Betting Odds & Historical Data
Opening pre-match odds recorded for this fixture at the time it was played. These are historical figures for analytical reference only and do not reflect any current market.
Historical data only — not for betting
This data is sourced from football-data.co.uk and covers historical match results and pre-match odds. These figures do not represent current or live odds and cannot be used for placing bets. Betting is not possible on this website. Provided for analytical and research purposes only.
Head-to-Head Record
Even recordHistorical results between these two teams — showing who has dominated this fixture and whether the current odds reflect that pattern.
Goals in This Fixture
How many goals these two teams typically produce when they meet, based on their historical encounters.
3.2
Average goals per game
70%
Games with 3+ goals
80%
Both teams scored
Potential Betting Value Detected
Historical win rate (60%) differs significantly from the market-implied probability (40%) — the odds may underestimate Pisa.
Market Summary
Margin: 6.0%Implied win probabilities calculated from pre-match odds across multiple sources. A higher percentage means the market considered that outcome more likely. Compare these against your own assessment to spot potential value.
Implied Probability
Odds Range
| 1 | X | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Min | 2.25 | 3.00 | 3.20 |
| Max | 2.43 | 3.04 | 3.47 |
Market Consensus
Professional markets (sharp bookmakers) reflect sharp money and are harder to beat. Public markets are softer. When the two disagree significantly (highlighted in amber), it may indicate a mispriced line worth investigating.
| 1 | X | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Professional market | 40.0% | 32.0% | 28.0% |
| Public market | 40.9% | 30.7% | 28.3% |
| Δ | 0.9% | 1.3% | 0.3% |
Pisa vs Cremonese — margin-removed probabilities
Result vs. Market
Result matched market prediction
Match Statistics
Actual in-game statistics recorded for this match. Shots on target is a strong indicator of attacking pressure and correlates well with expected goals.
Head-to-Head History
Historical results between these two teams. Bold odds show which outcome was backed by the market — compare against the actual result to assess predictability of this fixture over time.
| Date | Home | Score | Away | Avg. odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13/05/2524/25 | Pisa | 2–1 | Cremonese | 2.67/3.38/2.63 |
| 03/11/2424/25 | Cremonese | 1–3 | Pisa | 2.13/3.37/3.39 |
| 01/05/2423/24 | Cremonese | 2–1 | Pisa | 1.77/3.71/4.45 |
| 02/12/2323/24 | Pisa | 0–0 | Cremonese | 3.36/3.38/2.15 |
| 13/03/2221/22 | Pisa | 3–0 | Cremonese | 2.35/3.01/3.31 |
| 28/10/2121/22 | Cremonese | 1–1 | Pisa | 2.16/3.25/3.47 |
| 06/02/2120/21 | Cremonese | 2–1 | Pisa | 2.25/3.14/3.49 |
| 04/10/2020/21 | Pisa | 1–1 | Cremonese | 2.38/2.98/3.37 |
| 31/01/2019/20 | Cremonese | 3–4 | Pisa | 1.82/3.16/5.20 |
| 15/09/1919/20 | Pisa | 4–1 | Cremonese | 2.84/3.04/2.66 |
Home Record / Away Record
Aggregated season statistics from all available historical data. Use these to assess each team's overall form, scoring frequency, and tendency for high-scoring matches.
Home Record: Pisa
Away Record: Cremonese
Data: football-data.co.uk
Match Summary
Pisa defeated Cremonese 3:0. The match was played in Serie B 2021. Goals were scored by E. Torregrossa 9′ (pen.), E. Torregrossa 50′, G. Puşcaş 89′. 7 yellow cards were shown. Pisa had 48% possession while Cremonese held 52%. Pisa had 16 shots (7 on target) compared to 13 (3 on target) for Cremonese. Pisa made 5 substitutions, Cremonese made 5. VAR was involved: Penalty awarded (Emanuele Valeri 40′).
Match Events
Key match events between Pisa and Cremonese — 3 goals and 7 cards recorded during the match.
Penalty
assist: P. Beruatto
assist: Á. Nagy
Match Statistics
Pisa had 48% possession against Cremonese's 52%. Pisa registered 16 shots (7 on target) while Cremonese managed 13 (3 on target). Corner kicks: 4–10. Fouls committed: 11–16.
Lineups
Pisa lined up in a 4-3-1-2 formation under L. D'Angelo, while Cremonese deployed a 4-2-3-1 under F. Pecchia.
Squad Ratings
The overall squad rating for Pisa is 6.64, compared to 6.80 for Cremonese. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Pisa's highest-rated starter is M. Marin (6.73), while Cremonese's best-rated player is L. Zanimacchia (6.80).
Attacking Output
The starting XI of Pisa have contributed 2 goals and 0 assists this season, led by A. Caracciolo (2G). Cremonese's starters account for 1 goals and 0 assists, spearheaded by L. Zanimacchia (1G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.
Defensive Solidity
Pisa deploy 4 defenders rated 6.68 on average, against Cremonese's 4-man backline averaging —. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.
Midfield Control
Pisa field 4 midfielders averaging 6.73, versus Cremonese's 5 rated 6.80. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.
Forward Threat
Pisa start 2 forward(s) averaging —, compared to 1 for Cremonese averaging —. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.
Passing & Build-Up
Passing accuracy averages 75% for Pisa and —% for Cremonese. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.
Discipline
Pisa's starters have collected 15 yellow cards this season, compared to 1 for Cremonese. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.
Age & Experience
The average age of Pisa's starting XI is 31.5 (youngest: P. Beruatto (27), oldest: Nícolas (37)), while Cremonese average 27.5 (youngest: L. Zanimacchia (27), oldest: L. Sernicola (28)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.
Squad Depth
Pisa's starters average 20 league appearances each, versus 1 for Cremonese. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.
Substitutes
Coach: L. D'Angelo
Substitutes
Coach: F. Pecchia
Recent Form
In their last 6 matches, Pisa have recorded 1 wins, 0 draws and 5 defeats. Cremonese show 1 wins, 1 draws and 4 losses from their last 6 outings.
Pisa
Cremonese
Pisa vs Cremonese Head to Head Results
Pisa and Cremonese have met 1 times — Pisa won 1, Cremonese won 0, with 0 draws. Their rivalry dates back to 2025. Pisa leads the head-to-head with 1 victories from 1 meetings. A combined 1 goals have been scored across these fixtures, averaging 1.00 per match (1 for the home side, 0 for the visitors). Both teams scored in 0 matches (0%). Over 2.5 goals landed in 0 games (0%), making it a fixture that tends to produce goals. The highest-scoring encounter finished 1–0 in 2025.
1
Pisa
0
Drawn
0
Cremonese
Recent Meetings (1)
API data: 25 Apr 2026