielderL. Jendal
20MidfielderJ. Matland
5MidfielderS. Strømnes
13MidfielderRubén Alegre
17MidfielderK. Strande
9MidfielderJ. Enkerud
22MidfielderK. Onsrud
21MidfielderT. Svendsen
8MidfielderM. Solbakken
15MidfielderV. Skjærvik
11MidfielderM. Pedersen

Match Summary

Ham-Kam defeated Stjørdals-Blink 1:0. The match was played in 1. Division 2020. Goals were scored by M. Pedersen 49′. 5 yellow cards were shown, 1 red cards. Stjørdals-Blink made 5 substitutions, Ham-Kam made 3.

Rivalry since 2020

Stjørdals-Blink vs Ham-Kam Head to Head Results

3 stretnutí
Stjørdals-Blink
0
wins
Drawn
1
Ham-Kam
2
wins
Total goals
8 · 2.7/match
Both scored
1/3 · 33%
Over 2.5
2/3 · 67%

Recent Form

Stjørdals-Blink

LLLWWL

Ham-Kam

LWLWWW

Match Prediction

Stjørdals-Blink

45%

Home win

 

45%

Draw

Ham-Kam

10%

Away win

Model advice

Combo Double chance : Stjørdals-Blink or draw and +1.5 goals

62%Form38%
50%Attack50%
63%Defence38%
0%Head-to-head0%
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026