28 February 2021 at 12:00

Referee: M. Al Hakim

Match Summary

IFK Goteborg and GIF Sundsvall drew 1:1. The match was played in Svenska Cupen 2020. Goals were scored by L. Hallenius 63′, T. Sana 90′ (pen.). 2 yellow cards were shown. IFK Goteborg made 3 substitutions, GIF Sundsvall made 4.

Match Events

Key match events between IFK Goteborg and GIF Sundsvall — 2 goals and 2 cards recorded during the match.

IFK Goteborg
GIF Sundsvall
Kick Off
Half Time
62′
T. StenshagenD. Myrestam
62′
N. DahlströmR. Lundström
P. Wernbloom72′
K. YakobA. Nygaard
73′
G. NorlinH. Aiesh
73′
P. WernbloomS. Thern
73′
76′
E. AnderssonJ. Carström
80′
D. StenssonL. Nåvik
T. Sana

Penalty

90+4′
Full Time

Lineups

IFK Goteborg lined up in a — formation under R. Nilsson, while GIF Sundsvall deployed a — under H. Åhnstrand.

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for IFK Goteborg is 7.21, compared to 6.66 for GIF Sundsvall. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. IFK Goteborg's highest-rated starter is A. Erlingmark (7.21), while GIF Sundsvall's best-rated player is P. Engblom (6.75).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of IFK Goteborg have contributed 0 goals and 1 assists this season, led by —. GIF Sundsvall's starters account for 1 goals and 2 assists, spearheaded by P. Engblom (1G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Midfield Control

IFK Goteborg field 11 midfielders averaging 7.21, versus GIF Sundsvall's 11 rated 6.66. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 51% for IFK Goteborg and —% for GIF Sundsvall. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

IFK Goteborg's starters have collected 5 yellow cards this season, compared to 0 for GIF Sundsvall. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of IFK Goteborg's starting XI is 27.5 (youngest: A. Erlingmark (27), oldest: G. Norlin (28)), while GIF Sundsvall average 32.5 (youngest: D. Olsson (31), oldest: P. Engblom (34)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

IFK Goteborg's starters average 28 league appearances each, versus 23 for GIF Sundsvall. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

IFK GoteborgPosition StrengthGIF Sundsvall
7.21
Avg Rating
6.66
7.21Midfielder (11 v 11)6.66
0G 1A1G 2A
IFK Goteborg
0MidfielderO. Söderberg
0MidfielderM. Bjärsmyr
0MidfielderC. Johansson
0MidfielderA. Jallow
0MidfielderP. Wernbloom
0MidfielderT. Sana
0MidfielderG. Norlin
0MidfielderA. Erlingmark7.21A
0MidfielderK. Yakob
0MidfielderA. Yusuf
0MidfielderR. Söder
GIF Sundsvall
0MidfielderA. Andersson
0MidfielderA. Blomqvist
0MidfielderD. Olsson6.6
0MidfielderD. Stensson
0MidfielderA. Eriksson
0MidfielderT. Stenshagen
0MidfielderN. Dahlström
0MidfielderP. Silfwer
0MidfielderE. Andersson
0MidfielderL. Hallenius
0MidfielderP. Engblom6.81G2A

Recent Form

In their last 6 matches, IFK Goteborg have recorded 3 wins, 2 draws and 1 defeats. GIF Sundsvall show 0 wins, 3 draws and 3 losses from their last 6 outings.

IFK Goteborg

LWWDWD

GIF Sundsvall

DLLDDL
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 18 Apr 2026