30 November 2014 at 15:00

M

Metalist

42
Full Time

Match Summary

Metalist defeated Zorya Luhansk 4:2. The match was played in Premier League 2014. Goals were scored by A. Pilyavskiy 37′, Jajá 40′ (pen.), Jajá 49′, S. Bolbat 67′, I. Petryak 84′, Jajá 90′. Metalist made 2 substitutions, Zorya Luhansk made 3.

Match Events

Key match events between Metalist and Zorya Luhansk — 6 goals and 0 cards recorded during the match.

Metalist
Zorya Luhansk
Kick Off
37′
A. Pilyavskiy

assist: R. Malinovskiy

Jajá

Penalty

40′
Half Time
46′
G. YarmashN. Ignjatijević
Jajá

assist: P. Rebenok

49′
P. RebenokS. Bolbat
60′
64′
R. MalinovskiyZ. Ljubenovic
64′
O. KaravaevI. Petryak
S. Bolbat

assist: Jajá

67′
V. GomenyukJuan Torres
69′
84′
I. Petryak
Jajá

assist: P. Gueye

90+2′
Full Time

Lineups

Metalist lined up in a — formation, while Zorya Luhansk deployed a —.

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Metalist is —, compared to 7.06 for Zorya Luhansk. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Metalist's highest-rated starter is —, while Zorya Luhansk's best-rated player is P. Budkivskiy (7.06).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Metalist have contributed 0 goals and 0 assists this season, led by —. Zorya Luhansk's starters account for 3 goals and 0 assists, spearheaded by P. Budkivskiy (3G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Midfield Control

Metalist field 11 midfielders averaging —, versus Zorya Luhansk's 11 rated 7.06. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages —% for Metalist and 76% for Zorya Luhansk. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Metalist's starters have collected 0 yellow cards this season, compared to 4 for Zorya Luhansk. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Metalist's starting XI is — (youngest: —, oldest: —), while Zorya Luhansk average 33.0 (youngest: P. Budkivskiy (33), oldest: P. Budkivskiy (33)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Metalist's starters average 0 league appearances each, versus 21 for Zorya Luhansk. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

MetalistPosition StrengthZorya Luhansk
Avg Rating
7.06
Midfielder (11 v 11)7.06
0G 0A3G 0A
Metalist
81MidfielderV. Dišljenković
6MidfielderM. Torsiglieri
3MidfielderC. Villagra
77MidfielderV. Kobin
30MidfielderP. Gueye
17MidfielderS. Pshenichnikh
8MidfielderEdmar
82MidfielderP. Rebenok
32MidfielderO. Krasnoperov
50MidfielderJajá
14MidfielderV. Gomenyuk
Zorya Luhansk
30MidfielderM. Shevchenko
15MidfielderV. Vernydub
16MidfielderG. Yarmash
35MidfielderO. Grytsay
6MidfielderN. Kamenyuka
99MidfielderA. Pilyavskiy
37MidfielderD. Khomchenovskiy
9MidfielderP. Segbefia
18MidfielderR. Malinovskiy
20MidfielderO. Karavaev
28MidfielderP. Budkivskiy7.13G

Recent Form

In their last 0 matches, Metalist have recorded 0 wins, 0 draws and 0 defeats. Zorya Luhansk show 2 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses from their last 6 outings.

Metalist

Zorya Luhansk

LWDDWL
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 31 Mar 2026