Menu

Zorya Luhansk vs Dynamo Kyiv

Slavutych-Arena, Zaporozh'ye30 August 2015 at 17:30

Match Events

Zorya Luhansk
Dynamo Kyiv
Kick Off
Half Time
65′
S. SydorchukD. Garmash
65′
D. GonzálezO. Husyev
D. GrechyshkinZ. Ljubenovic
69′
77′
Y. BelhandaV. Buyalskyy
R. MalinovskiyJ. Lipartia
82′
A. GordienkoV. Tankovskiy
85′
Full Time

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Zorya Luhansk is 7.10, compared to 7.03 for Dynamo Kyiv. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Zorya Luhansk's highest-rated starter is P. Budkivskiy (7.10), while Dynamo Kyiv's best-rated player is A. Yarmolenko (7.03).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Zorya Luhansk have contributed 4 goals and 0 assists this season, led by P. Budkivskiy (4G). Dynamo Kyiv's starters account for 3 goals and 0 assists, spearheaded by A. Yarmolenko (3G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Midfield Control

Zorya Luhansk field 11 midfielders averaging 7.10, versus Dynamo Kyiv's 11 rated 7.03. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 76% for Zorya Luhansk and 72% for Dynamo Kyiv. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Zorya Luhansk's starters have collected 4 yellow cards this season, compared to 1 for Dynamo Kyiv. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Zorya Luhansk's starting XI is 33.0 (youngest: P. Budkivskiy (33), oldest: P. Budkivskiy (33)), while Dynamo Kyiv average 36.0 (youngest: A. Yarmolenko (36), oldest: A. Yarmolenko (36)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Zorya Luhansk's starters average 24 league appearances each, versus 18 for Dynamo Kyiv. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Zorya LuhanskPosition StrengthDynamo Kyiv
7.10
Avg Rating
7.03
7.10Midfielder (11 v 11)7.03
4G 0A3G 0A
Zorya Luhansk
30MidfielderM. Shevchenko
5MidfielderA. Gordienko
6MidfielderN. Kamenyuka
3MidfielderM. Sivakov
24MidfielderD. Grechyshkin
99MidfielderA. Pilyavskiy
37MidfielderD. Khomchenovskiy
34MidfielderI. Petryak
18MidfielderR. Malinovskiy
20MidfielderO. Karavaev
28MidfielderP. Budkivskiy7.14G
Dynamo Kyiv
23MidfielderO. Rybka
5MidfielderAntunes
6MidfielderA. Dragovic
2MidfielderDanilo Silva
34MidfielderY. Khacheridi
16MidfielderS. Sydorchuk
90MidfielderY. Belhanda
17MidfielderS. Rybalka
11MidfielderJúnior Moraes
10MidfielderA. Yarmolenko7.03G
25MidfielderD. González

Match Summary

Zorya Luhansk and Dynamo Kyiv drew 0:0. The match was played in Premier League 2015. Zorya Luhansk made 3 substitutions, Dynamo Kyiv made 3.

Rivalry since 2011

Zorya Luhansk vs Dynamo Kyiv Head to Head Results

39 stretnutí
Zorya Luhansk
6
wins
Drawn
11
Dynamo Kyiv
22
wins
Total goals
120 · 3.1/match
Both scored
23/39 · 59%
Over 2.5
22/39 · 56%

Recent Meetings

Highest-scoring game: 44 v 2017

Recent Form

Zorya Luhansk

WWLLWD

Dynamo Kyiv

LWWWLL

Match Prediction

Zorya Luhansk

10%

Home win

 

45%

Draw

Dynamo Kyiv

45%

Away win

Model advice

Double chance : draw or Dynamo Kyiv

40%Form60%
52%Attack48%
50%Defence50%
15%Head-to-head85%
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026