Menu

Gj Vik Lyn vs Eidsvold

Gjøvik stadion, Gjøvik7 September 2024 at 13:00
02
Referee: J. Mertens

Match Events

Gjøvik-Lyn
Eidsvold
Kick Off
17′
H. Henriksen
Half Time
O. HagenL. Tveten
46′
E. NilssonJ. Helan
46′
T. KristiansenJ. Karlsson
46′
J. KarlssonH. Gashnjani
50′
M. RasoliT. Wirkestad
69′
71′
V. Kaba
75′
H. HenriksenB. Notoane
75′
S. StensethM. Sørensen
75′
F. DelaverisK. Bandeh
83′
O. StensethM. Nygård
88′
C. Morala NotoaneS. Stokke
A. Nihorimbere90′
Full Time

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Gjøvik-Lyn is —, compared to 6.63 for Eidsvold. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Gjøvik-Lyn's highest-rated starter is —, while Eidsvold's best-rated player is S. Stenseth (7.08).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Gjøvik-Lyn have contributed 0 goals and 0 assists this season, led by —. Eidsvold's starters account for 15 goals and 3 assists, spearheaded by V. Kaba (4G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Midfield Control

Gjøvik-Lyn field 11 midfielders averaging —, versus Eidsvold's 11 rated 6.63. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages —% for Gjøvik-Lyn and 82% for Eidsvold. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Gjøvik-Lyn's starters have collected 0 yellow cards this season, compared to 10 for Eidsvold. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Gjøvik-Lyn's starting XI is 24.0 (youngest: T. Kristiansen (20), oldest: Rafael Veloso (32)), while Eidsvold average 25.1 (youngest: P. Hokstad (20), oldest: V. Kaba (31)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Gjøvik-Lyn's starters average 0 league appearances each, versus 9 for Eidsvold. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Gjøvik-LynPosition StrengthEidsvold
Avg Rating
6.63
Midfielder (11 v 11)6.63
0G 0A15G 3A
Gjøvik-Lyn
1MidfielderRafael Veloso
4MidfielderP. Jansen
18MidfielderA. Nihorimbere
3MidfielderT. Kristiansen
5MidfielderA. Bjørnhaug
11MidfielderM. Volden
21MidfielderK. Thorvaldsen
17MidfielderM. Rasoli
8MidfielderJ. Pettersen
16MidfielderO. Hagen
20MidfielderE. Nilsson
Eidsvold
12MidfielderV. Storsve6.1
8MidfielderO. Stenseth6.61G2A
6MidfielderK. Håkenstad6.0
3MidfielderC. Morala Notoane6.71G
2MidfielderH. Thorkildsen1G
23MidfielderE. Øy6.81G
16MidfielderF. Delaveris
20MidfielderP. Hokstad
9MidfielderH. Henriksen7.13G
77MidfielderV. Kaba6.84G
17MidfielderS. Stenseth7.14G1A

Match Summary

Eidsvold defeated Gjøvik-Lyn 2:0. The match was played in 2. Division - Group 2 2024. Goals were scored by H. Henriksen 17′, V. Kaba 71′. 2 yellow cards were shown. Gjøvik-Lyn made 5 substitutions, Eidsvold made 5.

Rivalry since 2022

Gjøvik-Lyn vs Eidsvold Head to Head Results

4 stretnutí
Gjøvik-Lyn
1
wins
Drawn
1
Eidsvold
2
wins
Total goals
13 · 3.3/match
Both scored
3/4 · 75%
Over 2.5
3/4 · 75%

Recent Form

Gjøvik-Lyn

WWWLWD

Eidsvold

LWWLWW

Match Prediction

Gjøvik-Lyn

0%

Home win

 

50%

Draw

Eidsvold

50%

Away win

Model advice

Winner : Eidsvold

0%Form100%
13%Attack88%
41%Defence59%
36%Head-to-head64%
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026