21 March 2026 at 13:30

12
Full Time

Match Summary

LNZ Cherkasy defeated Ruh Lviv 2:1. The match was played in Premier League 2025. Goals were scored by V. Roman 45′, G. Pasich 63′, D. Kravchuk 81′. 5 yellow cards were shown. Ruh Lviv made 4 substitutions, LNZ Cherkasy made 5.

Match Events

Key match events between Ruh Lviv and LNZ Cherkasy — 3 goals and 5 cards recorded during the match.

Ruh Lviv
LNZ Cherkasy
Kick Off
6′
Awudu AbdulY. Tverdokhlib
Tutti22′
V. Roman

assist: S. Diallo

45′
Half Time
46′
V. TankovskiyS. Nonikashvili
58′
Y. PastukhG. Pasich
58′
A. MykytyshynD. Kravchuk
63′
G. Pasich

assist: Y. Tverdokhlib

TuttiI. Neves
68′
S. DialloV. Runich
69′
73′
I. PutryaJ. Bennette
81′
D. Kravchuk

assist: O. Gorin

Talles BrenerV. Raileanu
82′
KlayverK. Kvas
88′
Full Time

Lineups

Ruh Lviv lined up in a 4-1-4-1 formation under Ivan Fedyk, while LNZ Cherkasy deployed a 4-3-3 under Vitaliy Ponomaryov.

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Ruh Lviv is 6.71, compared to 6.95 for LNZ Cherkasy. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Ruh Lviv's highest-rated starter is Vitalii Roman (7.24), while LNZ Cherkasy's best-rated player is Denys Kuzyk (7.33).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Ruh Lviv have contributed 5 goals and 3 assists this season, led by Vitalii Roman (3G). LNZ Cherkasy's starters account for 5 goals and 7 assists, spearheaded by Denys Kuzyk (2G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

Ruh Lviv deploy 2 defenders rated 6.88 on average, against LNZ Cherkasy's 4-man backline averaging 7.09. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

Ruh Lviv field 7 midfielders averaging 6.65, versus LNZ Cherkasy's 6 rated 6.83. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

Ruh Lviv start 1 forward(s) averaging 6.55, compared to 0 for LNZ Cherkasy averaging —. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 76% for Ruh Lviv and 75% for LNZ Cherkasy. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Ruh Lviv's starters have collected 27 yellow cards this season, compared to 18 for LNZ Cherkasy. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Ruh Lviv's starting XI is 22.3 (youngest: Maksym Boiko (20), oldest: Talles Brener (27)), while LNZ Cherkasy average 25.3 (youngest: Yevhenii Pastukh (21), oldest: Oleksiy Palamarchuk (34)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Ruh Lviv's starters average 14 league appearances each, versus 15 for LNZ Cherkasy. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Ruh Lviv4-1-4-14-3-3LNZ Cherkasy
GKDEFMIDFWD
1Gereta75Kitela76Tovarny.15Pidgurs.93Roman56Boiko14Diallo10Prytula30Brener7Klayver21Tutti12Palamar.33Putria25Horin29Didyk14Drambaev6Tankovs.16Ryabov19Pastukh7Mykytys.18Awudu17Kuzyk

Substitutes

Coach: Ivan Fedyk

Substitutes

Coach: Vitaliy Ponomaryov

Ruh LvivPosition StrengthLNZ Cherkasy
6.71
Avg Rating
6.95
7.00Goalkeeper (1 v 1)7.09
0G 0A0G 0A
6.88Defender (2 v 4)7.09
3G 1A1G 1A
6.65Midfielder (7 v 6)6.83
2G 2A4G 6A
6.55Forward (1 v 0)
0G 0A
Ruh Lviv4-1-4-1
1GoalkeeperYuriy-Volodymyr Gereta7.0
76DefenderOleksiy Tovarnytskyi6.5
93DefenderVitalii Roman7.23G1A
75MidfielderAndriy Kitela6.61A
15MidfielderDenys Pidgurskyi6.7
56MidfielderMaksym Boiko6.6
14MidfielderSamba Diallo6.61A
10MidfielderOstap Prytula6.81G
30MidfielderTalles Brener6.7
7MidfielderKlayver6.51G
21ForwardTutti6.5
LNZ Cherkasy4-3-3
12GoalkeeperOleksiy Palamarchuk7.1
33DefenderIllia Putria7.21G
25DefenderOleg Horin7.31A
29DefenderRoman Didyk6.9
14DefenderOleksandr Drambaev6.9
6MidfielderViacheslav Tankovskyi6.91A
16MidfielderArtur Ryabov7.01G
19MidfielderYevhenii Pastukh6.51G2A
7MidfielderArtur Mykytyshyn6.7
18MidfielderAbdul Awudu6.6
17MidfielderDenys Kuzyk7.32G3A

Recent Form

In their last 6 matches, Ruh Lviv have recorded 0 wins, 1 draws and 5 defeats. LNZ Cherkasy show 4 wins, 1 draws and 1 losses from their last 6 outings.

Ruh Lviv

LDLLLL

LNZ Cherkasy

LDWWWW

Ruh Lviv vs LNZ Cherkasy Head to Head Results

Ruh Lviv and LNZ Cherkasy have met 2 times — Ruh Lviv won 0, LNZ Cherkasy won 2, with 0 draws. Their rivalry dates back to 2025. LNZ Cherkasy leads the head-to-head with 2 victories from 2 meetings. A combined 2 goals have been scored across these fixtures, averaging 1.00 per match (0 for the home side, 2 for the visitors). Both teams scored in 0 matches (0%). Over 2.5 goals landed in 0 games (0%), making it a fixture that tends to produce goals. The highest-scoring encounter finished 1–0 in 2025.

0

Ruh Lviv

0

Drawn

2

LNZ Cherkasy

Goals: 0Goals: 2

Recent Meetings (2)

29 Oct 2025LNZ Cherkasy1 – 0Ruh Lviv
21 Sept 2025LNZ Cherkasy1 – 0Ruh Lviv
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 22 Mar 2026