Match Summary
Gent defeated Genk 1:0. The match was played in Jupiler Pro League 2016. Goals were scored by J. Perbet 90′. 2 yellow cards were shown. Gent made 3 substitutions, Genk made 3.
Match Events
Key match events between Gent and Genk — 1 goals and 2 cards recorded during the match.
assist: D. Miličević
Match Statistics
Gent had possession against Genk's . Gent registered 0 shots (0 on target) while Genk managed 0 (0 on target). Corner kicks: 5–6. Fouls committed: 0–0.
Lineups
Gent lined up in a — formation under H. Vanhaezebrouck, while Genk deployed a — under P. Maes.
Squad Ratings
The overall squad rating for Gent is —, compared to 7.32 for Genk. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Gent's highest-rated starter is —, while Genk's best-rated player is B. Heynen (7.32).
Attacking Output
The starting XI of Gent have contributed 0 goals and 0 assists this season, led by —. Genk's starters account for 4 goals and 1 assists, spearheaded by B. Heynen (4G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.
Defensive Solidity
Gent deploy 3 defenders rated — on average, against Genk's 3-man backline averaging —. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.
Midfield Control
Gent field 4 midfielders averaging —, versus Genk's 4 rated 7.32. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.
Forward Threat
Gent start 3 forward(s) averaging —, compared to 3 for Genk averaging —. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.
Passing & Build-Up
Passing accuracy averages —% for Gent and 87% for Genk. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.
Discipline
Gent's starters have collected 0 yellow cards this season, compared to 5 for Genk. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.
Age & Experience
The average age of Gent's starting XI is — (youngest: —, oldest: —), while Genk average 28.0 (youngest: B. Heynen (28), oldest: B. Heynen (28)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.
Squad Depth
Gent's starters average 0 league appearances each, versus 29 for Genk. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.
Substitutes
Substitutes
Recent Form
In their last 6 matches, Gent have recorded 4 wins, 0 draws and 2 defeats. Genk show 3 wins, 1 draws and 2 losses from their last 6 outings.
Gent
Genk
Head to Head
Gent and Genk have met 2 times — Gent won 0, Genk won 1, with 1 draws. Their rivalry dates back to 2025. Genk leads the head-to-head with 1 victories from 2 meetings. A combined 5 goals have been scored across these fixtures, averaging 2.50 per match (1 for the home side, 4 for the visitors). Both teams scored in 1 matches (50%). Over 2.5 goals landed in 1 games (50%), making it a fixture that tends to produce goals. The highest-scoring encounter finished 3–0 in 2026.
0
Gent
1
Drawn
1
Genk
Recent Meetings (2)
API data: 15 Mar 2026