AEL vs Enosis

Full Time

1. Division · Season 2020

Tsirion Athlítiko Kentro, Lemesós19 October 2020 at 18:00

Home

Match Events

AEL

Enosis

Kick Off

S. Medojević

6′

⚽

Sito Riera

16′

⚽

V. Papafotis

24′

⚽

34′Irakli Maisuradze

⚽

38′

Alves

Penalty

Half Time

46′

▲ D. Theodorou▼ C. Udoji

▲ V. Papafotis▼ G. Ghazaryan

64′

65′Emanuel Dening

G. Ghazaryan

70′

⚽

71′

▲ A. Kyriakou▼ K. Irep

▲ Danilo▼ D. Zdravkovski

74′

Momcilo Rašo75′

▲ R. Mmaee▼ M. Babić

77′

▲ A. Lucero▼ K. Panayi

Sito Riera81′

81′Chigozie Udoji

Full Time

Match Statistics

0Shots on Goal0

0Shots off Goal0

0Total Shots0

0Blocked Shots0

0Shots insidebox0

0Shots outsidebox0

0Fouls0

5Corner Kicks4

0Offsides0

0Ball Possession0

2Yellow Cards3

0Red Cards0

0Goalkeeper Saves0

0Total passes0

0Passes accurate0

0Passes %0

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for AEL is 6.43, compared to — for Enosis. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. AEL's highest-rated starter is V. Papafotis (6.43), while Enosis's best-rated player is —.

Defensive Solidity

AEL deploy 4 defenders rated — on average, against Enosis's 3-man backline averaging —. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

AEL field 5 midfielders averaging 6.43, versus Enosis's 4 rated —. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

AEL start 1 forward(s) averaging —, compared to 3 for Enosis averaging —. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 69% for AEL and —% for Enosis. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Age & Experience

The average age of AEL's starting XI is 30.0 (youngest: V. Papafotis (30), oldest: V. Papafotis (30)), while Enosis average — (youngest: —, oldest: —). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

AEL's starters average 11 league appearances each, versus 0 for Enosis. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

AEL4-1-4-14-2-3-1Enosis

GKDEFMIDFWD

Substitutes

Coach: D. Kerkez

Substitutes

Coach: Carlos Alós

AELPosition StrengthEnosis

6.43

Avg Rating

—

6.43Midfielder (5 v 4)—

0G 0A0G 0A

AEL4-1-4-1

1GoalkeeperVózinha—

28DefenderG. Bunoza—

31DefenderBruno Santos—

27DefenderM. Rašo—

40DefenderC. Kyriakou—

6MidfielderS. Medojević—

11MidfielderSito Riera—

90MidfielderDanilo—

16MidfielderManuel Torres—

23MidfielderV. Papafotis6.4

14ForwardR. Mmaee—

Enosis4-2-3-1

90GoalkeeperF. Gachevski—

46DefenderG. Balažic—

6DefenderP. van Anholt—

45DefenderA. Kyriakou—

18MidfielderD. Barboza—

28MidfielderI. Maisuradze—

7MidfielderA. Lucero—

70MidfielderAlves—

11ForwardD. Theodorou—

10ForwardE. Dening—

99ForwardI. Markovskyi—

Match Summary

AEL defeated Enosis 4:1. The match was played in 1. Division 2020. Goals were scored by S. Medojević 6′, Sito Riera 16′, V. Papafotis 24′, Alves 38′ (pen.), G. Ghazaryan 70′. 5 yellow cards were shown. AEL made 3 substitutions, Enosis made 3.

Rivalry since 2018