Menu

Levanger vs B Rum

TOBB ARENA Levanger, Levanger9 October 2022 at 14:00

Match Events

Levanger
Bærum
Kick Off
8′S. Eng Strand
A. Gundersen
15′
H. K. Lorentsen20′
H. LorentsenM. Høstland
36′
42′
R. Løvseth
Half Time
46′
T. AgelinK. Haugen
E. Hajdari
51′
58′
M. MyrmoE. Khachatrjan
S. Strand

Own Goal

58′
66′M. Augdal
S. SaugestadK. Ulstad
70′
S. BojadzicP. Asp
70′
M. B. Olsen76′
78′
C. ArvesenR. Sorter
A. TeigenT. Olsen
85′
E. HajdariM. Håkansson
85′
P. Asp
87′
88′
B. Brevik

Own Goal

Full Time

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Levanger is 7.32, compared to — for Bærum. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Levanger's highest-rated starter is S. Hagbø (7.56), while Bærum's best-rated player is —.

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Levanger have contributed 5 goals and 4 assists this season, led by S. Hagbø (2G). Bærum's starters account for 0 goals and 0 assists, spearheaded by —. Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Midfield Control

Levanger field 11 midfielders averaging 7.32, versus Bærum's 11 rated —. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 76% for Levanger and —% for Bærum. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Levanger's starters have collected 5 yellow cards this season, compared to 0 for Bærum. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Levanger's starting XI is 28.6 (youngest: S. Saugestad (25), oldest: J. Aas (36)), while Bærum average 32.3 (youngest: C. Arvesen (23), oldest: H. Hauger (40)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Levanger's starters average 10 league appearances each, versus 0 for Bærum. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

LevangerPosition StrengthBærum
7.32
Avg Rating
7.32Midfielder (11 v 11)
5G 4A0G 0A
Levanger
12MidfielderE. Henriksen
6MidfielderS. Hagbø7.62G2A
5MidfielderH. Lorentsen7.5
14MidfielderM. Olsen
3MidfielderB. Brevik
10MidfielderJ. Aas6.91G
18MidfielderS. Saugestad
20MidfielderA. Teigen7.12G2A
7MidfielderE. Hajdari7.5
9MidfielderA. Gundersen
11MidfielderS. Bojadzic
Bærum
1MidfielderS. Midtgarden
18MidfielderB. Yapi Zalo
2MidfielderT. Agelin
6MidfielderH. Hauger
9MidfielderM. Augdal
3MidfielderS. Strand
15MidfielderN. Grimstad
16MidfielderM. Jatta
14MidfielderC. Arvesen
23MidfielderM. Myrmo
17MidfielderR. Løvseth

Match Summary

Levanger defeated Bærum 4:2. The match was played in 2. Division - Group 2 2022. Goals were scored by A. Gundersen 15′, R. Løvseth 42′, E. Hajdari 51′, S. Strand 58′ (o.g.), P. Asp 87′, B. Brevik 88′ (o.g.). 4 yellow cards were shown. Levanger made 5 substitutions, Bærum made 3.

Rivalry since 2020

Levanger vs Bærum Head to Head Results

4 stretnutí
Levanger
2
wins
Drawn
2
Bærum
0
wins
Total goals
18 · 4.5/match
Both scored
2/4 · 50%
Over 2.5
3/4 · 75%

Recent Form

Levanger

LWDLLW

Bærum

WWWLDL

Match Prediction

Levanger

45%

Home win

 

45%

Draw

Bærum

10%

Away win

Model advice

Combo Double chance : Levanger or draw and +1.5 goals

47%Form53%
69%Attack31%
37%Defence63%
50%Head-to-head50%
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026