11 October 2025 at 11:00

02
Full Time
Stadium: Umea Energi Arena SOL, Umea

Match Events

Key match events between Team TG FF W and Jitex W — 2 goals and 2 cards recorded during the match.

Team TG FF W
Jitex W
Kick Off
25′
T. Ivarsson-Lidstrom
Half Time
O. WallnerN. Wallner
61′
I. OlssonA. Nabb
69′
E. NorlinF. Ritzen
69′
69′
E. AlexanderssonE. Lindback
69′
H. AndreassonA. C. Ebbesson
79′
H. ComnellA. Maric
A. Nabb80′
E. WidesjoE. Grenholm
82′
M. VaglundO. Nasstrom
82′
82′
L. KennethssonF. Hogberg
Full Time

Lineups

Team TG FF W lined up in a — formation under J. Wikström, while Jitex W deployed a — under D. Ivarsson.

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Team TG FF W is —, compared to 7.40 for Jitex W. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Team TG FF W's highest-rated starter is —, while Jitex W's best-rated player is D. Hellwig (7.40).

Midfield Control

Team TG FF W field 11 midfielders averaging —, versus Jitex W's 11 rated 7.40. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages —% for Team TG FF W and 68% for Jitex W. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Age & Experience

The average age of Team TG FF W's starting XI is 22.0 (youngest: K. Nyberg (22), oldest: K. Nyberg (22)), while Jitex W average 23.0 (youngest: D. Hellwig (23), oldest: D. Hellwig (23)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Team TG FF W's starters average 6 league appearances each, versus 11 for Jitex W. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Team TG FF WPosition StrengthJitex W
Avg Rating
7.40
Midfielder (11 v 11)7.40
0G 0A0G 0A
Team TG FF W
30MidfielderO. Wallner
22MidfielderT. Vikstrom
2MidfielderL. Lundgren
6MidfielderL. Lindstrom
14MidfielderE. Norlin
5MidfielderI. Olsson
12MidfielderK. Nyberg
11MidfielderE. Dahlin
15MidfielderE. Widesjo
10MidfielderA. Sandstrom
19MidfielderM. Vaglund
Jitex W
1MidfielderD. Hellwig7.4
18MidfielderH. Comnell
20MidfielderE. Andersson
3MidfielderJ. Eklund
19MidfielderM. Sipilainen
6MidfielderH. Andreasson
13MidfielderT. Hoglund
10MidfielderE. Alexandersson
7MidfielderL. Kennethsson
15MidfielderI. Kjellman
11MidfielderT. Ivarsson-Lidstrom

Match Summary

Jitex W defeated Team TG FF W 2:0. The match was played in Elitettan 2025. Goals were scored by T. Ivarsson-Lidstrom 25′, J. Eklund 76′. 2 yellow cards were shown. Team TG FF W made 5 substitutions, Jitex W made 4.

Team TG FF W vs Jitex W Head to Head Results

Team TG FF W and Jitex W have met 1 times — Team TG FF W won 0, Jitex W won 1, with 0 draws. Their rivalry dates back to 2025. Jitex W leads the head-to-head with 1 victories from 1 meetings. A combined 5 goals have been scored across these fixtures, averaging 5.00 per match (0 for the home side, 5 for the visitors). Both teams scored in 0 matches (0%). Over 2.5 goals landed in 1 games (100%), making it a fixture that tends to produce goals. The highest-scoring encounter finished 5–0 in 2025.

0

Team TG FF W

0

Drawn

1

Jitex W

Goals: 0Goals: 5

Recent Meetings (1)

18 Jun 2025Jitex W5 – 0Team TG FF W

Recent Form

In their last 6 matches, Team TG FF W have recorded 1 wins, 2 draws and 3 defeats. Jitex W show 3 wins, 2 draws and 1 losses from their last 6 outings.

Team TG FF W

DDLLWL

Jitex W

LWWDWD
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 15 Mar 2026