Match Summary

FC Seoul and Sanfrecce Hiroshima drew 2:2. The match was played in AFC Champions League Elite 2025. Goals were scored by P. Klimala 10′ (pen.), N. Arai 27′ (o.g.), R. Germain 90′, K. Kinoshita 90′. 4 yellow cards were shown. FC Seoul had 48% possession while Sanfrecce Hiroshima held 52%. FC Seoul had 11 shots (2 on target) compared to 14 (7 on target) for Sanfrecce Hiroshima. Expected goals: FC Seoul 1.42 — Sanfrecce Hiroshima 2.54. FC Seoul made 3 substitutions, Sanfrecce Hiroshima made 5.

Match Events

Key match events between FC Seoul and Sanfrecce Hiroshima — 4 goals and 4 cards recorded during the match.

FC Seoul
Sanfrecce Hiroshima
Kick Off
P. Klimala

Penalty

10′
N. Arai

Own Goal

27′
Half Time
46′
N. AraiT. Yamasaki
60′
M. KatoK. Kinoshita
60′
H. KawabeS. Nakamura
68′
D. SugaT. Shichi
Cho Young-WookL. Ruiz
75′
Song Min-KyuMoon Seon-Min
80′
86′
S. HigashiM. Ohara
P. KlimalaAnderson Oliveira
90+7′
90′
K. Kinoshita

assist: T. Shichi

Full Time

Match Statistics

FC Seoul had 48% possession against Sanfrecce Hiroshima's 52%. FC Seoul registered 11 shots (2 on target) while Sanfrecce Hiroshima managed 14 (7 on target). Corner kicks: 3–8. Fouls committed: 15–14.

2Shots on Goal7
6Shots off Goal2
11Total Shots14
3Blocked Shots5
9Shots insidebox12
2Shots outsidebox2
15Fouls14
3Corner Kicks8
1Offsides2
48%Ball Possession52%
3Yellow Cards1
0Red Cards0
6Goalkeeper Saves1
368Total passes389
282Passes accurate324
77%Passes %83%
1.42expected_goals2.54
-1goals_prevented-1

Lineups

FC Seoul lined up in a 4-4-2 formation under Gi-Dong Kim, while Sanfrecce Hiroshima deployed a 3-4-2-1 under Bartosch Gaul.

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for FC Seoul is 6.68, compared to 6.88 for Sanfrecce Hiroshima. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. FC Seoul's highest-rated starter is Choi Jun (6.85), while Sanfrecce Hiroshima's best-rated player is H. Araki (7.31).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of FC Seoul have contributed 4 goals and 2 assists this season, led by P. Klimala (2G). Sanfrecce Hiroshima's starters account for 7 goals and 3 assists, spearheaded by H. Araki (2G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

FC Seoul deploy 4 defenders rated 6.67 on average, against Sanfrecce Hiroshima's 3-man backline averaging 7.16. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

FC Seoul field 4 midfielders averaging 6.76, versus Sanfrecce Hiroshima's 5 rated 6.74. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

FC Seoul start 2 forward(s) averaging 6.59, compared to 2 for Sanfrecce Hiroshima averaging 6.76. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 77% for FC Seoul and 77% for Sanfrecce Hiroshima. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

FC Seoul's starters have collected 11 yellow cards this season, compared to 9 for Sanfrecce Hiroshima. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of FC Seoul's starting XI is 27.5 (youngest: Park Seong-Hoon (22), oldest: Kim Jin-Su (33)), while Sanfrecce Hiroshima average 27.1 (youngest: A. Suzuki (22), oldest: H. Kawabe (30)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

FC Seoul's starters average 7 league appearances each, versus 7 for Sanfrecce Hiroshima. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

FC Seoul4-4-23-4-2-1Sanfrecce Hiroshima
GKDEFMIDFWD
99Sung-Yun16Jun40Seong-H.20Han-Do22Jin-Su7Seung-W.8Seung-Mo6Babec34Min-Kyu32Klimala9Young-W.1Osako15Nakano4Araki24Higashi13Arai6Kawabe88Matsumo.18Suga9Germain51Kato29Suzuki

Substitutes

Coach: Gi-Dong Kim

Substitutes

Coach: Bartosch Gaul

FC SeoulPosition StrengthSanfrecce Hiroshima
6.68
Avg Rating
6.88
6.58Goalkeeper (1 v 1)7.02
0G 0A0G 0A
6.67Defender (4 v 3)7.16
1G 1A2G 2A
6.76Midfielder (4 v 5)6.74
1G 1A2G 1A
6.59Forward (2 v 2)6.76
2G 0A3G 0A
FC Seoul4-4-2
99GoalkeeperGu Sung-Yun6.6
16DefenderChoi Jun6.81G1A
40DefenderPark Seong-Hoon6.7
20DefenderLee Han-Do6.3
22DefenderKim Jin-Su6.8
7MidfielderJeong Seung-Won6.81G
8MidfielderLee Seung-Mo6.7
6MidfielderH. Babec6.8
34MidfielderSong Min-Kyu6.81A
32ForwardP. Klimala6.62G
9ForwardCho Young-Wook6.6
Sanfrecce Hiroshima3-4-2-1
1GoalkeeperK. Osako7.0
15DefenderS. Nakano7.11A
4DefenderH. Araki7.32G
24DefenderS. Higashi7.11A
13MidfielderN. Arai6.81A
6MidfielderH. Kawabe6.6
88MidfielderT. Matsumoto6.7
18MidfielderD. Suga6.7
51MidfielderM. Kato6.82G
9ForwardR. Germain6.41G
29ForwardA. Suzuki7.12G

Recent Form

In their last 6 matches, FC Seoul have recorded 0 wins, 2 draws and 4 defeats. Sanfrecce Hiroshima show 4 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses from their last 6 outings.

FC Seoul

LLDLDL

Sanfrecce Hiroshima

WLDWWW
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 20 Apr 2026