Menu

Pisa vs Parma

Full Time

Serie B · Season 2022

Arena Garibaldi - Stadio Romeo Anconetani, Pisa8 October 2022 at 13:00
Home

Pisa

00
Away

Parma

Referee: L. Pairetto

Match Events

Pisa
Parma
Kick Off
32′Stanko Jurić
Half Time
46′
S. SohmA. Benedyczak
56′
S. JurićC. Ansaldi
A. IoniţăM. Tramoni
60′
Pietro Beruatto68′
Marius Marin69′
70′
D. ManW. Coulibaly
G. SibilliO. Moruțan
71′
I. TouréTomás Esteves
71′
P. BeruattoG. Mastinu
86′
E. GliozziM. Cissé
86′
89′
R. IngleseG. Charpentier
Full Time

Match Statistics

2Shots on Goal7
6Shots off Goal7
10Total Shots19
2Blocked Shots5
5Shots insidebox12
5Shots outsidebox7
9Fouls5
6Corner Kicks5
3Offsides3
46%Ball Possession54%
2Yellow Cards1
0Red Cards0
7Goalkeeper Saves1
378Total passes445
283Passes accurate357
75%Passes %80%

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Pisa is 6.64, compared to 6.78 for Parma. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Pisa's highest-rated starter is I. Touré (6.78), while Parma's best-rated player is L. Valenti (6.88).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Pisa have contributed 2 goals and 0 assists this season, led by S. Canestrelli (1G). Parma's starters account for 2 goals and 0 assists, spearheaded by E. Del Prato (2G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

Pisa deploy 4 defenders rated 6.59 on average, against Parma's 4-man backline averaging 6.80. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

Pisa field 5 midfielders averaging 6.76, versus Parma's 5 rated 6.74. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

Pisa start 1 forward(s) averaging —, compared to 1 for Parma averaging —. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 73% for Pisa and 80% for Parma. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Pisa's starters have collected 21 yellow cards this season, compared to 13 for Parma. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Pisa's starting XI is 28.7 (youngest: S. Canestrelli (25), oldest: Nícolas (37)), while Parma average 27.3 (youngest: E. Del Prato (26), oldest: N. Estévez (30)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Pisa's starters average 23 league appearances each, versus 29 for Parma. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Pisa4-2-3-14-2-3-1Parma
GKDEFMIDFWD
1Nícolas33Calabre.5Canestr.93Barba20Beruatto16Nagy8Marin15Touré23Ioniţă17Sibilli9Gliozzi22Chichiz.15Prato3Osorio30Valenti17Oosterw.24Jurić8Estévez98Man10Vázquez19Sohm45Inglese

Substitutes

Coach: L. D'Angelo

Substitutes

Coach: F. Pecchia

PisaPosition StrengthParma
6.64
Avg Rating
6.78
6.52Goalkeeper (1 v 1)
0G 0A0G 0A
6.59Defender (4 v 4)6.80
1G 0A2G 0A
6.76Midfielder (5 v 5)6.74
1G 0A0G 0A
Pisa4-2-3-1
1GoalkeeperNícolas6.5
33DefenderA. Calabresi6.6
5DefenderS. Canestrelli6.61G
93DefenderF. Barba
20DefenderP. Beruatto
16MidfielderÁ. Nagy
8MidfielderM. Marin6.7
15MidfielderI. Touré6.81G
23MidfielderA. Ioniţă
17MidfielderG. Sibilli
9ForwardE. Gliozzi
Parma4-2-3-1
22GoalkeeperL. Chichizola
15DefenderE. Del Prato6.72G
3DefenderY. Osorio
30DefenderL. Valenti6.9
17DefenderJ. Oosterwolde
24MidfielderS. Jurić
8MidfielderN. Estévez6.7
98MidfielderD. Man
10MidfielderF. Vázquez
19MidfielderS. Sohm
45ForwardR. Inglese

Match Summary

Pisa and Parma drew 0:0. The match was played in Serie B 2022. 3 yellow cards were shown. Pisa had 46% possession while Parma held 54%. Pisa had 10 shots (2 on target) compared to 19 (7 on target) for Parma. Pisa made 5 substitutions, Parma made 4.

Rivalry since 2018

Pisa vs Parma Head to Head Results

8 stretnutí
Pisa
2
wins
Drawn
2
Parma
4
wins
Total goals
14 · 1.8/match
Both scored
3/8 · 38%
Over 2.5
2/8 · 25%

Recent Form

Pisa

LLLLLL

Parma

LWWDDL

Betting Odds & Historical Data

Opening pre-match odds recorded for this fixture at the time it was played. These are historical figures for analytical reference only and do not reflect any current market.

Historical data only — not for betting

This data is sourced from football-data.co.uk and covers historical match results and pre-match odds. These figures do not represent current or live odds and cannot be used for placing bets. Betting is not possible on this website. Provided for analytical and research purposes only.

Head-to-Head Record

Even record

Historical results between these two teams — showing who has dominated this fixture and whether the current odds reflect that pattern.

Pisa1wins
3draws6 meetings
Parma2wins

Goals in This Fixture

How many goals these two teams typically produce when they meet, based on their historical encounters.

1.8

Average goals per game

33%

Games with 3+ goals

50%

Both teams scored

Potential Betting Value Detected

Historical win rate (0%) differs significantly from the market-implied probability (34%) — the odds may underestimate Parma.

Market Summary

Margin: 6.0%

Implied win probabilities calculated from pre-match odds across multiple sources. A higher percentage means the market considered that outcome more likely. Compare these against your own assessment to spot potential value.

Implied Probability

Home 35.3%Draw 31.6%Away 39.0%

Odds Range

1X2
Min2.803.102.50
Max2.903.292.64
Over 2.5: 46.5%Under 2.5: 60.2%
Market favourite: · Even contest

Market Consensus

Professional markets (sharp bookmakers) reflect sharp money and are harder to beat. Public markets are softer. When the two disagree significantly (highlighted in amber), it may indicate a mispriced line worth investigating.

1X2
Professional market33.6%29.6%36.9%
Public market33.1%29.9%37.0%

Pisa vs Parma — margin-removed probabilities

Result vs. Market

Draw
Result vs. Market: Parma (39%)

Result differed from market prediction

Match Statistics

Actual in-game statistics recorded for this match. Shots on target is a strong indicator of attacking pressure and correlates well with expected goals.

PisaHalf-time:00Parma
11Shots19
2Shots on target7

Head-to-Head History

Historical results between these two teams. Bold odds show which outcome was backed by the market — compare against the actual result to assess predictability of this fixture over time.

DateHomeScoreAwayAvg. odds
17/02/24Parma3–2Pisa1.78/3.51/4.75
29/08/23Pisa1–2Parma2.47/2.99/3.04
28/02/23Parma0–1Pisa2.09/3.28/3.85
08/10/22Pisa0–0Parma2.83/3.16/2.56
22/02/22Pisa0–0Parma2.17/3.16/3.54
26/09/21Parma1–1Pisa2.28/3.12/3.43

Home Record / Away Record

Aggregated season statistics from all available historical data. Use these to assess each team's overall form, scoring frequency, and tendency for high-scoring matches.

Home Record: Pisa

W 124D 122L 108
Over 2.542
Goals scored441

Away Record: Parma

W 89D 67L 42
Over 2.543
Goals scored284

Data: football-data.co.uk

Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026