17 August 2014 at 16:30

FM

FC Mariupol

14
Full Time

Match Summary

Dynamo Kyiv defeated FC Mariupol 4:1. The match was played in Premier League 2014. Goals were scored by A. Kravets 6′, O. Husyev 54′, A. Kravets 58′, S. Yavorskiy 65′, A. Kravets 87′. FC Mariupol made 3 substitutions, Dynamo Kyiv made 3.

Match Events

Key match events between FC Mariupol and Dynamo Kyiv — 5 goals and 0 cards recorded during the match.

FC Mariupol
Dynamo Kyiv
Kick Off
6′
A. Kravets
Half Time
54′
O. Husyev

assist: D. Garmash

V. ChurkoA. Oberemko
57′
58′
A. Kravets

assist: E. Makarenko

D. MyshnovS. Yavorskiy
59′
64′
O. HusyevJ. Lens
S. Yavorskiy

assist: D. Targamadze

65′
75′
D. GarmashR. Bezus
V. FedotovI. Kalinin
83′
83′
Y. BelhandaS. Sydorchuk
87′
A. Kravets
Full Time

Lineups

FC Mariupol lined up in a — formation, while Dynamo Kyiv deployed a —.

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for FC Mariupol is —, compared to 7.10 for Dynamo Kyiv. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. FC Mariupol's highest-rated starter is —, while Dynamo Kyiv's best-rated player is A. Yarmolenko (7.10).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of FC Mariupol have contributed 0 goals and 0 assists this season, led by —. Dynamo Kyiv's starters account for 3 goals and 0 assists, spearheaded by A. Yarmolenko (3G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Midfield Control

FC Mariupol field 11 midfielders averaging —, versus Dynamo Kyiv's 11 rated 7.10. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages —% for FC Mariupol and 73% for Dynamo Kyiv. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

FC Mariupol's starters have collected 0 yellow cards this season, compared to 1 for Dynamo Kyiv. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of FC Mariupol's starting XI is — (youngest: —, oldest: —), while Dynamo Kyiv average 36.0 (youngest: A. Yarmolenko (36), oldest: A. Yarmolenko (36)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

FC Mariupol's starters average 0 league appearances each, versus 16 for Dynamo Kyiv. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

FC MariupolPosition StrengthDynamo Kyiv
Avg Rating
7.10
Midfielder (11 v 11)7.10
0G 0A3G 0A
FC Mariupol
1MidfielderY. Galchuk
32MidfielderN. Ishchenko
3MidfielderO. Chizhov
99MidfielderD. Targamadze
4MidfielderO. Dovgiy
77MidfielderA. Putivtsev
17MidfielderV. Fedotov
20MidfielderV. Churko
61MidfielderD. Myshnov
11MidfielderS. Gryn
8MidfielderA. Totovytsky
Dynamo Kyiv
1MidfielderO. Shovkovsky
28MidfielderB. Trémoulinas
6MidfielderA. Dragovic
2MidfielderDanilo Silva
27MidfielderE. Makarenko
20MidfielderO. Husyev
90MidfielderY. Belhanda
17MidfielderS. Rybalka
19MidfielderD. Garmash
22MidfielderA. Kravets
10MidfielderA. Yarmolenko7.13G

Recent Form

In their last 0 matches, FC Mariupol have recorded 0 wins, 0 draws and 0 defeats. Dynamo Kyiv show 4 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses from their last 6 outings.

FC Mariupol

Dynamo Kyiv

WLLWWW
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 31 Mar 2026