Menu

Sogndal vs Egersund

Fosshaugane Campus, Sogndal25 October 2025 at 15:00
Home

Sogndal

01

Match Events

Sogndal
Egersund
Kick Off
31′C. Sleveland
Half Time
T. PippolaV. Hagen
46′
63′
M. Haheim-ElveseterP. Pichkah
M. HoylandF. Sturgeon
70′
73′
M. SauerN. Tornvig
75′
S. VatneK. Eggen
76′I. Jonsson
D. BrasR. Holten
84′
J. FlatenP. Asp
84′
86′
C. SlevelandP. Hovland
86′
O. KapskarmoF. Nyenetue
90′
F. Nyenetue

assist: N. Tornvig

Full Time

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Sogndal is 7.26, compared to 7.05 for Egersund. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Sogndal's highest-rated starter is L. Jendal (7.68), while Egersund's best-rated player is M. Sauer (7.23).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Sogndal have contributed 14 goals and 4 assists this season, led by O. Hintsa (7G). Egersund's starters account for 10 goals and 2 assists, spearheaded by M. Sauer (5G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Midfield Control

Sogndal field 11 midfielders averaging 7.26, versus Egersund's 11 rated 7.05. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 76% for Sogndal and 83% for Egersund. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Sogndal's starters have collected 17 yellow cards this season, compared to 3 for Egersund. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Sogndal's starting XI is 26.9 (youngest: L. Vapne (22), oldest: P. Flo (36)), while Egersund average 23.3 (youngest: A. Hermansen (21), oldest: I. Jonsson (26)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Sogndal's starters average 11 league appearances each, versus 11 for Egersund. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

SogndalPosition StrengthEgersund
7.26
Avg Rating
7.05
7.26Midfielder (11 v 11)7.05
14G 4A10G 2A
Sogndal
1MidfielderL. Jendal7.7
2MidfielderD. Bras7.3
33MidfielderS. A. Granheim
13MidfielderP. Flo6.9
8MidfielderJ. Flaten7.1
6MidfielderM. Hoyland7.21G
19MidfielderT. Pippola
10MidfielderK. Skaanes7.11G2A
16MidfielderL. Vapne1G
9MidfielderO. Hintsa7.37G1A
7MidfielderS. Pedersen7.54G1A
Egersund
1MidfielderA. Hermansen
2MidfielderH. Kleppa
91MidfielderS. Davis
31MidfielderI. Jonsson7.01G
3MidfielderB. Maeland
22MidfielderH. Tadesse
8MidfielderC. Sleveland
27MidfielderS. Vatne
45MidfielderM. Sauer7.25G1A
9MidfielderO. Kapskarmo6.94G1A
29MidfielderM. Haheim-Elveseter

Match Summary

Egersund defeated Sogndal 1:0. The match was played in 1. Division 2025. Goals were scored by F. Nyenetue 90′. 2 yellow cards were shown. Sogndal made 4 substitutions, Egersund made 5.

Rivalry since 2025

Sogndal vs Egersund Head to Head Results

1 stretnutí
Sogndal
1
wins
Drawn
0
Egersund
0
wins
Total goals
2 · 2.0/match
Both scored
0/1 · 0%
Over 2.5
0/1 · 0%

Recent Meetings

Highest-scoring game: 02 v 2025All 1 meetings

Recent Form

Sogndal

LWLWDL

Egersund

LWWDWW

Match Prediction

Sogndal

10%

Home win

 

45%

Draw

Egersund

45%

Away win

Model advice

Double chance : draw or Egersund

29%Form71%
32%Attack68%
22%Defence78%
88%Head-to-head13%
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 5 May 2026