Menu

Panevezys Ii vs Neptuna Klaipeda

Full Time

1 Lyga · Season 2025

Panevėžio futbolo akademijos stadionas, Panevėžys25 June 2025 at 16:00

Match Events

Panevėžys II
Neptūną Klaipėda
Kick Off
9′
D. Zubauskas
17′
D. Zubauskas
24′
D. Zubauskas
31′
D. Zubauskas
A. KarvatskyiA. Jusys
34′
M. PusnysI. Lukosevicius
34′
R. MisiunasL. Laimikis
34′
Half Time
46′
EliveltonT. Hevlych
46′
M. DumalakasM. Rusys
46′
D. JurgeleviciusE. Jermolajev
E. Dzinga

Penalty

66′
K. Sonkevicius68′
69′
H. DiawaraA. Kurakinas
69′
D. ZubauskasD. Omokhoa
A. SlobodianD. Gleveckas
82′
R. LazdinauskasM. Dilys
82′
J. Okpanachi
85′
87′
T. Hevlych

Penalty

Full Time

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Panevėžys II is 6.53, compared to — for Neptūną Klaipėda. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Panevėžys II's highest-rated starter is D. Bukel (7.35), while Neptūną Klaipėda's best-rated player is —.

Midfield Control

Panevėžys II field 11 midfielders averaging 6.53, versus Neptūną Klaipėda's 11 rated —. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 77% for Panevėžys II and —% for Neptūną Klaipėda. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Panevėžys II's starters have collected 1 yellow cards this season, compared to 0 for Neptūną Klaipėda. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Panevėžys II's starting XI is 20.3 (youngest: D. Balsys (17), oldest: D. Bukel (22)), while Neptūną Klaipėda average — (youngest: —, oldest: —). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Panevėžys II's starters average 1 league appearances each, versus 0 for Neptūną Klaipėda. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Panevėžys IIPosition StrengthNeptūną Klaipėda
6.53
Avg Rating
6.53Midfielder (11 v 11)
0G 0A0G 0A
Panevėžys II
13MidfielderD. Bukel7.3
10MidfielderR. Misiunas
11MidfielderR. Lazdinauskas
16MidfielderK. Sonkevicius
18MidfielderE. Puikis
21MidfielderM. Pusnys
23MidfielderE. Dzinga6.3
29MidfielderJ. Okpanachi
30MidfielderA. Slobodian
66MidfielderD. Balsys5.9
97MidfielderA. Karvatskyi
Neptūną Klaipėda
1MidfielderA. Agalarov
3MidfielderO. Badmus
7MidfielderE. Smulkys
10MidfielderH. Diawara
11MidfielderD. Zubauskas
17MidfielderM. Dumalakas
23MidfielderA. Skurdelis
24MidfielderK. Shults
29MidfielderD. Jurgelevicius
33MidfielderA. Ankudinovas
95MidfielderElivelton

Match Summary

Neptūną Klaipėda defeated Panevėžys II 5:2. The match was played in 1 Lyga 2025. Goals were scored by D. Zubauskas 9′, D. Zubauskas 17′, D. Zubauskas 24′, D. Zubauskas 31′, E. Dzinga 66′ (pen.), J. Okpanachi 85′, T. Hevlych 87′ (pen.). 1 yellow cards were shown. Panevėžys II made 5 substitutions, Neptūną Klaipėda made 5.

Rivalry since 2021

Panevėžys II vs Neptūną Klaipėda Head to Head Results

9 stretnutí
Panevėžys II
3
wins
Drawn
2
Neptūną Klaipėda
4
wins
Total goals
32 · 3.6/match
Both scored
4/9 · 44%
Over 2.5
6/9 · 67%

Recent Form

Panevėžys II

LLLLDL

Neptūną Klaipėda

WWWLLW

Match Prediction

Panevėžys II

10%

Home win

 

45%

Draw

Neptūną Klaipėda

45%

Away win

Model advice

Winner : Neptūną Klaipėda

17%Form83%
29%Attack71%
11%Defence89%
62%Head-to-head38%
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026