Serie B · Season 2021
Match Events
Own Goal
Match Statistics
Lineups
Squad Ratings
The overall squad rating for como is 6.50, compared to 6.65 for Pisa. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. como's highest-rated starter is A. Cerri (6.50), while Pisa's best-rated player is I. Touré (6.78).
Attacking Output
The starting XI of como have contributed 0 goals and 0 assists this season, led by —. Pisa's starters account for 3 goals and 0 assists, spearheaded by A. Caracciolo (2G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.
Defensive Solidity
como deploy 3 defenders rated — on average, against Pisa's 4-man backline averaging 6.66. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.
Midfield Control
como field 4 midfielders averaging —, versus Pisa's 5 rated 6.78. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.
Forward Threat
como start 3 forward(s) averaging 6.50, compared to 1 for Pisa averaging —. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.
Passing & Build-Up
Passing accuracy averages —% for como and 71% for Pisa. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.
Discipline
como's starters have collected 0 yellow cards this season, compared to 13 for Pisa. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.
Age & Experience
The average age of como's starting XI is 29.0 (youngest: A. Cerri (29), oldest: A. Cerri (29)), while Pisa average 31.5 (youngest: P. Beruatto (27), oldest: Nícolas (37)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.
Squad Depth
como's starters average 1 league appearances each, versus 23 for Pisa. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.
Substitutes
Coach: G. Gattuso
Substitutes
Coach: L. D'Angelo
Match Summary
Pisa defeated como 1:0. The match was played in Serie B 2021. Goals were scored by F. Scaglia 5′ (o.g.). 5 yellow cards were shown. como had 56% possession while Pisa held 44%. como had 21 shots (6 on target) compared to 13 (2 on target) for Pisa. como made 5 substitutions, Pisa made 4.
como vs Pisa Head to Head Results
8 stretnutíRecent Meetings
Recent Form
como
Pisa
Betting Odds & Historical Data
Opening pre-match odds recorded for this fixture at the time it was played. These are historical figures for analytical reference only and do not reflect any current market.
Historical data only — not for betting
This data is sourced from football-data.co.uk and covers historical match results and pre-match odds. These figures do not represent current or live odds and cannot be used for placing bets. Betting is not possible on this website. Provided for analytical and research purposes only.
Head-to-Head Record
Even recordHistorical results between these two teams — showing who has dominated this fixture and whether the current odds reflect that pattern.
Goals in This Fixture
How many goals these two teams typically produce when they meet, based on their historical encounters.
3.2
Average goals per game
67%
Games with 3+ goals
83%
Both teams scored
Market Summary
Margin: 6.2%Implied win probabilities calculated from pre-match odds across multiple sources. A higher percentage means the market considered that outcome more likely. Compare these against your own assessment to spot potential value.
Implied Probability
Odds Range
| 1 | X | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Min | 2.50 | 3.00 | 2.75 |
| Max | 2.66 | 3.11 | 3.04 |
Market Consensus
Professional markets (sharp bookmakers) reflect sharp money and are harder to beat. Public markets are softer. When the two disagree significantly (highlighted in amber), it may indicate a mispriced line worth investigating.
| 1 | X | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Professional market | 36.6% | 31.3% | 32.0% |
| Public market | 36.8% | 29.7% | 33.5% |
| Δ | 0.2% | 1.6% | 1.4% |
como vs Pisa — margin-removed probabilities
Result vs. Market
Result differed from market prediction
Match Statistics
Actual in-game statistics recorded for this match. Shots on target is a strong indicator of attacking pressure and correlates well with expected goals.
Head-to-Head History
Historical results between these two teams. Bold odds show which outcome was backed by the market — compare against the actual result to assess predictability of this fixture over time.
Home Record / Away Record
Aggregated season statistics from all available historical data. Use these to assess each team's overall form, scoring frequency, and tendency for high-scoring matches.
Home Record: como
Away Record: Pisa
Data: football-data.co.uk
API data: 11 May 2026