Menu

Start vs Kfum Oslo

Sparebanken Sør Arena, Kristiansand11 September 2021 at 14:00
Home

Start

23
Referee: M. Kellerhals

Match Events

Start
KFUM Oslo
Kick Off
E. Marković
10′
J. Tveita
14′
29′S. Sortevik
45+1′
J. Taaje
Half Time
L. MaresS. Sjøkvist
59′
67′J. Taaje
69′
P. RomsaasD. Tavakoli
72′
D. Tavakoli
76′
B. Njie
J. JørgensenM. Moldskred
77′
M. RamslandA. Akinyemi
77′
77′
S. SortevikT. Sørås
A. Tjærandsen-SkauC. Cresswell
86′
87′
B. NjieJ. Hummelvoll-Nunez
87′
R. SvindlandM. Mahnin
Full Time

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Start is 7.16, compared to 6.98 for KFUM Oslo. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Start's highest-rated starter is E. Schulze (7.16), while KFUM Oslo's best-rated player is R. Rasch (7.40).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Start have contributed 5 goals and 1 assists this season, led by E. Schulze (5G). KFUM Oslo's starters account for 1 goals and 1 assists, spearheaded by B. Njie (1G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Midfield Control

Start field 11 midfielders averaging 7.16, versus KFUM Oslo's 11 rated 6.98. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 73% for Start and 56% for KFUM Oslo. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Start's starters have collected 1 yellow cards this season, compared to 3 for KFUM Oslo. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Start's starting XI is 32.0 (youngest: E. Schulze (32), oldest: E. Schulze (32)), while KFUM Oslo average 28.0 (youngest: E. Ødegaard (26), oldest: R. Rasch (31)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Start's starters average 10 league appearances each, versus 17 for KFUM Oslo. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

StartPosition StrengthKFUM Oslo
7.16
Avg Rating
6.98
7.16Midfielder (11 v 11)6.98
5G 1A1G 1A
Start
12MidfielderA. Wichne
6MidfielderJ. Jørgensen
18MidfielderJ. Tveita
3MidfielderV. Bergan
22MidfielderK. Tønnessen
14MidfielderL. Mares
11MidfielderE. Schulze7.25G1A
8MidfielderK. Valsvik
10MidfielderE. Marković
28MidfielderA. Tjærandsen-Skau
9MidfielderM. Ramsland
KFUM Oslo
1MidfielderE. Ødegaard6.7
2MidfielderK. Ghaedamini
25MidfielderJ. Taaje
17MidfielderF. Dahl
5MidfielderA. Olsen
8MidfielderS. Sortevik
26MidfielderR. Svindland
7MidfielderR. Rasch7.4
19MidfielderP. Romsaas
11MidfielderB. Njie6.81G1A
10MidfielderA. Sanyang

Match Summary

KFUM Oslo defeated Start 3:2. The match was played in 1. Division 2021. Goals were scored by E. Marković 10′, J. Tveita 14′, J. Taaje 45′, D. Tavakoli 72′, B. Njie 76′. 2 yellow cards were shown. Start made 4 substitutions, KFUM Oslo made 4.

Rivalry since 2019

Start vs KFUM Oslo Head to Head Results

9 stretnutí
Start
6
wins
Drawn
3
KFUM Oslo
0
wins
Total goals
35 · 3.9/match
Both scored
6/9 · 67%
Over 2.5
5/9 · 56%

Recent Form

Start

WWDWDW

KFUM Oslo

LLDLLD

Match Prediction

Start

45%

Home win

 

45%

Draw

KFUM Oslo

10%

Away win

Model advice

Double chance : Start or draw

43%Form57%
56%Attack44%
43%Defence57%
88%Head-to-head13%
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026