Menu

Grasshoppers vs Fc Winterthur

Letzigrund, Zurich12 May 2026 at 19:30

Match Events

Grasshoppers
FC Winterthur
Kick Off
7′
P. Kasami

assist: S. Sidler

H. ImouraneLee Young-Jun
18′
Half Time
D. Abels

Penalty

60′
N. RissiM. Ullmann
61′
Lee Young-Jun

assist: S. Krasniqi

62′
67′
S. DiabyR. Smith
67′
M. KryeziuR. Arnold
67′
S. SidlerE. Maluvunu
D. Abels

assist: J. Asp

70′
78′
A. JankewitzR. Buess
83′
N. BurkartD. Ulrich
S. KrasniqiS. Marques
87′
Full Time

Match Statistics

6Shots on Goal5
2Shots off Goal5
14Total Shots14
6Blocked Shots4
10Shots insidebox5
4Shots outsidebox9
11Fouls12
10Corner Kicks6
4Offsides0
49%Ball Possession51%
5Yellow Cards1
0Red Cards0
3Goalkeeper Saves3
296Total passes313
217Passes accurate213
73%Passes %68%
1.49expected_goals1.43
-0.90goals_prevented-0.90

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Grasshoppers is 6.76, compared to 6.79 for FC Winterthur. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Grasshoppers's highest-rated starter is J. Hammel (6.99), while FC Winterthur's best-rated player is S. Kapino (7.29).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Grasshoppers have contributed 17 goals and 15 assists this season, led by J. Asp (8G). FC Winterthur's starters account for 31 goals and 22 assists, spearheaded by A. Hunziker (11G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

Grasshoppers deploy 4 defenders rated 6.76 on average, against FC Winterthur's 4-man backline averaging 6.53. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

Grasshoppers field 5 midfielders averaging 6.73, versus FC Winterthur's 5 rated 6.88. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

Grasshoppers start 1 forward(s) averaging 6.62, compared to 1 for FC Winterthur averaging 6.88. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 69% for Grasshoppers and 71% for FC Winterthur. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Grasshoppers's starters have collected 36 yellow cards this season, compared to 40 for FC Winterthur. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Grasshoppers's starting XI is 23.7 (youngest: J. Asp (19), oldest: M. Frey (31)), while FC Winterthur average 25.9 (youngest: L. Luthi (22), oldest: P. Kasami (33)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Grasshoppers's starters average 23 league appearances each, versus 26 for FC Winterthur. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Grasshoppers4-1-4-14-2-3-1FC Winterthur
GKDEFMIDFWD
71Hammel2Abels20Ngom27Kohler57Rissi5Imourane54Krasniqi8Meyer14Zvonarek10Asp99Frey1Kapino24Sidler21Luthi31Kryeziu18Diaby45Jankewi.23Kasami10Schneid.8Golliard99Burkart17Hunziker

Substitutes

Coach: Gernot Messner

Substitutes

Coach: Patrick Rahmen

GrasshoppersPosition StrengthFC Winterthur
6.76
Avg Rating
6.79
6.99Goalkeeper (1 v 1)7.29
0G 0A0G 0A
6.76Defender (4 v 4)6.53
3G 2A2G 4A
6.73Midfielder (5 v 5)6.88
13G 12A18G 14A
6.62Forward (1 v 1)6.88
1G 1A11G 4A
Grasshoppers4-1-4-1
71GoalkeeperJ. Hammel7.0
2DefenderD. Abels6.93G1A
20DefenderM. Ngom6.81A
27DefenderS. Kohler6.9
57DefenderN. Rissi6.5
5MidfielderH. Imourane6.61G
54MidfielderS. Krasniqi6.51G2A
8MidfielderT. Meyer6.81G1A
14MidfielderL. Zvonarek6.72G2A
10MidfielderJ. Asp7.08G7A
99ForwardM. Frey6.61G1A
FC Winterthur4-2-3-1
1GoalkeeperS. Kapino7.3
24DefenderS. Sidler6.61G3A
21DefenderL. Luthi6.6
31DefenderM. Kryeziu6.4
18DefenderS. Diaby6.51G1A
45MidfielderA. Jankewitz6.82G3A
23MidfielderP. Kasami7.05G
10MidfielderR. Schneider6.92G3A
8MidfielderT. Golliard6.84G6A
99MidfielderN. Burkart7.05G2A
17ForwardA. Hunziker6.911G4A

Match Summary

Grasshoppers defeated FC Winterthur 3:2. The match was played in Super League 2025. Goals were scored by P. Kasami 7′, P. Kasami 10′, D. Abels 60′ (pen.), Lee Young-Jun 62′, D. Abels 70′. 6 yellow cards were shown. Grasshoppers had 49% possession while FC Winterthur held 51%. Grasshoppers had 14 shots (6 on target) compared to 14 (5 on target) for FC Winterthur. Expected goals: Grasshoppers 1.49 — FC Winterthur 1.43. Grasshoppers made 3 substitutions, FC Winterthur made 5.

Rivalry since 2019

Grasshoppers vs FC Winterthur Head to Head Results

23 stretnutí
Grasshoppers
7
wins
Drawn
6
FC Winterthur
10
wins
Total goals
60 · 2.6/match
Both scored
12/23 · 52%
Over 2.5
10/23 · 43%

Recent Form

Grasshoppers

WWLLLL

FC Winterthur

LLWDLL

Match Prediction

Grasshoppers

35%

Home win

 

35%

Draw

FC Winterthur

30%

Away win

Model advice

Double chance : Grasshoppers or draw

43%Form57%
33%Attack67%
55%Defence45%
50%Head-to-head50%

Bookmaker Odds

13 bookmakers

Best price

Grasshoppers

2.23

Pinnacle

Draw

3.70

Betfair

FC Winterthur

3.30

Unibet

Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 17 May 2026