Menu

Kfum Oslo vs Raufoss

Ekeberg Kunstgress, Oslo2 July 2021 at 17:00
32
Referee: E. Bodding

Match Events

KFUM Oslo
Raufoss
Kick Off
33′M. Alm
45′
E. Banza
Half Time
F. DahlC. Lindquist
46′
A. Sanyang
46′
R. Rasch51′
55′
M. KarlsbakkJ. Ørsal
T. Sørås
56′
68′
M. AlmM. Frankoch
68′
M. AaneslandA. Helmersen
R. RaschR. Svindland
69′
74′E. Race
A. SanyangJ. Moula
79′
80′S. Westerlund
82′
E. BanzaS. Werni
J. Taaje
85′
M. MahninH. Hoseth
87′
P. RomsaasK. Aarstad
87′
90+1′
E. Race
Full Time

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for KFUM Oslo is 7.40, compared to 6.54 for Raufoss. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. KFUM Oslo's highest-rated starter is R. Rasch (7.40), while Raufoss's best-rated player is N. Fremstad (6.59).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of KFUM Oslo have contributed 0 goals and 0 assists this season, led by —. Raufoss's starters account for 2 goals and 1 assists, spearheaded by M. Aanesland (2G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Midfield Control

KFUM Oslo field 11 midfielders averaging 7.40, versus Raufoss's 11 rated 6.54. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 56% for KFUM Oslo and 69% for Raufoss. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

KFUM Oslo's starters have collected 1 yellow cards this season, compared to 2 for Raufoss. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of KFUM Oslo's starting XI is 30.5 (youngest: D. Gaye (30), oldest: R. Rasch (31)), while Raufoss average 28.3 (youngest: N. Fremstad (27), oldest: O. Lauvli (31)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

KFUM Oslo's starters average 8 league appearances each, versus 9 for Raufoss. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

KFUM OsloPosition StrengthRaufoss
7.40
Avg Rating
6.54
7.40Midfielder (11 v 11)6.54
0G 0A2G 1A
KFUM Oslo
12MidfielderK. Skjærstein
3MidfielderD. Gaye
25MidfielderJ. Taaje
17MidfielderF. Dahl
5MidfielderA. Olsen
8MidfielderS. Sortevik
7MidfielderR. Rasch7.4
27MidfielderM. Mahnin
21MidfielderT. Sørås
19MidfielderP. Romsaas
10MidfielderA. Sanyang
Raufoss
1MidfielderO. Lauvli
2MidfielderE. Race
5MidfielderM. Alm
4MidfielderS. Westerlund
11MidfielderN. Fremstad6.6
22MidfielderM. Karlsbakk
21MidfielderH. Kleppa
24MidfielderE. Banza
15MidfielderM. Aanesland6.52G1A
10MidfielderT. Haltvik
28MidfielderM. Ndiaye

Match Summary

KFUM Oslo defeated Raufoss 3:2. The match was played in 1. Division 2021. Goals were scored by E. Banza 45′, A. Sanyang 46′, T. Sørås 56′, J. Taaje 85′, E. Race 90′. 4 yellow cards were shown. KFUM Oslo made 5 substitutions, Raufoss made 4.

Rivalry since 2016

KFUM Oslo vs Raufoss Head to Head Results

11 stretnutí
KFUM Oslo
3
wins
Drawn
3
Raufoss
5
wins
Total goals
34 · 3.1/match
Both scored
5/11 · 45%
Over 2.5
7/11 · 64%

Recent Form

KFUM Oslo

LLDLLD

Raufoss

DLWLLL

Match Prediction

KFUM Oslo

45%

Home win

 

45%

Draw

Raufoss

10%

Away win

Model advice

Double chance : KFUM Oslo or draw

56%Form44%
50%Attack50%
67%Defence33%
40%Head-to-head60%
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026