Match Summary
Gamba Osaka defeated Sagan Tosu 2:0. The match was played in J1 League 2024. Goals were scored by I. Sakamoto 19′, I. Jebali 84′. 1 yellow cards were shown. Sagan Tosu had 57% possession while Gamba Osaka held 43%. Sagan Tosu had 12 shots (4 on target) compared to 14 (7 on target) for Gamba Osaka. Expected goals: Sagan Tosu 1.08 — Gamba Osaka 1.32. Sagan Tosu made 5 substitutions, Gamba Osaka made 5.
Match Events
Key match events between Sagan Tosu and Gamba Osaka — 2 goals and 1 cards recorded during the match.
assist: R. Yamashita
assist: S. Kurata
Match Statistics
Sagan Tosu had 57% possession against Gamba Osaka's 43%. Sagan Tosu registered 12 shots (4 on target) while Gamba Osaka managed 14 (7 on target). Corner kicks: 6–2. Fouls committed: 10–7.
Lineups
Sagan Tosu lined up in a 4-2-3-1 formation under K. Kawai, while Gamba Osaka deployed a 4-2-3-1 under Daniel Algaba.
Squad Ratings
The overall squad rating for Sagan Tosu is —, compared to 6.92 for Gamba Osaka. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Sagan Tosu's highest-rated starter is —, while Gamba Osaka's best-rated player is R. Handa (7.19).
Attacking Output
The starting XI of Sagan Tosu have contributed 0 goals and 0 assists this season, led by —. Gamba Osaka's starters account for 13 goals and 9 assists, spearheaded by R. Yamashita (7G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.
Defensive Solidity
Sagan Tosu deploy 4 defenders rated — on average, against Gamba Osaka's 4-man backline averaging 7.01. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.
Midfield Control
Sagan Tosu field 5 midfielders averaging —, versus Gamba Osaka's 5 rated 6.83. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.
Forward Threat
Sagan Tosu start 1 forward(s) averaging —, compared to 1 for Gamba Osaka averaging —. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.
Passing & Build-Up
Passing accuracy averages —% for Sagan Tosu and 50% for Gamba Osaka. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.
Discipline
Sagan Tosu's starters have collected 0 yellow cards this season, compared to 14 for Gamba Osaka. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.
Age & Experience
The average age of Sagan Tosu's starting XI is 30.5 (youngest: S. Kimura (24), oldest: Park Il-Gyu (36)), while Gamba Osaka average 27.3 (youngest: R. Handa (23), oldest: S. Nakatani (29)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.
Squad Depth
Sagan Tosu's starters average 0 league appearances each, versus 32 for Gamba Osaka. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.
Substitutes
Substitutes
Recent Form
In their last 6 matches, Sagan Tosu have recorded 1 wins, 2 draws and 3 defeats. Gamba Osaka show 3 wins, 2 draws and 1 losses from their last 6 outings.
Sagan Tosu
Gamba Osaka
API data: 15 Mar 2026