Menu

Chicago Red Stars W vs North Carolina Courage W

SeatGeek Stadium, Bridgeview23 August 2025 at 01:00

Match Events

Chicago Red Stars W
North Carolina Courage W
Kick Off
Half Time
L. NesbethJ. Grosso
46′
J. JosephLudmila
46′
49′
M. Matsukubo

assist: A. Sanchez

56′
Aline GomesM. Berkely
M. Lopez MillanM. Hayashi
64′
N. GomesM. Johnson
64′
71′
B. A. PintoJ. Shaw
71′
T. LussiM. Speck
Ludmila

assist: S. Staab

76′
Ludmila

assist: S. Staab

81′
K. HendrichA. Cook
82′
83′
J. Shaw

assist: M. Speck

Ludmila

assist: M. Hayashi

86′
Full Time

Match Statistics

6Shots on Goal6
3Shots off Goal3
10Total Shots12
1Blocked Shots3
8Shots insidebox8
2Shots outsidebox4
13Fouls6
4Corner Kicks7
0Offsides3
36%Ball Possession64%
3Yellow Cards1
0Red Cards0
3Goalkeeper Saves3
260Total passes475
175Passes accurate379
67%Passes %80%
0expected_goals0
0goals_prevented0

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Chicago Red Stars W is 6.58, compared to 7.10 for North Carolina Courage W. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Chicago Red Stars W's highest-rated starter is N. Gomes (6.77), while North Carolina Courage W's best-rated player is A. Sanchez (7.35).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Chicago Red Stars W have contributed 1 goals and 0 assists this season, led by N. Gomes (1G). North Carolina Courage W's starters account for 7 goals and 5 assists, spearheaded by A. Sanchez (5G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

Chicago Red Stars W deploy 2 defenders rated 6.72 on average, against North Carolina Courage W's 2-man backline averaging 7.09. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

Chicago Red Stars W field 7 midfielders averaging 6.54, versus North Carolina Courage W's 6 rated 7.04. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

Chicago Red Stars W start 1 forward(s) averaging —, compared to 2 for North Carolina Courage W averaging 7.35. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 79% for Chicago Red Stars W and 79% for North Carolina Courage W. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Chicago Red Stars W's starters have collected 3 yellow cards this season, compared to 2 for North Carolina Courage W. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Chicago Red Stars W's starting XI is 28.6 (youngest: J. Joseph (23), oldest: A. Naeher (37)), while North Carolina Courage W average 23.5 (youngest: R. Jackson (20), oldest: R. Williams (29)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Chicago Red Stars W's starters average 6 league appearances each, versus 7 for North Carolina Courage W. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Chicago Red Stars W4-2-3-13-4-3North Carolina Courage W
GKDEFMIDFWD
1Naeher30Biegals.6Hendrich3Staab32Malham8Joseph13Nesbeth20Franklin77Millan26Gomes34Schlegel1Murphy13Williams3Kurtz27Bell77Gomes16Jackson20Koyama14Lussi34Matsuku.8Pinto2Sanchez

Substitutes

Coach: Anders Jacobson

Substitutes

Coach: Nathan Thackeray

Chicago Red Stars WPosition StrengthNorth Carolina Courage W
6.58
Avg Rating
7.10
6.74Goalkeeper (1 v 1)
0G 0A0G 0A
6.72Defender (2 v 2)7.09
0G 0A0G 3A
6.54Midfielder (7 v 6)7.04
1G 0A2G 2A
Forward (1 v 2)7.35
0G 0A5G 0A
Chicago Red Stars W4-2-3-1
1GoalkeeperA. Naeher6.7
6DefenderK. Hendrich6.7
32DefenderT. Malham
30MidfielderC. Biegalski
3MidfielderS. Staab6.7
8MidfielderJ. Joseph6.2
13MidfielderL. Nesbeth6.6
20MidfielderB. Franklin6.3
77MidfielderM. Lopez Millan6.8
26MidfielderN. Gomes6.81G
34ForwardA. Schlegel
North Carolina Courage W3-4-3
1GoalkeeperC. Murphy
13DefenderR. Williams7.13A
3DefenderK. Kurtz
27MidfielderM. Bell7.1
77MidfielderAline Gomes
16MidfielderR. Jackson6.9
20MidfielderS. Koyama6.81A
14MidfielderT. Lussi
34MidfielderM. Matsukubo7.32G1A
8ForwardB. A. Pinto
2ForwardA. Sanchez7.35G

Match Summary

Chicago Red Stars W and North Carolina Courage W drew 3:3. The match was played in NWSL Women 2025. Goals were scored by M. Matsukubo 49′, T. Lussi 62′, Ludmila 76′, Ludmila 81′, J. Shaw 83′, Ludmila 86′. 4 yellow cards were shown. Chicago Red Stars W had 36% possession while North Carolina Courage W held 64%. Chicago Red Stars W had 10 shots (6 on target) compared to 12 (6 on target) for North Carolina Courage W. Chicago Red Stars W made 5 substitutions, North Carolina Courage W made 3.

Rivalry since 2019

Chicago Red Stars W vs North Carolina Courage W Head to Head Results

15 stretnutí
Chicago Red Stars W
3
wins
Drawn
3
North Carolina Courage W
9
wins
Total goals
45 · 3.0/match
Both scored
7/15 · 47%
Over 2.5
9/15 · 60%

Recent Form

Chicago Red Stars W

LLLWLL

North Carolina Courage W

LLDWDL
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026