Menu

Dynamo Kyiv vs Hoverla

NSK Olimpijs'kyj, Kiev4 May 2015 at 15:00
60
Away

Hoverla

Match Events

Dynamo Kyiv
Hoverla
Kick Off
A. Kravets

assist: J. Lens

12′
I. Glushytskiy

Own Goal

20′
A. Kravets

assist: J. Lens

28′
A. Yarmolenko

Penalty

30′
S. Sydorchuk

assist: A. Kravets

41′
Half Time
S. SydorchukMiguel Veloso
46′
46′
O. PolyanskyM. Raičević
46′
V. AkimovD. Trukhin
A. YarmolenkoO. Husyev
62′
A. KravetsŁ. Teodorczyk
62′
Ł. Teodorczyk

assist: O. Husyev

73′
85′
I. RodićY. Toma
Full Time

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Dynamo Kyiv is 7.03, compared to — for Hoverla. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Dynamo Kyiv's highest-rated starter is A. Yarmolenko (7.03), while Hoverla's best-rated player is —.

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Dynamo Kyiv have contributed 3 goals and 0 assists this season, led by A. Yarmolenko (3G). Hoverla's starters account for 0 goals and 0 assists, spearheaded by —. Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Midfield Control

Dynamo Kyiv field 11 midfielders averaging 7.03, versus Hoverla's 11 rated —. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 72% for Dynamo Kyiv and —% for Hoverla. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Dynamo Kyiv's starters have collected 1 yellow cards this season, compared to 0 for Hoverla. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Dynamo Kyiv's starting XI is 36.0 (youngest: A. Yarmolenko (36), oldest: A. Yarmolenko (36)), while Hoverla average — (youngest: —, oldest: —). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Dynamo Kyiv's starters average 18 league appearances each, versus 0 for Hoverla. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Dynamo KyivPosition StrengthHoverla
7.03
Avg Rating
7.03Midfielder (11 v 11)
3G 0A0G 0A
Dynamo Kyiv
1MidfielderO. Shovkovsky
5MidfielderAntunes
6MidfielderA. Dragovic
2MidfielderDanilo Silva
34MidfielderY. Khacheridi
16MidfielderS. Sydorchuk
90MidfielderY. Belhanda
17MidfielderS. Rybalka
7MidfielderJ. Lens
22MidfielderA. Kravets
10MidfielderA. Yarmolenko7.03G
Hoverla
22MidfielderD. Babenko
5MidfielderS. Akakpo
6MidfielderA. Tudose
14MidfielderT. Kacharaba
29MidfielderI. Glushytskiy
44MidfielderL. Šimić
2MidfielderO. Polyansky
88MidfielderV. Akimov
10MidfielderM. Feshchuk
28MidfielderI. Rodić
77MidfielderV. Gryshyn

Match Summary

Dynamo Kyiv defeated Hoverla 6:0. The match was played in Premier League 2014. Goals were scored by A. Kravets 12′, I. Glushytskiy 20′ (o.g.), A. Kravets 28′, A. Yarmolenko 30′ (pen.), S. Sydorchuk 41′, Ł. Teodorczyk 73′. Dynamo Kyiv made 3 substitutions, Hoverla made 3.

Rivalry since 2012

Dynamo Kyiv vs Hoverla Head to Head Results

7 stretnutí
Dynamo Kyiv
7
wins
Drawn
0
Hoverla
0
wins
Total goals
24 · 3.4/match
Both scored
3/7 · 43%
Over 2.5
5/7 · 71%

Recent Form

Dynamo Kyiv

LWWWLL

Hoverla

Match Prediction

Dynamo Kyiv

45%

Home win

 

45%

Draw

Hoverla

10%

Away win

Model advice

Winner : Dynamo Kyiv

58%Form42%
60%Attack40%
70%Defence30%
100%Head-to-head0%
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026