Menu

Genclerbirligi S K vs Trabzonspor

Eryaman Stadium, Ankara13 May 2026 at 18:30

Match Events

Gençlerbirliği S.K.
Trabzonspor
Kick Off
Half Time
E. A. Aslan

assist: O. Diabate

62′
65′
M. LovikO. Tufan
65′
O. ZubkovU. Nayir
65′
A. NwakaemeFelipe Augusto
E. A. AslanF. Tongya
74′
78′
A. Celik

Own Goal

E. KemalogluT. Dele-Bashiru
82′
90+2′Ozan Tufan
F. Ayaz OzcanC. Canak
90+2′
90+8′
C. Inao OulaiB. Baskan
90′
E. Muci

assist: O. Tufan

Full Time

Match Statistics

3Shots on Goal5
4Shots off Goal4
9Total Shots11
2Blocked Shots2
5Shots insidebox8
4Shots outsidebox3
16Fouls17
1Corner Kicks8
1Offsides1
36%Ball Possession64%
5Yellow Cards3
0Red Cards0
3Goalkeeper Saves2
279Total passes489
218Passes accurate425
78%Passes %87%
0expected_goals0
0goals_prevented0

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Gençlerbirliği S.K. is 7.28, compared to 7.59 for Trabzonspor. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Gençlerbirliği S.K.'s highest-rated starter is E. Erenturk (9.00), while Trabzonspor's best-rated player is A. Onana (10.00).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Gençlerbirliği S.K. have contributed 1 goals and 0 assists this season, led by F. Uzum (1G). Trabzonspor's starters account for 0 goals and 0 assists, spearheaded by —. Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

Gençlerbirliği S.K. deploy 4 defenders rated 6.80 on average, against Trabzonspor's 4-man backline averaging 7.03. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

Gençlerbirliği S.K. field 5 midfielders averaging 6.90, versus Trabzonspor's 5 rated 7.50. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

Gençlerbirliği S.K. start 1 forward(s) averaging —, compared to 1 for Trabzonspor averaging 7.30. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 74% for Gençlerbirliği S.K. and 86% for Trabzonspor. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Gençlerbirliği S.K.'s starters have collected 4 yellow cards this season, compared to 6 for Trabzonspor. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Gençlerbirliği S.K.'s starting XI is 23.3 (youngest: Y. Aydar (17), oldest: M. Hanousek (32)), while Trabzonspor average 25.4 (youngest: C. Inao Oulai (19), oldest: A. Nwakaeme (36)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Gençlerbirliği S.K.'s starters average 3 league appearances each, versus 4 for Trabzonspor. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Gençlerbirliği S.K.4-1-4-14-2-3-1Trabzonspor
GKDEFMIDFWD
18Erenturk88Uzum44Celik93Aydar23Hanousek42Diabate11Gurpuz8Onur61Kemalog.17Aslan16Ozcan24Onana20Pina74Malkoco.27Nwaiwu14Lovik42Oulai8Bouchou.22Zubkov10Muci9Nwakaeme30Onuachu

Substitutes

Coach: Ozcan Bizati

Substitutes

Coach: Fatih Tekke

Gençlerbirliği S.K.Position StrengthTrabzonspor
7.28
Avg Rating
7.59
9.00Goalkeeper (1 v 1)10.00
0G 0A0G 0A
6.80Defender (4 v 4)7.03
1G 0A0G 0A
6.90Midfielder (5 v 5)7.50
0G 0A0G 0A
Forward (1 v 1)7.30
0G 0A0G 0A
Gençlerbirliği S.K.4-1-4-1
18GoalkeeperE. Erenturk9.0
88DefenderF. Uzum7.01G
44DefenderA. Celik
93DefenderY. Aydar
23DefenderM. Hanousek6.6
42MidfielderO. Diabate6.9
11MidfielderG. Gurpuz
8MidfielderS. Onur6.9
61MidfielderE. Kemaloglu
17MidfielderE. A. Aslan
16ForwardF. Ayaz Ozcan
Trabzonspor4-2-3-1
24GoalkeeperA. Onana10.0
20DefenderW. Pina7.3
74DefenderS. Malkocoglu
27DefenderC. Nwaiwu7.5
14DefenderM. Lovik6.3
42MidfielderC. Inao Oulai6.9
8MidfielderB. Bouchouari6.7
22MidfielderO. Zubkov7.5
10MidfielderE. Muci8.7
9MidfielderA. Nwakaeme7.7
30ForwardP. Onuachu7.3

Match Summary

Trabzonspor defeated Gençlerbirliği S.K. 2:1. The match was played in Türkiye Kupası 2025. Goals were scored by E. A. Aslan 62′, A. Celik 78′ (o.g.), E. Muci 90′. 8 yellow cards were shown. Gençlerbirliği S.K. had 36% possession while Trabzonspor held 64%. Gençlerbirliği S.K. had 9 shots (3 on target) compared to 11 (5 on target) for Trabzonspor. Gençlerbirliği S.K. made 3 substitutions, Trabzonspor made 4.

Rivalry since 2011

Gençlerbirliği S.K. vs Trabzonspor Head to Head Results

20 stretnutí
Gençlerbirliği S.K.
5
wins
Drawn
6
Trabzonspor
9
wins
Total goals
55 · 2.8/match
Both scored
11/20 · 55%
Over 2.5
11/20 · 55%

Recent Form

Gençlerbirliği S.K.

LWLWWL

Trabzonspor

LWWDLD

Match Prediction

Gençlerbirliği S.K.

10%

Home win

 

45%

Draw

Trabzonspor

45%

Away win

Model advice

Combo Winner : Trabzonspor and +1.5 goals

52%Form48%
44%Attack56%
44%Defence56%
20%Head-to-head80%

Bookmaker Odds

13 bookmakers

Best price

Gençlerbirliği S.K.

6.09

Pinnacle

Draw

4.18

Pinnacle

Trabzonspor

1.85

888Sport

Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 17 May 2026