Menu

Sogndal vs Ranheim

Fosshaugane Campus, Sogndal8 November 2025 at 15:00
03

Match Events

Sogndal
Ranheim
Kick Off
1′H. Rosten
R. Holten15′
R. Onyango45+1′
Half Time
47′P. Skjelbred
K. SkaanesF. Sturgeon
54′
59′
M. Johnsen
61′
P. SlordahlC. Aasbak
61′
P. SkjelbredM. Emilsen
L. VapneV. Hagen
75′
O. HintsaP. Asp
75′
81′
A. SamuelsenV. Wenaas
83′
S. Diop

assist: M. Johnsen

86′E. Tonne
89′
S. DiopJ. Berisha
P. FloE. Flo
90+2′
90′
M. Johnsen

assist: S. Nilsen

Full Time

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Sogndal is 7.28, compared to 7.02 for Ranheim. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Sogndal's highest-rated starter is L. Jendal (7.68), while Ranheim's best-rated player is A. Samuelsen (8.12).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Sogndal have contributed 14 goals and 4 assists this season, led by O. Hintsa (7G). Ranheim's starters account for 7 goals and 5 assists, spearheaded by A. Samuelsen (6G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Midfield Control

Sogndal field 11 midfielders averaging 7.28, versus Ranheim's 11 rated 7.02. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 76% for Sogndal and 85% for Ranheim. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Sogndal's starters have collected 16 yellow cards this season, compared to 8 for Ranheim. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Sogndal's starting XI is 27.0 (youngest: L. Vapne (22), oldest: P. Flo (36)), while Ranheim average 26.0 (youngest: H. Rosten (20), oldest: P. Skjelbred (38)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Sogndal's starters average 10 league appearances each, versus 11 for Ranheim. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

SogndalPosition StrengthRanheim
7.28
Avg Rating
7.02
7.28Midfielder (11 v 11)7.02
14G 4A7G 5A
Sogndal
1MidfielderL. Jendal7.7
2MidfielderD. Bras7.3
4MidfielderR. Holten
13MidfielderP. Flo6.9
88MidfielderR. Onyango
33MidfielderS. A. Granheim
6MidfielderM. Hoyland7.21G
10MidfielderK. Skaanes7.11G2A
16MidfielderL. Vapne1G
9MidfielderO. Hintsa7.37G1A
7MidfielderS. Pedersen7.54G1A
Ranheim
1MidfielderS. Nilsen7.2
22MidfielderT. B. Haukeberg
2MidfielderP. Slordahl6.5
4MidfielderH. Rosten6.6
15MidfielderE. Tonne
16MidfielderS. Diop
18MidfielderF. Camara
7MidfielderP. Skjelbred
10MidfielderA. Samuelsen8.16G4A
8MidfielderO. Holden7.01A
21MidfielderM. Johnsen6.61G

Match Summary

Ranheim defeated Sogndal 3:0. The match was played in 1. Division 2025. Goals were scored by M. Johnsen 59′, S. Diop 83′, M. Johnsen 90′. 5 yellow cards were shown. Sogndal made 4 substitutions, Ranheim made 4.

Rivalry since 2020

Sogndal vs Ranheim Head to Head Results

12 stretnutí
Sogndal
5
wins
Drawn
1
Ranheim
6
wins
Total goals
37 · 3.1/match
Both scored
5/12 · 42%
Over 2.5
8/12 · 67%

Recent Form

Sogndal

LWLWDL

Ranheim

LWWLWD

Match Prediction

Sogndal

10%

Home win

 

45%

Draw

Ranheim

45%

Away win

Model advice

Double chance : draw or Ranheim

50%Form50%
44%Attack56%
64%Defence36%
20%Head-to-head80%
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026