Menu

Racing Louisville W vs Bay Fc

Lynn Family Stadium, Louisville2 November 2025 at 22:15

Match Events

Racing Louisville W
Bay FC
Kick Off
Arin Wright6′
Half Time
46′
M. MoreauA. Malonson
46′
J. AndersonT. Boade
46′
P. HockingR. Hill
E. Hase

assist: K. O'Kane

48′
Taylor Flint57′
K. O'KaneM. DiGrande
66′
K. FischerS. Weber
66′
68′Caroline Conti
71′
C. ContiD. Bailey
E. HaseB. Balcer
90+4′
Full Time

Match Statistics

6Shots on Goal0
11Shots off Goal1
22Total Shots4
5Blocked Shots3
14Shots insidebox0
8Shots outsidebox4
9Fouls9
9Corner Kicks4
2Offsides0
47%Ball Possession53%
3Yellow Cards1
0Red Cards0
0Goalkeeper Saves5
281Total passes335
218Passes accurate256
78%Passes %76%
0expected_goals0
0goals_prevented0

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Racing Louisville W is 6.94, compared to 6.83 for Bay FC. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Racing Louisville W's highest-rated starter is T. Flint (7.44), while Bay FC's best-rated player is T. Huff (6.97).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Racing Louisville W have contributed 20 goals and 9 assists this season, led by E. Sears (9G). Bay FC's starters account for 13 goals and 6 assists, spearheaded by P. Hocking (6G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

Racing Louisville W deploy 4 defenders rated 6.82 on average, against Bay FC's 2-man backline averaging 6.86. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

Racing Louisville W field 5 midfielders averaging 7.04, versus Bay FC's 7 rated 6.84. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

Racing Louisville W start 1 forward(s) averaging 6.86, compared to 1 for Bay FC averaging 6.73. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages —% for Racing Louisville W and 44% for Bay FC. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Racing Louisville W's starters have collected 23 yellow cards this season, compared to 15 for Bay FC. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Racing Louisville W's starting XI is 27.9 (youngest: E. Sears (24), oldest: A. Wright (33)), while Bay FC average 25.6 (youngest: K. Lema (22), oldest: C. Dydasco (32)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Racing Louisville W's starters average 23 league appearances each, versus 21 for Bay FC. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Racing Louisville W4-1-4-14-2-3-1Bay FC
GKDEFMIDFWD
24Bloomer2Milliet5Jean3Wright16Sonis26Flint13Sears20O'Kane8Borges6Hase9Fischer29Silkowi.3Dydasco16Collins22Courtna.24Moreau18Anderson41Bebar7Huff15Conti55Hocking5Lema

Substitutes

Coach: Beverly Goebel Yanez

Substitutes

Coach: Albertin Montoya

Racing Louisville WPosition StrengthBay FC
6.94
Avg Rating
6.83
7.23Goalkeeper (1 v 1)6.83
0G 0A0G 0A
6.82Defender (4 v 2)6.86
3G 4A0G 1A
7.04Midfielder (5 v 7)6.84
13G 2A11G 4A
6.86Forward (1 v 1)6.73
4G 3A2G 1A
Racing Louisville W4-1-4-1
24GoalkeeperJ. Bloomer7.2
2DefenderL. Milliet6.9
5DefenderE. Jean6.6
3DefenderA. Wright6.81G2A
16DefenderJ. Sonis7.02G2A
26MidfielderT. Flint7.43G1A
13MidfielderE. Sears6.99G1A
20MidfielderK. O'Kane
8MidfielderAry Borges6.81G
6MidfielderE. Hase
9ForwardK. Fischer6.94G3A
Bay FC4-2-3-1
29GoalkeeperJ. Silkowitz6.8
3DefenderC. Dydasco6.91A
16DefenderS. Collins6.9
22MidfielderB. Courtnall
24MidfielderM. Moreau
18MidfielderJ. Anderson6.81G2A
41MidfielderH. Bebar6.81A
7MidfielderT. Huff7.04G1A
15MidfielderC. Conti
55MidfielderP. Hocking6.86G
5ForwardK. Lema6.72G1A

Match Summary

Racing Louisville W defeated Bay FC 1:0. The match was played in NWSL Women 2025. Goals were scored by E. Hase 48′. 4 yellow cards were shown. Racing Louisville W had 47% possession while Bay FC held 53%. Racing Louisville W had 22 shots (6 on target) compared to 4 (0 on target) for Bay FC. Racing Louisville W made 3 substitutions, Bay FC made 4.

Rivalry since 2024

Racing Louisville W vs Bay FC Head to Head Results

3 stretnutí
Racing Louisville W
0
wins
Drawn
0
Bay FC
3
wins
Total goals
4 · 1.3/match
Both scored
0/3 · 0%
Over 2.5
0/3 · 0%

Recent Form

Racing Louisville W

DWDDWW

Bay FC

LLDLLD
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026