27 September 2016 at 18:45

04
Full Time

Match Summary

Juventus defeated Dinamo Zagreb 4:0. The match was played in UEFA Champions League 2016. Goals were scored by M. Pjanić 24′, G. Higuaín 31′, P. Dybala 57′, Dani Alves 85′. Dinamo Zagreb had 28% possession while Juventus held 72%. Dinamo Zagreb had 4 shots (0 on target) compared to 17 (7 on target) for Juventus. Dinamo Zagreb made 3 substitutions, Juventus made 3.

Match Events

Key match events between Dinamo Zagreb and Juventus — 4 goals and 0 cards recorded during the match.

Dinamo Zagreb
Juventus
Kick Off
24′
M. Pjanić
31′
G. Higuaín

assist: M. Pjanić

Half Time
46′
M. PjanićJ. Cuadrado
JonasI. Fiolić
48′
57′
P. Dybala

assist: Dani Alves

J. FernándesA. Hodžić
58′
68′
A. BarzagliM. Pjaca
71′
G. HiguaínM. Mandžukić
D. AntolićPaulo Machado
72′
85′
Dani Alves
Full Time

Match Statistics

Dinamo Zagreb had 28% possession against Juventus's 72%. Dinamo Zagreb registered 4 shots (0 on target) while Juventus managed 17 (7 on target). Corner kicks: 0–6. Fouls committed: 10–13.

0Shots on Goal7
4Shots off Goal6
4Total Shots17
0Blocked Shots4
1Shots insidebox10
3Shots outsidebox7
10Fouls13
0Corner Kicks6
1Offsides1
28%Ball Possession72%
0Yellow Cards0
0Red Cards0
3Goalkeeper Saves0
305Total passes777
219Passes accurate696
72%Passes %90%

Lineups

Dinamo Zagreb lined up in a 4-3-3 formation under Ž. Sopić, while Juventus deployed a 3-5-2 under M. Allegri.

Defensive Solidity

Dinamo Zagreb deploy 4 defenders rated — on average, against Juventus's 5-man backline averaging —. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

Dinamo Zagreb field 4 midfielders averaging —, versus Juventus's 4 rated —. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

Dinamo Zagreb start 2 forward(s) averaging —, compared to 2 for Juventus averaging —. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Dinamo Zagreb4-3-33-5-2Juventus
GKDEFMIDFWD
98Šemper22Sigali23Schilde.19Pivarić26Benković8Antolić18Pavičić5Jonas11Fernánd.2Soudani7Šitum1Buffon15Barzagli33Evra23Alves19Bonucci3Chielli.6Khedira11Hernanes5Pjanić9Higuaín21Dybala

Substitutes

Coach: Ž. Sopić

Substitutes

Coach: M. Allegri

Dinamo ZagrebPosition StrengthJuventus
Dinamo Zagreb4-3-3
98GoalkeeperA. Šemper
22DefenderL. Sigali
23DefenderG. Schildenfeld
19DefenderJ. Pivarić
26DefenderF. Benković
8MidfielderD. Antolić
18MidfielderD. Pavičić
5MidfielderJonas
11MidfielderJ. Fernándes
2ForwardE. Soudani
7ForwardM. Šitum
Juventus3-5-2
15DefenderA. Barzagli
33DefenderP. Evra
23DefenderDani Alves
19DefenderL. Bonucci
3DefenderG. Chiellini
1MidfielderG. Buffon
6MidfielderS. Khedira
11MidfielderHernanes
5MidfielderM. Pjanić
9ForwardG. Higuaín
21ForwardP. Dybala

Recent Form

In their last 6 matches, Dinamo Zagreb have recorded 5 wins, 1 draws and 0 defeats. Juventus show 5 wins, 1 draws and 0 losses from their last 6 outings.

Dinamo Zagreb

DWWWWW

Juventus

WWWDWW

Dinamo Zagreb vs Juventus Head to Head Results

Dinamo Zagreb and Juventus have met 1 times — Dinamo Zagreb won 0, Juventus won 1, with 0 draws. Their rivalry dates back to 2016. Juventus leads the head-to-head with 1 victories from 1 meetings. A combined 2 goals have been scored across these fixtures, averaging 2.00 per match (0 for the home side, 2 for the visitors). Both teams scored in 0 matches (0%). Over 2.5 goals landed in 0 games (0%), making it a fixture that tends to produce goals. The highest-scoring encounter finished 2–0 in 2016.

0

Dinamo Zagreb

0

Drawn

1

Juventus

Goals: 0Goals: 2

Recent Meetings (1)

7 Dec 2016Juventus2 – 0Dinamo Zagreb
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 23 Apr 2026