Match Summary
FC Lugano and Pafos drew 2:2. The match was played in UEFA Europa Conference League 2024. Goals were scored by A. Saipi 4′ (o.g.), H. Mahmoud 7′, M. Bottani 33′, David Goldar 90′. 9 yellow cards were shown. FC Lugano had 48% possession while Pafos held 52%. FC Lugano had 12 shots (5 on target) compared to 15 (3 on target) for Pafos. Expected goals: FC Lugano 2.42 — Pafos 0.77. FC Lugano made 5 substitutions, Pafos made 5.
Match Events
Key match events between FC Lugano and Pafos — 4 goals and 9 cards recorded during the match.
Own Goal
assist: M. Zanotti
assist: M. Zanotti
assist: M. Tanković
Match Statistics
FC Lugano had 48% possession against Pafos's 52%. FC Lugano registered 12 shots (5 on target) while Pafos managed 15 (3 on target). Corner kicks: 2–4. Fouls committed: 15–7.
Lineups
FC Lugano lined up in a 4-2-3-1 formation under M. Croci-Torti, while Pafos deployed a 4-1-4-1 under Carcedo.
Squad Ratings
The overall squad rating for FC Lugano is 6.92, compared to 6.85 for Pafos. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. FC Lugano's highest-rated starter is R. Steffen (8.00), while Pafos's best-rated player is Pêpê Rodrigues (7.17).
Attacking Output
The starting XI of FC Lugano have contributed 3 goals and 1 assists this season, led by A. Papadopoulos (1G). Pafos's starters account for 3 goals and 1 assists, spearheaded by D. Luckassen (1G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.
Defensive Solidity
FC Lugano deploy 4 defenders rated 6.58 on average, against Pafos's 4-man backline averaging 6.90. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.
Midfield Control
FC Lugano field 5 midfielders averaging 6.96, versus Pafos's 5 rated 7.17. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.
Forward Threat
FC Lugano start 1 forward(s) averaging 7.20, compared to 1 for Pafos averaging 6.47. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.
Passing & Build-Up
Passing accuracy averages 81% for FC Lugano and —% for Pafos. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.
Discipline
FC Lugano's starters have collected 4 yellow cards this season, compared to 2 for Pafos. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.
Age & Experience
The average age of FC Lugano's starting XI is 26.6 (youngest: A. Hajdari (22), oldest: R. Steffen (34)), while Pafos average 28.7 (youngest: Pêpê Rodrigues (28), oldest: D. Luckassen (30)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.
Squad Depth
FC Lugano's starters average 1 league appearances each, versus 10 for Pafos. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.
Substitutes
Recent Form
In their last 6 matches, FC Lugano have recorded 2 wins, 2 draws and 2 defeats. Pafos show 4 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses from their last 6 outings.
FC Lugano
Pafos
API data: 15 Mar 2026