Menu

Haras El Hodood vs El Mokawloon

Harras El Hodood Stadium, Alexandria13 May 2026 at 15:00

Match Events

Haras El Hodood
El Mokawloon
Kick Off
15′
N. HeshamJ. Ochaya
Penalty cancelled45+2′
VAR
Half Time
46′
I. GaberM. Adel
M. HamdiM. El Negely
61′
O. SaviolaA. Hafez
61′
69′
M. SalimA. Hawash
69′
S. NaguibA. Ouled Behi
I. Abou-SalimaM. El Deghemy
85′
I. CooperA. Nayel
85′
86′
KahrabaH. Hussein
Full Time

Match Statistics

0Shots on Goal0
9Shots off Goal9
15Total Shots10
6Blocked Shots1
10Shots insidebox4
5Shots outsidebox6
4Fouls7
4Corner Kicks1
1Offsides4
59%Ball Possession41%
2Yellow Cards3
0Red Cards1
0Goalkeeper Saves0
393Total passes280
272Passes accurate150
69%Passes %54%
0.48expected_goals0.64
0goals_prevented0

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Haras El Hodood is 6.69, compared to 6.78 for El Mokawloon. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Haras El Hodood's highest-rated starter is M. Ashraf (6.95), while El Mokawloon's best-rated player is O. El Wahsh (7.08).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Haras El Hodood have contributed 16 goals and 7 assists this season, led by M. Hamdi (6G). El Mokawloon's starters account for 17 goals and 9 assists, spearheaded by S. Naguib (6G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

Haras El Hodood deploy 4 defenders rated 6.63 on average, against El Mokawloon's 4-man backline averaging 6.73. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

Haras El Hodood field 4 midfielders averaging 6.83, versus El Mokawloon's 5 rated 6.79. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

Haras El Hodood start 2 forward(s) averaging 6.60, compared to 1 for El Mokawloon averaging 6.93. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 70% for Haras El Hodood and 65% for El Mokawloon. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Haras El Hodood's starters have collected 32 yellow cards this season, compared to 38 for El Mokawloon. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Haras El Hodood's starting XI is 28.2 (youngest: I. Abdelhakim (22), oldest: M. Hamdi (34)), while El Mokawloon average 29.2 (youngest: I. Abdellah (24), oldest: M. Aboul Saoud (38)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Haras El Hodood's starters average 21 league appearances each, versus 21 for El Mokawloon. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Haras El Hodood4-4-24-2-3-1El Mokawloon
GKDEFMIDFWD
13Shaaban24Awad5Abdelha.4Abou-Sa.10Henawy6Magli14Ashraf27Cooper74Okaa99Hamdi22Saviola1Saoud26Kahraba21Abdellah3Hamed24Hesham14Gamal12Wahsh25Ojera10Naguib20Gaber9Salim

Substitutes

Coach: Haitham Shaaban

Substitutes

Coach: Samy Elsoudany

Haras El HodoodPosition StrengthEl Mokawloon
6.69
Avg Rating
6.78
6.56Goalkeeper (1 v 1)6.78
0G 0A0G 0A
6.63Defender (4 v 4)6.73
5G 2A1G 5A
6.83Midfielder (4 v 5)6.79
5G 2A11G 2A
6.60Forward (2 v 1)6.93
6G 3A5G 2A
Haras El Hodood4-4-2
13GoalkeeperA. Shaaban6.6
24DefenderM. Awad6.71G2A
5DefenderI. Abdelhakim6.83G
4DefenderI. Abou-Salima6.71G
10DefenderF. El Henawy6.4
6MidfielderM. Magli6.8
14MidfielderM. Ashraf7.03G1A
27MidfielderI. Cooper6.91A
74MidfielderMahmoud Sayed Okaa6.72G
99ForwardM. Hamdi6.76G2A
22ForwardO. Saviola6.51A
El Mokawloon4-2-3-1
1GoalkeeperM. Aboul Saoud6.8
26DefenderKahraba6.74A
21DefenderI. Abdellah6.7
3DefenderM. Hamed6.91G
24DefenderN. Hesham6.71A
14MidfielderM. Gamal6.91G1A
12MidfielderO. El Wahsh7.1
25MidfielderJ. Ojera6.54G
10MidfielderS. Naguib6.86G1A
20MidfielderI. Gaber6.7
9ForwardM. Salim6.95G2A

Match Summary

Haras El Hodood and El Mokawloon drew 0:0. The match was played in Premier League 2025. 5 yellow cards were shown, 1 red card. Haras El Hodood had 59% possession while El Mokawloon held 41%. Haras El Hodood had 15 shots (0 on target) compared to 10 (0 on target) for El Mokawloon. Expected goals: Haras El Hodood 0.48 — El Mokawloon 0.64. Haras El Hodood made 4 substitutions, El Mokawloon made 5. VAR was involved: Penalty cancelled (Mohamed Hamdy Zaki 45′).

Rivalry since 2018

Haras El Hodood vs El Mokawloon Head to Head Results

5 stretnutí
Haras El Hodood
0
wins
Drawn
2
El Mokawloon
3
wins
Total goals
8 · 1.6/match
Both scored
1/5 · 20%
Over 2.5
1/5 · 20%

Recent Form

Haras El Hodood

DLDDLD

El Mokawloon

DWDDDW

Match Prediction

Haras El Hodood

10%

Home win

 

45%

Draw

El Mokawloon

45%

Away win

Model advice

Combo Double chance : draw or El Mokawloon and -3.5 goals

25%Form75%
44%Attack56%
25%Defence75%
15%Head-to-head85%

Bookmaker Odds

12 bookmakers

Best price

Haras El Hodood

3.46

Pinnacle

Draw

2.90

Bet365

El Mokawloon

2.52

Pinnacle

Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 17 May 2026