Match Summary
FC Rostov and Rubin drew 1:1. The match was played in Premier League 2024. Goals were scored by D. Glebov 14′, M. Daku 62′ (pen.). 4 yellow cards were shown. FC Rostov had 61% possession while Rubin held 39%. FC Rostov had 16 shots (4 on target) compared to 11 (5 on target) for Rubin. FC Rostov made 4 substitutions, Rubin made 5.
Match Events
Key match events between FC Rostov and Rubin — 2 goals and 4 cards recorded during the match.
assist: Ronaldo
Penalty
Match Statistics
FC Rostov had 61% possession against Rubin's 39%. FC Rostov registered 16 shots (4 on target) while Rubin managed 11 (5 on target). Corner kicks: 7–2. Fouls committed: 13–16.
Lineups
FC Rostov lined up in a 4-3-3 formation under V. Karpin, while Rubin deployed a 5-4-1 under R. Rakhimov.
Squad Ratings
The overall squad rating for FC Rostov is 6.78, compared to 6.72 for Rubin. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. FC Rostov's highest-rated starter is K. Shchetinin (6.94), while Rubin's best-rated player is D. Kabutov (7.03).
Attacking Output
The starting XI of FC Rostov have contributed 2 goals and 2 assists this season, led by I. Vakhania (1G). Rubin's starters account for 10 goals and 4 assists, spearheaded by M. Daku (9G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.
Defensive Solidity
FC Rostov deploy 4 defenders rated 6.76 on average, against Rubin's 5-man backline averaging 6.78. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.
Midfield Control
FC Rostov field 3 midfielders averaging 6.94, versus Rubin's 4 rated 6.56. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.
Forward Threat
FC Rostov start 3 forward(s) averaging —, compared to 1 for Rubin averaging 6.82. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.
Discipline
FC Rostov's starters have collected 11 yellow cards this season, compared to 23 for Rubin. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.
Age & Experience
The average age of FC Rostov's starting XI is 23.8 (youngest: I. Aznaurov (21), oldest: R. Yatimov (27)), while Rubin average 26.7 (youngest: I. Rozhkov (20), oldest: D. Kabutov (33)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.
Squad Depth
FC Rostov's starters average 11 league appearances each, versus 14 for Rubin. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.
Substitutes
Substitutes
Recent Form
In their last 6 matches, FC Rostov have recorded 2 wins, 1 draws and 3 defeats. Rubin show 1 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses from their last 6 outings.
FC Rostov
Rubin
Head to Head
FC Rostov and Rubin have met 2 times — FC Rostov won 1, Rubin won 1, with 0 draws. Their rivalry dates back to 2025. A combined 3 goals have been scored across these fixtures, averaging 1.50 per match (2 for the home side, 1 for the visitors). Both teams scored in 0 matches (0%). Over 2.5 goals landed in 0 games (0%), making it a fixture that tends to produce goals. The highest-scoring encounter finished 2–0 in 2025.
1
FC Rostov
0
Drawn
1
Rubin
Recent Meetings (2)
API data: 15 Mar 2026