Menu

Tec vs Quick Boys

Sportpark De Lok, Tiel6 April 2022 at 19:00
Home

TEC

22
Referee: D. Serik

Match Events

TEC
Quick Boys
Kick Off
11′
Y. El Kachati

assist: N. Runderkamp

D. Blij

assist: B. van Essen

19′
36′D. Maatsen
M. El Makrini43′
44′
T. Bekooij

assist: J. Ket

Half Time
G. van RijnJ. Wall
54′
R. KloosterV. Vermeer
61′
63′
M. MahmoedM. van den Ban
63′
L. van DuijnC. Bosman
66′J. Kamp
G. Bosz

Penalty

67′
73′M. van den Ban
73′N. Nwankwo
B. van Essen76′
77′
T. BekooijK. van Kippersluis
77′
D. MaatsenF. Lewis
86′Y. El Kachati
M. El Makrini90+7′
M. El Makrini90+7′
90+8′N. Runderkamp
D. BlijT. Schalekamp
90+2′
Full Time

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for TEC is —, compared to 6.70 for Quick Boys. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. TEC's highest-rated starter is —, while Quick Boys's best-rated player is L. van Duijn (6.70).

Midfield Control

TEC field 11 midfielders averaging —, versus Quick Boys's 11 rated 6.70. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages —% for TEC and 60% for Quick Boys. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Age & Experience

The average age of TEC's starting XI is — (youngest: —, oldest: —), while Quick Boys average 23.0 (youngest: L. van Duijn (23), oldest: L. van Duijn (23)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

TEC's starters average 0 league appearances each, versus 1 for Quick Boys. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

TECPosition StrengthQuick Boys
Avg Rating
6.70
Midfielder (11 v 11)6.70
0G 0A0G 0A
TEC
1MidfielderM. Swaneveld
25MidfielderB. Beijer
5MidfielderG. van Rijn
3MidfielderT. van der Neut
6MidfielderG. Bosz
2MidfielderR. Klooster
16MidfielderM. El Makrini
8MidfielderM. Vreekamp
10MidfielderD. Blij
9MidfielderJ. Ebobo
7MidfielderB. van Essen
Quick Boys
1MidfielderP. van der Helm
14MidfielderJ. Ket
15MidfielderN. Nwankwo
6MidfielderM. Mahmoed
4MidfielderJ. Kamp
30MidfielderN. Runderkamp
16MidfielderL. van Kleef
29MidfielderL. van Duijn6.7
7MidfielderT. Bekooij
11MidfielderD. Maatsen
18MidfielderY. El Kachati

Match Summary

TEC and Quick Boys drew 2:2. The match was played in Tweede Divisie 2021. Goals were scored by Y. El Kachati 11′, D. Blij 19′, T. Bekooij 44′, G. Bosz 67′ (pen.). 7 yellow cards were shown, 3 red cards. TEC made 3 substitutions, Quick Boys made 4.

Rivalry since 2019

TEC vs Quick Boys Head to Head Results

5 stretnutí
TEC
1
wins
Drawn
0
Quick Boys
4
wins
Total goals
12 · 2.4/match
Both scored
2/5 · 40%
Over 2.5
2/5 · 40%

Recent Form

TEC

WLWDLW

Quick Boys

WWWWDW
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026