Menu

Tranmere vs Afc Wimbledon

Prenton Park, Birkenhead, Merseyside19 November 2022 at 15:00
Referee: T. Kirk

Match Events

Tranmere
AFC Wimbledon
Kick Off
8′
E. Chislett
Josh Hawkes11′
11′Ethan Chislett
Dynel Simeu30′
J. HawkesN. Byrne
32′
Half Time
C. MerrieE. Nevitt
55′
81′
E. ChislettK. Hudlin
82′
A. Assal

assist: J. Davison

Tom Davies90+2′
Full Time

Match Statistics

3Shots on Goal5
4Shots off Goal0
12Total Shots8
5Blocked Shots3
9Shots insidebox5
3Shots outsidebox3
11Fouls10
7Corner Kicks4
2Offsides3
56%Ball Possession44%
2Yellow Cards1
1Red Cards0
3Goalkeeper Saves3
359Total passes294
228Passes accurate154
64%Passes %52%

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Tranmere is 6.78, compared to 6.56 for AFC Wimbledon. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Tranmere's highest-rated starter is L. O'Connor (6.83), while AFC Wimbledon's best-rated player is I. Ogundere (6.56).

Defensive Solidity

Tranmere deploy 4 defenders rated 6.72 on average, against AFC Wimbledon's 4-man backline averaging 6.56. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

Tranmere field 4 midfielders averaging 6.83, versus AFC Wimbledon's 5 rated —. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

Tranmere start 2 forward(s) averaging —, compared to 1 for AFC Wimbledon averaging —. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 67% for Tranmere and 71% for AFC Wimbledon. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Tranmere's starters have collected 4 yellow cards this season, compared to 5 for AFC Wimbledon. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Tranmere's starting XI is 24.5 (youngest: E. Bristow (24), oldest: L. O'Connor (25)), while AFC Wimbledon average 23.0 (youngest: I. Ogundere (23), oldest: I. Ogundere (23)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Tranmere's starters average 15 league appearances each, versus 46 for AFC Wimbledon. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Tranmere4-4-24-2-3-1AFC Wimbledon
GKDEFMIDFWD
1Doohan2Dacres-.5Davies26Simeu3Bristow7Morris4O'Connor6Merrie11Hawkes10Hemmings22Lewis1Tzanev33Ogundere30Kalamba.12Towler20Biler4Woodyard19Maghoma11Chislett8Pell10Assal9Davison

Substitutes

Coach: M. Mellon

Substitutes

Coach: J. Jackson

TranmerePosition StrengthAFC Wimbledon
6.78
Avg Rating
6.56
6.72Defender (4 v 4)6.56
0G 1A0G 1A
6.83Midfielder (4 v 5)
0G 0A0G 0A
Tranmere4-4-2
1GoalkeeperR. Doohan
2DefenderJ. Dacres-Cogley
5DefenderT. Davies
26DefenderD. Simeu
3DefenderE. Bristow6.71A
7MidfielderK. Morris
4MidfielderL. O'Connor6.8
6MidfielderC. Merrie
11MidfielderJ. Hawkes
10ForwardK. Hemmings
22ForwardP. Lewis
AFC Wimbledon4-2-3-1
1GoalkeeperN. Tzanev
33DefenderI. Ogundere6.61A
30DefenderP. Kalambayi
12DefenderR. Towler
20DefenderH. Biler
4MidfielderA. Woodyard
19MidfielderP. Maghoma
11MidfielderE. Chislett
8MidfielderH. Pell
10MidfielderA. Assal
9ForwardJ. Davison

Match Summary

AFC Wimbledon defeated Tranmere 2:0. The match was played in League Two 2022. Goals were scored by E. Chislett 8′, A. Assal 82′. 3 yellow cards were shown, 1 red cards. Tranmere had 56% possession while AFC Wimbledon held 44%. Tranmere had 12 shots (3 on target) compared to 8 (5 on target) for AFC Wimbledon. Tranmere made 2 substitutions, AFC Wimbledon made 1.

Rivalry since 2014

Tranmere vs AFC Wimbledon Head to Head Results

8 stretnutí
Tranmere
2
wins
Drawn
3
AFC Wimbledon
3
wins
Total goals
23 · 2.9/match
Both scored
5/8 · 63%
Over 2.5
3/8 · 38%

Recent Form

Tranmere

DLWLDL

AFC Wimbledon

LWLLLL

Betting Odds & Historical Data

Opening pre-match odds recorded for this fixture at the time it was played. These are historical figures for analytical reference only and do not reflect any current market.

Historical data only — not for betting

This data is sourced from football-data.co.uk and covers historical match results and pre-match odds. These figures do not represent current or live odds and cannot be used for placing bets. Betting is not possible on this website. Provided for analytical and research purposes only.

Head-to-Head Record

Even record

Historical results between these two teams — showing who has dominated this fixture and whether the current odds reflect that pattern.

Tranmere1wins
3draws8 meetings
AFC Wimbledon4wins

Goals in This Fixture

How many goals these two teams typically produce when they meet, based on their historical encounters.

3

Average goals per game

38%

Games with 3+ goals

63%

Both teams scored

Potential Betting Value Detected

Historical win rate (25%) differs significantly from the market-implied probability (49%) — the odds may underestimate AFC Wimbledon.

Market Summary

Margin: 5.6%

Implied win probabilities calculated from pre-match odds across multiple sources. A higher percentage means the market considered that outcome more likely. Compare these against your own assessment to spot potential value.

Implied Probability

Home 50.5%Draw 29.9%Away 25.2%

Odds Range

1X2
Min1.943.303.80
Max2.003.454.12
Over 2.5: 46.5%Under 2.5: 60.2%
Market favourite:Tranmere · Slight favourite

Market Consensus

Professional markets (sharp bookmakers) reflect sharp money and are harder to beat. Public markets are softer. When the two disagree significantly (highlighted in amber), it may indicate a mispriced line worth investigating.

1X2
Professional market49.2%27.7%23.2%
Public market47.5%28.8%23.7%
Δ1.7%1.1%0.6%

Tranmere vs AFC Wimbledon — margin-removed probabilities

Result vs. Market

AFC Wimbledon
Result vs. Market: Tranmere (51%)

Result differed from market prediction

Match Statistics

Actual in-game statistics recorded for this match. Shots on target is a strong indicator of attacking pressure and correlates well with expected goals.

TranmereHalf-time:01AFC Wimbledon
12Shots8
3Shots on target5

Head-to-Head History

Historical results between these two teams. Bold odds show which outcome was backed by the market — compare against the actual result to assess predictability of this fixture over time.

DateHomeScoreAwayAvg. odds
18/01/25AFC Wimbledon2–0Tranmere1.58/3.78/5.98
26/11/24Tranmere0–2AFC Wimbledon3.60/3.17/2.15
20/04/24Tranmere3–2AFC Wimbledon3.03/3.31/2.38
30/09/23AFC Wimbledon4–1Tranmere1.71/3.81/4.94
29/04/23AFC Wimbledon1–1Tranmere2.30/3.22/3.24
19/11/22Tranmere0–2AFC Wimbledon1.98/3.35/3.97
25/10/14AFC Wimbledon2–2Tranmere2.22/3.44/3.26
28/03/15Tranmere1–1AFC Wimbledon2.49/3.29/3.02

Home Record / Away Record

Aggregated season statistics from all available historical data. Use these to assess each team's overall form, scoring frequency, and tendency for high-scoring matches.

Home Record: Tranmere

W 124D 95L 149
Over 2.542
Goals scored427

Away Record: AFC Wimbledon

W 126D 104L 138
Over 2.544
Goals scored451

Data: football-data.co.uk

Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026