Menu

Zalgiris Ii vs Be1 Nfa

Full Time

1 Lyga · Season 2025

Senvagės stadionas, Vilnius23 July 2025 at 16:00
Home

Žalgiris II

10
Away

Be1 NFA

Match Events

Žalgiris II
Be1 NFA
Kick Off
V. Berenta
25′
Half Time
G. ZederstreimasG. Mikelaitis
46′
46′
J. RakauskasD. Jansonas
A. Soja52′
B. BruzgaR. Kursevicius
62′
R. Kursevicius64′
68′
J. ZiedelisE. Trumpa
K. KontautasV. Bradunas
70′
79′
T. GudaitisG. Barkauskas
N. KlimaviciusD. Kurec
83′
V. BerentaA. Demidov
83′
88′
T. MamisK. Kuodis
Full Time

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Žalgiris II is 7.16, compared to — for Be1 NFA. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Žalgiris II's highest-rated starter is N. Klimavicius (7.40), while Be1 NFA's best-rated player is —.

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Žalgiris II have contributed 2 goals and 1 assists this season, led by M. Burba (1G). Be1 NFA's starters account for 0 goals and 0 assists, spearheaded by —. Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Midfield Control

Žalgiris II field 11 midfielders averaging 7.16, versus Be1 NFA's 11 rated —. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 66% for Žalgiris II and —% for Be1 NFA. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Žalgiris II's starters have collected 1 yellow cards this season, compared to 0 for Be1 NFA. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Žalgiris II's starting XI is 21.0 (youngest: N. Klimavicius (20), oldest: M. Burba (22)), while Be1 NFA average — (youngest: —, oldest: —). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Žalgiris II's starters average 3 league appearances each, versus 0 for Be1 NFA. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Žalgiris IIPosition StrengthBe1 NFA
7.16
Avg Rating
7.16Midfielder (11 v 11)
2G 1A0G 0A
Žalgiris II
95MidfielderD. Cekavicius
3MidfielderD. Aleksa7.0
16MidfielderK. Kontautas
24MidfielderM. Burba7.01G
27MidfielderV. Berenta
33MidfielderN. Klimavicius7.41G1A
40MidfielderG. Zederstreimas
60MidfielderT. Baksys
83MidfielderA. Soja
88MidfielderB. Bruzga
89MidfielderA. Alfieri
Be1 NFA
77MidfielderE. Starkus
4MidfielderP. Stankus
7MidfielderJ. Rakauskas
8MidfielderD. Sluta
17MidfielderJ. Turcinskas
18MidfielderJ. Ziedelis
20MidfielderM. Issah
23MidfielderT. Gudaitis
26MidfielderJ. Adah
28MidfielderT. Mamis
55MidfielderU. W. Akpan

Match Summary

Žalgiris II defeated Be1 NFA 1:0. The match was played in 1 Lyga 2025. Goals were scored by V. Berenta 25′. 2 yellow cards were shown. Žalgiris II made 5 substitutions, Be1 NFA made 4.

Rivalry since 2025

Žalgiris II vs Be1 NFA Head to Head Results

1 stretnutí
Žalgiris II
0
wins
Drawn
1
Be1 NFA
0
wins
Total goals
2 · 2.0/match
Both scored
1/1 · 100%
Over 2.5
0/1 · 0%

Recent Meetings

Highest-scoring game: 11 v 2025All 1 meetings

Recent Form

Žalgiris II

LDLWDD

Be1 NFA

WWWLWD

Match Prediction

Žalgiris II

35%

Home win

 

35%

Draw

Be1 NFA

30%

Away win

Model advice

Double chance : Žalgiris II or draw

56%Form44%
63%Attack37%
45%Defence55%
7%Head-to-head93%
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 4 May 2026