14 May 2016 at 16:30

M

Metalist

14
Full Time

Match Summary

Dynamo Kyiv defeated Metalist 4:1. The match was played in Premier League 2015. Goals were scored by Ł. Teodorczyk 7′, Ł. Teodorczyk 8′, Ł. Teodorczyk 67′, S. Napolov 90′, O. Husyev 90′. Metalist made 3 substitutions, Dynamo Kyiv made 3.

Match Events

Key match events between Metalist and Dynamo Kyiv — 5 goals and 0 cards recorded during the match.

Metalist
Dynamo Kyiv
Kick Off
7′
Ł. Teodorczyk

assist: V. Buyalskyy

8′
Ł. Teodorczyk

assist: O. Iakovenko

O. KaplienkoS. Napolov
34′
Half Time
S. BarilkoI. Rodić
46′
67′
Ł. Teodorczyk

assist: N. Korzun

74′
Ł. TeodorczykJúnior Moraes
74′
S. SydorchukD. Garmash
85′
O. IakovenkoO. Husyev
I. KharatinO. Synytsia
89′
S. Napolov

assist: O. Synytsia

90+2′
90+4′
O. Husyev

assist: D. Garmash

Full Time

Lineups

Metalist lined up in a — formation, while Dynamo Kyiv deployed a —.

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Metalist is —, compared to 7.31 for Dynamo Kyiv. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Metalist's highest-rated starter is —, while Dynamo Kyiv's best-rated player is V. Buyalskyy (7.31).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Metalist have contributed 0 goals and 0 assists this season, led by —. Dynamo Kyiv's starters account for 1 goals and 1 assists, spearheaded by V. Buyalskyy (1G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Midfield Control

Metalist field 11 midfielders averaging —, versus Dynamo Kyiv's 11 rated 7.31. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages —% for Metalist and 78% for Dynamo Kyiv. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Metalist's starters have collected 0 yellow cards this season, compared to 1 for Dynamo Kyiv. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Metalist's starting XI is — (youngest: —, oldest: —), while Dynamo Kyiv average 32.0 (youngest: V. Buyalskyy (32), oldest: V. Buyalskyy (32)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Metalist's starters average 0 league appearances each, versus 19 for Dynamo Kyiv. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

MetalistPosition StrengthDynamo Kyiv
Avg Rating
7.31
Midfielder (11 v 11)7.31
0G 0A1G 1A
Metalist
23MidfielderS. Pogorelyj
15MidfielderD. Ryzhuk
42MidfielderE. Zubeyko
95MidfielderE. Sobol
20MidfielderO. Kaplienko
13MidfielderI. Zotko
80MidfielderV. Priyomov
8MidfielderS. Barilko
21MidfielderI. Kharatin
54MidfielderV. Kraev
49MidfielderA. Ralyuchenko
Dynamo Kyiv
72MidfielderA. Rudko
34MidfielderY. Khacheridi
27MidfielderE. Makarenko
7MidfielderO. Iakovenko
8MidfielderR. Petrović
9MidfielderM. Morozyuk
16MidfielderS. Sydorchuk
29MidfielderV. Buyalskyy7.31G1A
88MidfielderS. Myakushko
18MidfielderN. Korzun
91MidfielderŁ. Teodorczyk

Recent Form

In their last 0 matches, Metalist have recorded 0 wins, 0 draws and 0 defeats. Dynamo Kyiv show 4 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses from their last 6 outings.

Metalist

Dynamo Kyiv

WLLWWW
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 31 Mar 2026