Match Summary
Shelbourne and FC Zurich drew 0:0. The match was played in UEFA Europa Conference League 2024. 4 yellow cards were shown. Shelbourne had 34% possession while FC Zurich held 66%. Shelbourne had 8 shots (0 on target) compared to 19 (6 on target) for FC Zurich. Shelbourne made 5 substitutions, FC Zurich made 4.
Match Events
Key match events between Shelbourne and FC Zurich — 0 goals and 4 cards recorded during the match.
Match Statistics
Shelbourne had 34% possession against FC Zurich's 66%. Shelbourne registered 8 shots (0 on target) while FC Zurich managed 19 (6 on target). Corner kicks: 3–3. Fouls committed: 8–14.
Lineups
Shelbourne lined up in a 4-3-3 formation under D. Duff, while FC Zurich deployed a 4-3-3 under R. Moniz.
Squad Ratings
The overall squad rating for Shelbourne is 6.73, compared to 6.90 for FC Zurich. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Shelbourne's highest-rated starter is J. Martin (6.77), while FC Zurich's best-rated player is Y. Brecher (7.20).
Attacking Output
The starting XI of Shelbourne have contributed 0 goals and 0 assists this season, led by —. FC Zurich's starters account for 2 goals and 5 assists, spearheaded by M. Gómez (1G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.
Defensive Solidity
Shelbourne deploy 4 defenders rated — on average, against FC Zurich's 4-man backline averaging 6.87. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.
Midfield Control
Shelbourne field 3 midfielders averaging 6.69, versus FC Zurich's 3 rated —. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.
Forward Threat
Shelbourne start 3 forward(s) averaging 6.77, compared to 3 for FC Zurich averaging 6.64. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.
Passing & Build-Up
Passing accuracy averages 77% for Shelbourne and —% for FC Zurich. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.
Discipline
Shelbourne's starters have collected 3 yellow cards this season, compared to 9 for FC Zurich. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.
Age & Experience
The average age of Shelbourne's starting XI is 29.0 (youngest: J. Martin (26), oldest: J. O'Sullivan (32)), while FC Zurich average 26.3 (youngest: U. Emmanuel (21), oldest: Y. Brecher (32)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.
Squad Depth
Shelbourne's starters average 10 league appearances each, versus 30 for FC Zurich. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.
Substitutes
Substitutes
Recent Form
In their last 6 matches, Shelbourne have recorded 1 wins, 2 draws and 3 defeats. FC Zurich show 2 wins, 0 draws and 4 losses from their last 6 outings.
Shelbourne
FC Zurich
API data: 15 Mar 2026