Menu

Grorud vs Strindheim

Grorud Matchbane, Oslo27 September 2025 at 13:00
Home

Grorud

21
Away

Strindheim

Match Events

Grorud
Strindheim
Kick Off
T. Mrakovic17′
M. Dubois
36′
Half Time
53′A. Glosen
T. Mrakovic
54′
B. TobiassenA. Tjomsland
60′
S. BratvoldS. Hammershaug
60′
63′
O. BrautesetG. Lewis
63′
B. FeldtH. Standal
66′
G. Lewis
C. Fjeld76′
M. DuboisT. Etholm
79′
83′S. Halgunset
84′
K. MorkvedB. Andresen
84′
A. Reiertsen AngellsenE. Kizilirmak
87′E. Kizilirmak
87′
A. GlosenV. Donnem
Full Time

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Grorud is 7.20, compared to — for Strindheim. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Grorud's highest-rated starter is B. Brevik (7.40), while Strindheim's best-rated player is —.

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Grorud have contributed 4 goals and 1 assists this season, led by J. Rasen (3G). Strindheim's starters account for 0 goals and 0 assists, spearheaded by —. Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Midfield Control

Grorud field 11 midfielders averaging 7.20, versus Strindheim's 11 rated —. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 85% for Grorud and —% for Strindheim. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Grorud's starters have collected 4 yellow cards this season, compared to 0 for Strindheim. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Grorud's starting XI is 21.5 (youngest: J. Rasen (21), oldest: B. Brevik (22)), while Strindheim average — (youngest: —, oldest: —). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Grorud's starters average 10 league appearances each, versus 0 for Strindheim. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

GrorudPosition StrengthStrindheim
7.20
Avg Rating
7.20Midfielder (11 v 11)
4G 1A0G 0A
Grorud
1MidfielderL. Kvarekval
19MidfielderM. Mahnin
10MidfielderM. Dubois
6MidfielderS. Beck
3MidfielderB. Brevik7.41G
17MidfielderJ. Rasen7.03G1A
5MidfielderW. Silfver-Ramage
36MidfielderB. Tobiassen
4MidfielderT. Mrakovic
15MidfielderC. Fjeld
9MidfielderS. Bratvold
Strindheim
21MidfielderJ. Hovstein
8MidfielderF. Lund
4MidfielderL. Valderhaug
22MidfielderS. Halgunset
20MidfielderA. Reiertsen Angellsen
6MidfielderA. Glosen
25MidfielderK. Morkved
3MidfielderO. Brauteset
10MidfielderJ. Kosberg
9MidfielderB. Feldt
29MidfielderV. Kvande

Match Summary

Grorud defeated Strindheim 2:1. The match was played in 2. Division - Group 2 2025. Goals were scored by M. Dubois 36′, T. Mrakovic 54′, G. Lewis 66′. 5 yellow cards were shown. Grorud made 3 substitutions, Strindheim made 5.

Rivalry since 2025

Grorud vs Strindheim Head to Head Results

1 stretnutí
Grorud
1
wins
Drawn
0
Strindheim
0
wins
Total goals
2 · 2.0/match
Both scored
0/1 · 0%
Over 2.5
0/1 · 0%

Recent Meetings

Highest-scoring game: 02 v 2025All 1 meetings

Recent Form

Grorud

LLWWWW

Strindheim

WWLWLL

Match Prediction

Grorud

45%

Home win

 

45%

Draw

Strindheim

10%

Away win

Model advice

Combo Winner : Grorud and +2.5 goals

76%Form24%
58%Attack42%
75%Defence25%
50%Head-to-head50%
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 8 May 2026