26 April 2017 at 16:30

01
Full Time
Referee: Evgeni Andreyevich Turbin

Match Summary

Akhmat Grozny defeated Rubin 1:0. The match was played in Premier League 2016. Goals were scored by A. Mbengue 44′. 7 yellow cards were shown. Rubin had 64% possession while Akhmat Grozny held 36%. Rubin had 10 shots (1 on target) compared to 11 (5 on target) for Akhmat Grozny. Rubin made 3 substitutions, Akhmat Grozny made 3.

Match Events

Key match events between Rubin and Akhmat Grozny — 1 goals and 7 cards recorded during the match.

Rubin
Akhmat Grozny
Kick Off
24′Zaurbek Pliev
A. SongY. M'Vila
38′
Half Time
M. LestienneRubén Rochina
68′
69′
M. MitrishevG. Torje
R. ZhemaletdinovD. Tkachuk
78′
79′
A. MbengueB. Balaj
82′
I. LebedenkoO. Ivanov
Sergio Sánchez83′
83′Rodolfo
Full Time

Match Statistics

Rubin had 64% possession against Akhmat Grozny's 36%. Rubin registered 10 shots (1 on target) while Akhmat Grozny managed 11 (5 on target). Corner kicks: 9–3. Fouls committed: 10–18.

1Shots on Goal5
8Shots off Goal5
10Total Shots11
1Blocked Shots1
7Shots insidebox6
3Shots outsidebox5
10Fouls18
9Corner Kicks3
2Offsides2
64%Ball Possession36%
4Yellow Cards3
0Red Cards0
4Goalkeeper Saves1
494Total passes276
400Passes accurate195
81%Passes %71%

Lineups

Rubin lined up in a 4-4-2 formation under Javi Gracia, while Akhmat Grozny deployed a 5-3-2 under R. Rakhimov.

Defensive Solidity

Rubin deploy 4 defenders rated — on average, against Akhmat Grozny's 5-man backline averaging —. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

Rubin field 4 midfielders averaging —, versus Akhmat Grozny's 2 rated —. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

Rubin start 3 forward(s) averaging —, compared to 3 for Akhmat Grozny averaging —. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Rubin4-4-25-3-2Akhmat Grozny
GKDEFMIDFWD
1Ryzhikov2Kuzmin6Sánchez25Zambrano8Song10Lestien.3Nabiull.20Caktaš22Jonathas9Kanunni.96Zhemale.16Gorodov2Rodolfo15Semenov5Pliev4Ángel13Mohamma.23Píriz14Kuzyaev55Lebeden.95Mitrish.17Mbengue

Substitutes

Coach: Javi Gracia

Substitutes

Coach: R. Rakhimov

RubinPosition StrengthAkhmat Grozny
Rubin4-4-2
2DefenderO. Kuzmin
6DefenderSergio Sánchez
25DefenderC. Zambrano
3DefenderE. Nabiullin
1MidfielderS. Ryzhikov
8MidfielderA. Song
10MidfielderM. Lestienne
20MidfielderM. Caktaš
22ForwardJonathas
9ForwardM. Kanunnikov
96ForwardR. Zhemaletdinov
Akhmat Grozny5-3-2
16GoalkeeperE. Gorodov
2DefenderRodolfo
15DefenderA. Semenov
5DefenderZ. Pliev
4DefenderW. Ángel
13DefenderMilad Mohammadi
23MidfielderF. Píriz
14MidfielderD. Kuzyaev
55ForwardI. Lebedenko
95ForwardM. Mitrishev
17ForwardA. Mbengue

Recent Form

In their last 6 matches, Rubin have recorded 3 wins, 3 draws and 0 defeats. Akhmat Grozny show 1 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses from their last 6 outings.

Rubin

DDWDWW

Akhmat Grozny

LDLWDD

Rubin vs Akhmat Grozny Head to Head Results

Rubin and Akhmat Grozny have met 4 times — Rubin won 2, Akhmat Grozny won 1, with 1 draws. Their rivalry dates back to 2025. Rubin leads the head-to-head with 2 victories from 4 meetings. A combined 11 goals have been scored across these fixtures, averaging 2.75 per match (6 for the home side, 5 for the visitors). Both teams scored in 1 matches (25%). Over 2.5 goals landed in 1 games (25%), making it a fixture that tends to produce goals. The highest-scoring encounter finished 3–3 in 2025.

2

Rubin

1

Drawn

1

Akhmat Grozny

Goals: 6Goals: 5

Recent Meetings (4)

22 Nov 2025Rubin1 – 0Akhmat
22 Oct 2025Rubin3 – 3Akhmat
26 Aug 2025Akhmat2 – 0Rubin
20 Jul 2025Akhmat0 – 2Rubin
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 28 Mar 2026