Menu

Waterford vs Shamrock Rovers

Regional Sports Centre, Waterford16 May 2025 at 19:45
Referee: A. O'Dowd

Match Events

Waterford
Shamrock Rovers
Kick Off
P. Amond

assist: R. Burke

10′
25′
R. Gaffney

assist: A. Greene

Half Time
K. RadkowskiN. Bakboord
60′
D. McMenamyR. McDonald
60′
69′
G. O'NeillM. Healy
69′
D. NugentJ. O'Sullivan
69′
R. GaffneyM. Noonan
75′
J. ByrneG. Burke
88′
A. GreeneC. Barrett
J. OlayinkaM. Pouwels
90+3′
90′
G. Burke

assist: J. Honohan

Full Time

Match Statistics

1Shots on Goal5
0Shots off Goal7
9Total Shots13
8Blocked Shots1
6Shots insidebox9
3Shots outsidebox4
10Fouls9
3Corner Kicks2
4Offsides1
57%Ball Possession43%
2Yellow Cards1
0Red Cards0
2Goalkeeper Saves0
504Total passes393
389Passes accurate290
77%Passes %74%
0expected_goals0
0goals_prevented0

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Waterford is 6.90, compared to 6.95 for Shamrock Rovers. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Waterford's highest-rated starter is S. McMullan (7.68), while Shamrock Rovers's best-rated player is J. Byrne (7.26).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Waterford have contributed 8 goals and 2 assists this season, led by T. Lonergan (4G). Shamrock Rovers's starters account for 6 goals and 5 assists, spearheaded by R. Lopes (3G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

Waterford deploy 4 defenders rated — on average, against Shamrock Rovers's 5-man backline averaging 6.91. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

Waterford field 4 midfielders averaging 6.72, versus Shamrock Rovers's 3 rated 7.26. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

Waterford start 2 forward(s) averaging 6.70, compared to 2 for Shamrock Rovers averaging 6.65. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 62% for Waterford and 80% for Shamrock Rovers. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Waterford's starters have collected 9 yellow cards this season, compared to 11 for Shamrock Rovers. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Waterford's starting XI is 24.4 (youngest: S. Glenfield (20), oldest: P. Amond (37)), while Shamrock Rovers average 29.7 (youngest: C. O'Sullivan (19), oldest: A. Greene (35)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Waterford's starters average 12 league appearances each, versus 12 for Shamrock Rovers. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Waterford4-3-1-25-3-2Shamrock Rovers
GKDEFMIDFWD
1McMullan5Horton17Radkows.15Leahy3Burke19Glenfie.8Olayinka16White27McMenamy18Lonergan9Amond1McGinty3Matthews5Grace4Lopes27O'Sulli.2Honohan29Byrne15Nugent16O'Neill20Gaffney9Greene

Substitutes

Coach: John Coleman

Substitutes

Coach: Stephen Bradley

WaterfordPosition StrengthShamrock Rovers
6.90
Avg Rating
6.95
7.68Goalkeeper (1 v 1)7.11
0G 0A0G 0A
Defender (4 v 5)6.91
0G 0A3G 2A
6.72Midfielder (4 v 3)7.26
1G 1A1G 3A
6.70Forward (2 v 2)6.65
7G 1A2G 0A
Waterford4-3-1-2
1GoalkeeperS. McMullan7.7
5DefenderG. Horton
17DefenderK. Radkowski
15DefenderD. Leahy
3DefenderR. Burke
19MidfielderS. Glenfield6.6
8MidfielderJ. Olayinka
16MidfielderK. White
27MidfielderD. McMenamy6.91G1A
18ForwardT. Lonergan7.04G1A
9ForwardP. Amond6.43G
Shamrock Rovers5-3-2
1GoalkeeperE. McGinty7.1
3DefenderA. Matthews6.4
5DefenderL. Grace7.1
4DefenderR. Lopes7.23G
27DefenderC. O'Sullivan6.92A
2DefenderJ. Honohan
29MidfielderJ. Byrne7.31G3A
15MidfielderD. Nugent
16MidfielderG. O'Neill
20ForwardR. Gaffney
9ForwardA. Greene6.72G

Match Summary

Shamrock Rovers defeated Waterford 3:1. The match was played in Premier Division 2025. Goals were scored by P. Amond 10′, R. Gaffney 25′, M. Noonan 76′, G. Burke 90′. 3 yellow cards were shown. Waterford had 57% possession while Shamrock Rovers held 43%. Waterford had 9 shots (1 on target) compared to 13 (5 on target) for Shamrock Rovers. Waterford made 3 substitutions, Shamrock Rovers made 5.

Rivalry since 2019

Waterford vs Shamrock Rovers Head to Head Results

20 stretnutí
Waterford
2
wins
Drawn
1
Shamrock Rovers
17
wins
Total goals
62 · 3.1/match
Both scored
13/20 · 65%
Over 2.5
13/20 · 65%

Recent Form

Waterford

LDLDLD

Shamrock Rovers

WWWLWW
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026