Menu

Panevezys Ii vs Kauno Zalgiris Ii

Full Time

1 Lyga · Season 2025

Panevėžio futbolo akademijos stadionas, Panevėžys28 April 2025 at 16:00

Match Events

Panevėžys II
Kauno Žalgiris II
Kick Off
D. Chaplanov24′
Half Time
50′
G. BuslysD. Bovhyra
54′
T. Stelmokas

Penalty

D. BalsysE. Puikis
56′
J. Okpanachi
59′
61′
A. Rybelis
J. Okpanachi
65′
R. Lazdinauskas70′
72′
M. BruzasR. Matekonis
72′
A. LipciusJ. Vizinis
A. Karvatskyi77′
J. OkpanachiA. Jusys
80′
M. Jakubauskas

Own Goal

81′
82′
J. JankauskasY. Ovsianko
E. DzingaA. Slikas
87′
R. LazdinauskasR. Kulbis
87′
R. MisiunasM. Pusnys
87′
D. Chaplanov88′
Full Time

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Panevėžys II is 6.53, compared to — for Kauno Žalgiris II. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Panevėžys II's highest-rated starter is D. Bukel (7.35), while Kauno Žalgiris II's best-rated player is —.

Midfield Control

Panevėžys II field 11 midfielders averaging 6.53, versus Kauno Žalgiris II's 11 rated —. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 77% for Panevėžys II and —% for Kauno Žalgiris II. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Panevėžys II's starters have collected 1 yellow cards this season, compared to 0 for Kauno Žalgiris II. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Panevėžys II's starting XI is 20.3 (youngest: D. Balsys (17), oldest: D. Bukel (22)), while Kauno Žalgiris II average — (youngest: —, oldest: —). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Panevėžys II's starters average 1 league appearances each, versus 0 for Kauno Žalgiris II. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Panevėžys IIPosition StrengthKauno Žalgiris II
6.53
Avg Rating
6.53Midfielder (11 v 11)
0G 0A0G 0A
Panevėžys II
13MidfielderD. Bukel7.3
10MidfielderR. Misiunas
11MidfielderR. Lazdinauskas
16MidfielderK. Sonkevicius
23MidfielderE. Dzinga6.3
29MidfielderJ. Okpanachi
30MidfielderA. Slobodian
34MidfielderI. Asante
55MidfielderD. Chaplanov
66MidfielderD. Balsys5.9
97MidfielderA. Karvatskyi
Kauno Žalgiris II
1MidfielderM. Ukelis
41MidfielderA. Rybelis
45MidfielderA. Lipcius
46MidfielderT. Milius
48MidfielderT. Stelmokas
49MidfielderM. Jakubauskas
50MidfielderG. Buslys
53MidfielderA. Slivinskas
54MidfielderM. Bruzas
61MidfielderJ. Jankauskas
83MidfielderP. Nainys

Match Summary

Panevėžys II defeated Kauno Žalgiris II 4:2. The match was played in 1 Lyga 2025. Goals were scored by I. Asante 5′, T. Stelmokas 54′ (pen.), J. Okpanachi 59′, A. Rybelis 61′, J. Okpanachi 65′, M. Jakubauskas 81′ (o.g.). 4 yellow cards were shown, 1 red card. Panevėžys II made 5 substitutions, Kauno Žalgiris II made 4.

Rivalry since 2020

Panevėžys II vs Kauno Žalgiris II Head to Head Results

8 stretnutí
Panevėžys II
3
wins
Drawn
1
Kauno Žalgiris II
4
wins
Total goals
26 · 3.3/match
Both scored
4/8 · 50%
Over 2.5
5/8 · 63%

Recent Form

Panevėžys II

LLLLDL

Kauno Žalgiris II

LLLLLL

Match Prediction

Panevėžys II

10%

Home win

 

45%

Draw

Kauno Žalgiris II

45%

Away win

Model advice

Double chance : draw or Kauno Žalgiris II

44%Form56%
67%Attack33%
20%Defence80%
29%Head-to-head71%
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026