Menu

If Elfsborg vs Helsingborg

22 February 2026 at 14:00
Home

IF Elfsborg

40
Away

Helsingborg

Match Events

IF Elfsborg
Helsingborg
Kick Off
7′J. Voelkerling
L. PerssonT. Gorefalt
12′
A. Zeneli
27′
31′
Half Time
A. NordinJ. Hasselqvist
46′
A. Zeneli
54′
T. RupilS. Asoma
61′
61′
V. OkekeT. Silverholt
61′
J. BeckA. Hellemaa
J. Magnusson67′
73′
J. MagnussonWenderson
73′
F. IhlerJ. Abdullai
A. JohanssonC. Ljung
80′
A. AkimeyL. Hedenberg
80′
81′
A. ZeneliD. Krasniqi
Full Time

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for IF Elfsborg is 6.93, compared to 6.88 for Helsingborg. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. IF Elfsborg's highest-rated starter is J. Magnusson (7.08), while Helsingborg's best-rated player is A. Johansson (7.60).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of IF Elfsborg have contributed 17 goals and 7 assists this season, led by F. Ihler (7G). Helsingborg's starters account for 2 goals and 3 assists, spearheaded by A. Johansson (2G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Midfield Control

IF Elfsborg field 11 midfielders averaging 6.93, versus Helsingborg's 11 rated 6.88. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 46% for IF Elfsborg and —% for Helsingborg. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

IF Elfsborg's starters have collected 21 yellow cards this season, compared to 16 for Helsingborg. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of IF Elfsborg's starting XI is 24.7 (youngest: V. Okeke (19), oldest: A. Zeneli (30)), while Helsingborg average 22.5 (youngest: A. Nordin (18), oldest: J. Brattberg (29)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

IF Elfsborg's starters average 18 league appearances each, versus 22 for Helsingborg. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

IF ElfsborgPosition StrengthHelsingborg
6.93
Avg Rating
6.88
6.93Midfielder (11 v 11)6.88
17G 7A2G 3A
IF Elfsborg
31MidfielderI. Pettersson7.0
6MidfielderR. Wikstrom7.06G
29MidfielderI. Buhari6.91G
4MidfielderT. Isherwood
20MidfielderG. Rapp6.61A
18MidfielderJ. Magnusson7.11G1A
10MidfielderS. Olsson7.02A
27MidfielderV. Okeke
19MidfielderJ. Beck
24MidfielderF. Ihler6.87G1A
9MidfielderA. Zeneli6.92G2A
Helsingborg
1MidfielderJ. Brattberg6.9
42MidfielderF. Awodesu
45MidfielderJ. Voelkerling
44MidfielderD. N'Diaye
5MidfielderS. Bengtsson6.8
9MidfielderA. Akimey6.71A
14MidfielderL. Kjellnas6.82A
31MidfielderA. Nordin6.5
37MidfielderT. Rupil
35MidfielderL. Persson
16MidfielderA. Johansson7.62G

Match Summary

IF Elfsborg defeated Helsingborg 4:0. The match was played in Svenska Cupen 2025. Goals were scored by A. Zeneli 27′, R. Wikstrom 51′, A. Zeneli 54′, A. Hellemaa 63′. 3 yellow cards were shown, 1 red cards. IF Elfsborg made 5 substitutions, Helsingborg made 5.

Recent Form

IF Elfsborg

LWWLLL

Helsingborg

DLLWDL

Match Prediction

IF Elfsborg

45%

Home win

 

45%

Draw

Helsingborg

10%

Away win

Model advice

Combo Double chance : IF Elfsborg or draw and -3.5 goals

50%Form50%
50%Attack50%
0%Defence0%
71%Head-to-head29%
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 2 May 2026