Menu

Afc Wimbledon vs Grimsby

The Cherry Red Records Stadium, London3 December 2022 at 12:30
Referee: D. Handley

Match Events

AFC Wimbledon
Grimsby
Kick Off
Huseyin Biler34′
45+10′
M. EfeteA. Smith
Half Time
Paul Kalambayi49′
E. Chislett

assist: H. Pell

60′
Harry Pell66′
72′
B. KiernanK. Simmonds
77′
O. KhanA. Pepple
78′Keyendrah Simmonds
E. ChislettK. Hudlin
85′
Full Time

Match Statistics

2Shots on Goal1
6Shots off Goal5
12Total Shots6
4Blocked Shots0
9Shots insidebox5
3Shots outsidebox1
9Fouls18
5Corner Kicks4
5Offsides4
50%Ball Possession50%
3Yellow Cards1
0Red Cards0
1Goalkeeper Saves1
352Total passes354
195Passes accurate215
55%Passes %61%

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for AFC Wimbledon is —, compared to 6.91 for Grimsby. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. AFC Wimbledon's highest-rated starter is —, while Grimsby's best-rated player is K. Green (7.00).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of AFC Wimbledon have contributed 0 goals and 0 assists this season, led by —. Grimsby's starters account for 17 goals and 7 assists, spearheaded by K. Green (13G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

AFC Wimbledon deploy 4 defenders rated — on average, against Grimsby's 4-man backline averaging 6.82. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

AFC Wimbledon field 5 midfielders averaging —, versus Grimsby's 5 rated 7.00. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

AFC Wimbledon start 1 forward(s) averaging —, compared to 1 for Grimsby averaging —. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages —% for AFC Wimbledon and 66% for Grimsby. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

AFC Wimbledon's starters have collected 0 yellow cards this season, compared to 8 for Grimsby. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of AFC Wimbledon's starting XI is — (youngest: —, oldest: —), while Grimsby average 25.0 (youngest: E. Khouri (22), oldest: K. Green (28)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

AFC Wimbledon's starters average 0 league appearances each, versus 37 for Grimsby. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

AFC Wimbledon4-2-3-14-1-4-1Grimsby
GKDEFMIDFWD
1Tzanev20Biler30Kalamba.12Towler26Currie4Woodyard19Maghoma11Chislett8Pell10Assal9Davison1Crocombe2Efete6Waterfa.31Maher30Khouri4Green27Kiernan8Holohan15Clifton11Khan10McAtee

Substitutes

Coach: J. Jackson

Substitutes

Coach: P. Hurst

AFC WimbledonPosition StrengthGrimsby
Avg Rating
6.91
Defender (4 v 4)6.82
0G 0A4G 2A
Midfielder (5 v 5)7.00
0G 0A13G 5A
AFC Wimbledon4-2-3-1
1GoalkeeperN. Tzanev
20DefenderH. Biler
30DefenderP. Kalambayi
12DefenderR. Towler
26DefenderJ. Currie
4MidfielderA. Woodyard
19MidfielderP. Maghoma
11MidfielderE. Chislett
8MidfielderH. Pell
10MidfielderA. Assal
9ForwardJ. Davison
Grimsby4-1-4-1
1GoalkeeperM. Crocombe
2DefenderM. Efete
6DefenderL. Waterfall
31DefenderN. Maher
30DefenderE. Khouri6.84G2A
4MidfielderK. Green7.013G5A
27MidfielderB. Kiernan
8MidfielderG. Holohan
15MidfielderH. Clifton
11MidfielderO. Khan
10ForwardJ. McAtee

Match Summary

AFC Wimbledon defeated Grimsby 1:0. The match was played in League Two 2022. Goals were scored by E. Chislett 60′. 4 yellow cards were shown. AFC Wimbledon had 50% possession while Grimsby held 50%. AFC Wimbledon had 12 shots (2 on target) compared to 6 (1 on target) for Grimsby. AFC Wimbledon made 1 substitutions, Grimsby made 3.

Rivalry since 2023

AFC Wimbledon vs Grimsby Head to Head Results

5 stretnutí
AFC Wimbledon
1
wins
Drawn
2
Grimsby
2
wins
Total goals
3 · 0.6/match
Both scored
0/5 · 0%
Over 2.5
0/5 · 0%

Recent Form

AFC Wimbledon

LWLLLL

Grimsby

DWWWLW

Betting Odds & Historical Data

Opening pre-match odds recorded for this fixture at the time it was played. These are historical figures for analytical reference only and do not reflect any current market.

Historical data only — not for betting

This data is sourced from football-data.co.uk and covers historical match results and pre-match odds. These figures do not represent current or live odds and cannot be used for placing bets. Betting is not possible on this website. Provided for analytical and research purposes only.

Head-to-Head Record

Even record

Historical results between these two teams — showing who has dominated this fixture and whether the current odds reflect that pattern.

AFC Wimbledon2wins
2draws6 meetings
Grimsby2wins

Goals in This Fixture

How many goals these two teams typically produce when they meet, based on their historical encounters.

0.7

Average goals per game

0%

Games with 3+ goals

0%

Both teams scored

Market Summary

Margin: 5.1%

Implied win probabilities calculated from pre-match odds across multiple sources. A higher percentage means the market considered that outcome more likely. Compare these against your own assessment to spot potential value.

Implied Probability

Home 32.2%Draw 31.1%Away 41.7%

Odds Range

1X2
Min3.103.102.35
Max3.113.302.48
Over 2.5: 46.5%Under 2.5: 60.2%
Market favourite: · Even contest

Market Consensus

Professional markets (sharp bookmakers) reflect sharp money and are harder to beat. Public markets are softer. When the two disagree significantly (highlighted in amber), it may indicate a mispriced line worth investigating.

1X2
Professional market31.1%29.9%39.0%
Public market30.8%28.9%40.3%
Δ0.3%0.9%1.3%

AFC Wimbledon vs Grimsby — margin-removed probabilities

Result vs. Market

AFC Wimbledon
Result vs. Market: Grimsby (42%)

Result differed from market prediction

Match Statistics

Actual in-game statistics recorded for this match. Shots on target is a strong indicator of attacking pressure and correlates well with expected goals.

AFC WimbledonHalf-time:00Grimsby
12Shots6
2Shots on target1

Head-to-Head History

Historical results between these two teams. Bold odds show which outcome was backed by the market — compare against the actual result to assess predictability of this fixture over time.

DateHomeScoreAwayAvg. odds
03/05/25Grimsby0–1AFC Wimbledon2.67/3.17/2.63
09/11/24AFC Wimbledon0–1Grimsby1.49/4.28/6.26
05/03/24AFC Wimbledon0–0Grimsby1.86/3.60/4.18
05/08/23Grimsby0–0AFC Wimbledon2.00/3.35/3.69
08/05/23Grimsby1–0AFC Wimbledon1.85/3.51/4.22
03/12/22AFC Wimbledon1–0Grimsby3.10/3.21/2.40

Home Record / Away Record

Aggregated season statistics from all available historical data. Use these to assess each team's overall form, scoring frequency, and tendency for high-scoring matches.

Home Record: AFC Wimbledon

W 126D 104L 138
Over 2.544
Goals scored451

Away Record: Grimsby

W 223D 181L 277
Over 2.548
Goals scored792

Data: football-data.co.uk

Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026