Menu

Zulte Waregem vs As Eupen

Elindus Arena, Waregem25 January 2025 at 19:00
Referee: A. Denil

Match Events

Zulte Waregem
AS Eupen
Kick Off
8′
E. Gedikli

assist: B. Çalışkan

28′Jan Gorenc
33′
B. Çalışkan

assist: T. Alloh

Nicolas Rommens42′
45′Emrehan Gedikli
Half Time
A. BarkarsonY. Cappelle
46′
49′Bertan Caliskan
57′
B. ÇalışkanJ. Déom
57′
T. AllohR. Emond
63′
S. KennedyS. Pattynama
J. ErenbjergMatheus Machado
64′
67′Shayne Pattynama
S. Gavriel

assist: B. Nyssen

68′
71′Shayne Pattynama
71′Shayne Pattynama
Matheus Machado

assist: J. Vossen

71′
77′
P. NiangL. Dalla Costa
77′
Regan Charles-CookA. Piron
Matheus Machado

assist: J. Vossen

81′
J. OpokuA. Traoré
89′
Full Time

Match Statistics

6Shots on Goal2
13Shots off Goal5
28Total Shots8
9Blocked Shots1
15Shots insidebox3
13Shots outsidebox5
8Fouls11
11Corner Kicks1
4Offsides1
74%Ball Possession26%
2Yellow Cards4
0Red Cards2
0Goalkeeper Saves3
607Total passes224
526Passes accurate141
87%Passes %63%
0expected_goals0
0goals_prevented0

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Zulte Waregem is 6.83, compared to 6.89 for AS Eupen. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Zulte Waregem's highest-rated starter is J. Erenbjerg (7.11), while AS Eupen's best-rated player is R. Paeshuyse (7.07).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Zulte Waregem have contributed 29 goals and 13 assists this season, led by J. Erenbjerg (13G). AS Eupen's starters account for 4 goals and 4 assists, spearheaded by R. Paeshuyse (1G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

Zulte Waregem deploy 4 defenders rated 6.83 on average, against AS Eupen's 3-man backline averaging 6.99. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

Zulte Waregem field 5 midfielders averaging 6.92, versus AS Eupen's 4 rated 6.85. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

Zulte Waregem start 1 forward(s) averaging 6.54, compared to 3 for AS Eupen averaging 6.73. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 78% for Zulte Waregem and 81% for AS Eupen. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Zulte Waregem's starters have collected 12 yellow cards this season, compared to 9 for AS Eupen. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Zulte Waregem's starting XI is 25.6 (youngest: J. Opoku (20), oldest: J. Vossen (36)), while AS Eupen average 23.6 (youngest: B. Çalışkan (20), oldest: S. Kennedy (28)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Zulte Waregem's starters average 24 league appearances each, versus 17 for AS Eupen. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Zulte Waregem4-2-3-13-4-3AS Eupen
GKDEFMIDFWD
23Gouw19Nyssen4Lemoine31Willen14Barkars.8Rommens17Diop11Gavriel24Erenbje.22Opoku9Vossen44Renner28Paeshuy.30Gorenc4Kennedy2Genecht.6Baiye26Niang29Alloh61Çalışkan90Gedikli10Charles.

Substitutes

Coach: S. Vandenbroeck

Substitutes

Coach: M. Selimbegović

Zulte WaregemPosition StrengthAS Eupen
6.83
Avg Rating
6.89
6.83Defender (4 v 3)6.99
3G 3A2G 1A
6.92Midfielder (5 v 4)6.85
24G 10A1G 2A
6.54Forward (1 v 3)6.73
2G 0A1G 1A
Zulte Waregem4-2-3-1
23GoalkeeperE. van der Gouw
19DefenderB. Nyssen6.82G2A
4DefenderL. Lemoine7.01G
31DefenderL. Willen6.71A
14DefenderA. Barkarson
8MidfielderN. Rommens
17MidfielderP. Diop
11MidfielderS. Gavriel6.81G1A
24MidfielderJ. Erenbjerg7.113G3A
22MidfielderJ. Opoku6.910G6A
9ForwardJ. Vossen6.52G
AS Eupen3-4-3
44GoalkeeperJ. Renner
28DefenderR. Paeshuyse7.11G1A
30DefenderJ. Gorenc
4DefenderS. Kennedy6.91G
2MidfielderY. Van Genechten6.81G2A
6MidfielderB. Baiye
26MidfielderP. Niang
29MidfielderT. Alloh
61ForwardB. Çalışkan6.71G1A
90ForwardE. Gedikli
10ForwardRegan Charles-Cook

Match Summary

Zulte Waregem defeated AS Eupen 3:2. The match was played in Challenger Pro League 2024. Goals were scored by E. Gedikli 8′, B. Çalışkan 33′, S. Gavriel 68′, Matheus Machado 71′, Matheus Machado 81′. 6 yellow cards were shown, 2 red cards. Zulte Waregem had 74% possession while AS Eupen held 26%. Zulte Waregem had 28 shots (6 on target) compared to 8 (2 on target) for AS Eupen. Zulte Waregem made 3 substitutions, AS Eupen made 5.

Rivalry since 2010

Zulte Waregem vs AS Eupen Head to Head Results

17 stretnutí
Zulte Waregem
13
wins
Drawn
4
AS Eupen
0
wins
Total goals
64 · 3.8/match
Both scored
10/17 · 59%
Over 2.5
12/17 · 71%

Recent Form

Zulte Waregem

WWWWDW

AS Eupen

LDWDWL

Match Prediction

Zulte Waregem

50%

Home win

 

50%

Draw

AS Eupen

0%

Away win

Model advice

Double chance : Zulte Waregem or draw

81%Form19%
59%Attack41%
69%Defence31%
71%Head-to-head29%
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026