2 April 2024 at 17:00

11
Full Time
Eliteserien · Season 2024
Referee: M. Aslam

Match Summary

KFUM Oslo and Ham-Kam drew 1:1. The match was played in Eliteserien 2024. Goals were scored by M. Mawa 12′, P. Dahl 89′. 5 yellow cards were shown. KFUM Oslo had 67% possession while Ham-Kam held 33%. KFUM Oslo had 18 shots (9 on target) compared to 9 (2 on target) for Ham-Kam. Expected goals: KFUM Oslo 2.34 — Ham-Kam 1.17. KFUM Oslo made 4 substitutions, Ham-Kam made 4.

Match Events

Key match events between KFUM Oslo and Ham-Kam — 2 goals and 5 cards recorded during the match.

KFUM Oslo
Ham-Kam
Kick Off
12′
M. Mawa

assist: T. Sørås

Half Time
S. SandalM. Ndiaye
64′
A. NouriD. Hickson
64′
68′
T. SøråsN. Ødegård
68′
V. JónssonB. Bjarnason
77′
M. MawaO. Kjærgaard
R. SvindlandJ. Nuñez
86′
Momodou NjieK. Harrison
86′
89′
90+6′Brynjar Ingi Bjarnason
90+1′
K. OnsrudH. Udahl
Full Time

Match Statistics

KFUM Oslo had 67% possession against Ham-Kam's 33%. KFUM Oslo registered 18 shots (9 on target) while Ham-Kam managed 9 (2 on target). Corner kicks: 6–3. Fouls committed: 11–16.

9Shots on Goal2
6Shots off Goal4
18Total Shots9
3Blocked Shots3
14Shots insidebox4
4Shots outsidebox5
11Fouls16
6Corner Kicks3
1Offsides1
67%Ball Possession33%
1Yellow Cards4
0Red Cards0
1Goalkeeper Saves8
550Total passes274
464Passes accurate177
84%Passes %65%
2.34expected_goals1.17

Lineups

KFUM Oslo lined up in a 3-4-3 formation under J. Moesgaard, while Ham-Kam deployed a 3-5-2 under J. Michelsen.

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for KFUM Oslo is 6.66, compared to 6.72 for Ham-Kam. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. KFUM Oslo's highest-rated starter is Momodou Njie (6.66), while Ham-Kam's best-rated player is V. Jónsson (6.88).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of KFUM Oslo have contributed 0 goals and 0 assists this season, led by —. Ham-Kam's starters account for 8 goals and 4 assists, spearheaded by M. Mawa (4G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

KFUM Oslo deploy 3 defenders rated 6.66 on average, against Ham-Kam's 3-man backline averaging —. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

KFUM Oslo field 4 midfielders averaging —, versus Ham-Kam's 5 rated 6.85. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

KFUM Oslo start 3 forward(s) averaging —, compared to 2 for Ham-Kam averaging 6.59. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Discipline

KFUM Oslo's starters have collected 3 yellow cards this season, compared to 8 for Ham-Kam. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of KFUM Oslo's starting XI is 28.0 (youngest: Momodou Njie (24), oldest: S. Akinyemi (32)), while Ham-Kam average 29.7 (youngest: V. Kongsro (27), oldest: P. Kirkevold (35)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

KFUM Oslo's starters average 10 league appearances each, versus 15 for Ham-Kam. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

KFUM OsloPosition StrengthHam-Kam
6.66
Avg Rating
6.72
6.66🛡 DEF (3 v 3)
0G 0A0G 0A
MID (4 v 5)6.85
0G 0A4G 4A
FWD (3 v 2)6.59
0G 0A4G 0A
KFUM Oslo3-4-3
1🧤GKE. Ødegaard
5🛡DEFS. Akinyemi
4🛡DEFMomodou Njie6.7
15🛡DEFM. Tønnessen
14MIDH. Hoseth
7MIDR. Rasch
8MIDS. Hestnes
33MIDA. Nouri
6FWDR. Svindland
25FWDS. Sandal
22FWDP. Dahl
Ham-Kam3-5-2
12🧤GKM. Sandberg
14🛡DEFL. Mares
6🛡DEFJ. Norheim
2🛡DEFV. Kongsro
22MIDS. Strand Nilsen
7MIDK. Onsrud
19MIDW. Kurtović
11MIDT. Sørås6.81G1A
21MIDV. Jónsson6.93G3A
16FWDP. Kirkevold6.4
10FWDM. Mawa6.84G

Substitutes

42(D)D. Hickson
9(F)J. Nuñez
13(G)W. Da Rocha
10(F)Moussa Njie

Recent Form

In their last 6 matches, KFUM Oslo have recorded 0 wins, 2 draws and 4 defeats. Ham-Kam show 4 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses from their last 6 outings.

KFUM Oslo

LLDLLD

Ham-Kam

LWLWWW

Head to Head

KFUM Oslo and Ham-Kam have met 2 times — KFUM Oslo won 0, Ham-Kam won 0, with 2 draws. Their rivalry dates back to 2025. A combined 4 goals have been scored across these fixtures, averaging 2.00 per match (2 for the home side, 2 for the visitors). Both teams scored in 1 matches (50%). Over 2.5 goals landed in 1 games (50%), making it a fixture that tends to produce goals. The highest-scoring encounter finished 2–2 in 2025.

0

KFUM Oslo

2

Drawn

0

Ham-Kam

Goals: 2Goals: 2

Recent Meetings (2)

22 Aug 2025KFUM Oslo2 – 2Ham-Kam
2 May 2025Ham-Kam0 – 0KFUM Oslo

API data: 15 Mar 2026

KFUM Oslo vs Ham-Kam — Match Details | Betmana - Sports Betting