Menu

Crewe vs Afc Wimbledon

Mornflake Stadium, Crewe, Cheshire7 January 2023 at 15:00
Home

Crewe

00
Referee: C. Pollard

Match Events

Crewe
AFC Wimbledon
Kick Off
Half Time
66′
C. SeniorN. Young-Coombes
Lachlan Brook72′
73′Lee Brown
T. UwakweC. Ainley
78′
84′George Marsh
85′
J. DavisonZ. Robinson
L. BrookJ. Tabiner
88′
Full Time

Match Statistics

2Shots on Goal1
4Shots off Goal4
9Total Shots8
3Blocked Shots3
6Shots insidebox3
3Shots outsidebox5
15Fouls14
4Corner Kicks4
0Offsides1
57%Ball Possession43%
1Yellow Cards2
0Red Cards0
2Goalkeeper Saves2
401Total passes299
269Passes accurate155
67%Passes %52%

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Crewe is 6.85, compared to — for AFC Wimbledon. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Crewe's highest-rated starter is C. Thomas (6.85), while AFC Wimbledon's best-rated player is —.

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Crewe have contributed 3 goals and 0 assists this season, led by C. Thomas (3G). AFC Wimbledon's starters account for 0 goals and 0 assists, spearheaded by —. Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

Crewe deploy 4 defenders rated — on average, against AFC Wimbledon's 5-man backline averaging —. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

Crewe field 4 midfielders averaging 6.85, versus AFC Wimbledon's 4 rated —. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

Crewe start 2 forward(s) averaging —, compared to 1 for AFC Wimbledon averaging —. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 67% for Crewe and —% for AFC Wimbledon. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Crewe's starters have collected 1 yellow cards this season, compared to 0 for AFC Wimbledon. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Crewe's starting XI is 32.0 (youngest: C. Thomas (32), oldest: C. Thomas (32)), while AFC Wimbledon average — (youngest: —, oldest: —). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Crewe's starters average 27 league appearances each, versus 0 for AFC Wimbledon. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Crewe4-4-25-4-1AFC Wimbledon
GKDEFMIDFWD
13Okonkwo2Mellor15O'Riord.5McDonald3Adebisi17Brook12Griffit.8Thomas21Uwakwe19Sambou11Agyei1Tzanev20Biler15Pearce30Kalamba.3Brown26Currie11Chislett8Pell6Marsh25Senior9Davison

Substitutes

Coach: L. Bell

Substitutes

Coach: J. Jackson

CrewePosition StrengthAFC Wimbledon
6.85
Avg Rating
6.85Midfielder (4 v 4)
3G 0A0G 0A
Crewe4-4-2
13GoalkeeperA. Okonkwo
2DefenderK. Mellor
15DefenderC. O'Riordan
5DefenderR. McDonald
3DefenderR. Adebisi
17MidfielderL. Brook
12MidfielderR. Griffiths
8MidfielderC. Thomas6.83G
21MidfielderT. Uwakwe
19ForwardB. Sambou
11ForwardD. Agyei
AFC Wimbledon5-4-1
1GoalkeeperN. Tzanev
20DefenderH. Biler
15DefenderA. Pearce
30DefenderP. Kalambayi
3DefenderL. Brown
26DefenderJ. Currie
11MidfielderE. Chislett
8MidfielderH. Pell
6MidfielderG. Marsh
25MidfielderC. Senior
9ForwardJ. Davison

Match Summary

Crewe and AFC Wimbledon drew 0:0. The match was played in League Two 2022. 3 yellow cards were shown. Crewe had 57% possession while AFC Wimbledon held 43%. Crewe had 9 shots (2 on target) compared to 8 (1 on target) for AFC Wimbledon. Crewe made 2 substitutions, AFC Wimbledon made 2.

Rivalry since 2011

Crewe vs AFC Wimbledon Head to Head Results

11 stretnutí
Crewe
3
wins
Drawn
6
AFC Wimbledon
2
wins
Total goals
37 · 3.4/match
Both scored
10/11 · 91%
Over 2.5
7/11 · 64%

Recent Form

Crewe

DLLLWL

AFC Wimbledon

LWLLLL

Betting Odds & Historical Data

Opening pre-match odds recorded for this fixture at the time it was played. These are historical figures for analytical reference only and do not reflect any current market.

Historical data only — not for betting

This data is sourced from football-data.co.uk and covers historical match results and pre-match odds. These figures do not represent current or live odds and cannot be used for placing bets. Betting is not possible on this website. Provided for analytical and research purposes only.

Head-to-Head Record

Even record

Historical results between these two teams — showing who has dominated this fixture and whether the current odds reflect that pattern.

Crewe1wins
6draws8 meetings
AFC Wimbledon1wins

Goals in This Fixture

How many goals these two teams typically produce when they meet, based on their historical encounters.

2.9

Average goals per game

50%

Games with 3+ goals

75%

Both teams scored

Potential Betting Value Detected

Historical win rate (0%) differs significantly from the market-implied probability (33%) — the odds may underestimate AFC Wimbledon.

Market Summary

Margin: 5.4%

Implied win probabilities calculated from pre-match odds across multiple sources. A higher percentage means the market considered that outcome more likely. Compare these against your own assessment to spot potential value.

Implied Probability

Home 34.4%Draw 31.3%Away 39.7%

Odds Range

1X2
Min2.883.102.50
Max2.953.302.55
Over 2.5: 46.5%Under 2.5: 59.9%
Market favourite: · Even contest

Market Consensus

Professional markets (sharp bookmakers) reflect sharp money and are harder to beat. Public markets are softer. When the two disagree significantly (highlighted in amber), it may indicate a mispriced line worth investigating.

1X2
Professional market32.8%29.3%37.9%
Public market32.6%29.6%37.8%

Crewe vs AFC Wimbledon — margin-removed probabilities

Result vs. Market

Draw
Result vs. Market: AFC Wimbledon (40%)

Result differed from market prediction

Match Statistics

Actual in-game statistics recorded for this match. Shots on target is a strong indicator of attacking pressure and correlates well with expected goals.

CreweHalf-time:00AFC Wimbledon
9Shots8
2Shots on target1

Head-to-Head History

Historical results between these two teams. Bold odds show which outcome was backed by the market — compare against the actual result to assess predictability of this fixture over time.

DateHomeScoreAwayAvg. odds
25/02/12Crewe3–3AFC Wimbledon2.01/3.35/3.41
11/02/25AFC Wimbledon3–0Crewe1.74/3.32/5.21
28/01/25Crewe1–1AFC Wimbledon2.73/2.88/2.92
23/03/24Crewe1–1AFC Wimbledon2.58/3.25/2.82
16/09/23AFC Wimbledon2–2Crewe1.74/3.75/4.21
07/01/23Crewe0–0AFC Wimbledon2.91/3.20/2.52
25/10/22AFC Wimbledon1–1Crewe2.24/3.34/3.27
15/10/11AFC Wimbledon1–3Crewe1.91/3.54/3.77

Home Record / Away Record

Aggregated season statistics from all available historical data. Use these to assess each team's overall form, scoring frequency, and tendency for high-scoring matches.

Home Record: Crewe

W 190D 125L 182
Over 2.551
Goals scored699

Away Record: AFC Wimbledon

W 126D 104L 138
Over 2.544
Goals scored451

Data: football-data.co.uk

Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026