Menu

Hodd vs Flekker Y

Nye Høddvoll Stadion, Ulsteinvik28 April 2024 at 15:00
Home

hodd

30
Referee: T. Halsen

Match Events

hodd
Flekkerøy
Kick Off
I. Skotheim
37′
Half Time
57′
O. RønningenA. Hauge
M. Håheim-Elveseter
58′
E. Myrlid61′
I. SkotheimD. Brandal
64′
64′
L. EftevaagE. Nahiry
E. Myrlid
64′
68′
S. ValandA. Kloster
68′
A. FredriksenA. Sørum
H. UrnesF. Gjerde
71′
76′A. Sorum
79′M. Madsen
A. FjørtoftA. Roppen
81′
E. MyrlidO. Aske
81′
Full Time

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for hodd is 6.82, compared to — for Flekkerøy. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. hodd's highest-rated starter is I. Skotheim (7.47), while Flekkerøy's best-rated player is —.

Attacking Output

The starting XI of hodd have contributed 14 goals and 5 assists this season, led by E. Myrlid (6G). Flekkerøy's starters account for 1 goals and 0 assists, spearheaded by L. Eftevaag (1G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Midfield Control

hodd field 11 midfielders averaging 6.82, versus Flekkerøy's 11 rated —. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 81% for hodd and —% for Flekkerøy. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

hodd's starters have collected 15 yellow cards this season, compared to 1 for Flekkerøy. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of hodd's starting XI is 24.8 (youngest: M. Mulac (20), oldest: T. Murray (32)), while Flekkerøy average 25.2 (youngest: L. Eftevaag (21), oldest: A. Knezović (32)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

hodd's starters average 12 league appearances each, versus 2 for Flekkerøy. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

hoddPosition StrengthFlekkerøy
6.82
Avg Rating
6.82Midfielder (11 v 11)
14G 5A1G 0A
hodd
1MidfielderO. Alme
2MidfielderT. Murray
3MidfielderA. Fjørtoft
4MidfielderE. Blikstad7.2
17MidfielderT. Johansen7.0
5MidfielderM. Mulac6.5
8MidfielderT. Kallevåg6.52G
10MidfielderI. Skotheim7.54G1A
6MidfielderH. Urnes6.52G2A
11MidfielderM. Håheim-Elveseter
9MidfielderE. Myrlid6.66G2A
Flekkerøy
1MidfielderA. Knezović
14MidfielderM. Madsen
5MidfielderB. Sundo
15MidfielderS. Ystanes
40MidfielderS. Osestad
4MidfielderT. Kongerud
2MidfielderO. Rønningen
8MidfielderL. Eftevaag1G
17MidfielderA. Fredriksen
3MidfielderF. Lien
9MidfielderS. Valand

Match Summary

hodd defeated Flekkerøy 3:0. The match was played in 2. Division - Group 1 2024. Goals were scored by I. Skotheim 37′, M. Håheim-Elveseter 58′, E. Myrlid 64′. 3 yellow cards were shown. hodd made 4 substitutions, Flekkerøy made 4.

Rivalry since 2024

hodd vs Flekkerøy Head to Head Results

1 stretnutí
hodd
1
wins
Drawn
0
Flekkerøy
0
wins
Total goals
3 · 3.0/match
Both scored
0/1 · 0%
Over 2.5
1/1 · 100%

Recent Meetings

Highest-scoring game: 03 v 2024All 1 meetings

Recent Form

hodd

DDLLDL

Flekkerøy

LDLWLL

Match Prediction

hodd

10%

Home win

 

45%

Draw

Flekkerøy

45%

Away win

Model advice

Combo Double chance : draw or Flekkerøy and +1.5 goals

20%Form80%
44%Attack56%
45%Defence55%
0%Head-to-head0%
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026