Menu

Angel City W vs Utah Royals W

BMO Stadium, Los Angeles10 May 2025 at 03:30

Match Events

Angel City W
Utah Royals W
Kick Off
Half Time
C. EmslieC. Press
65′
C. Press

assist: A. Kennedy

66′
67′
C. KizerA. Solorzano
84′
D. FoedererA. Loera
K. FullerMaiara Niehues
85′
K. ZelemM. Hammond
85′
S. KIngM. Reid
85′
87′
A. Tejada JimenezK. Ream
G. ThompsonM. Moriya
88′
90+2′
B. MozingoA. Guzman
Full Time

Match Statistics

5Shots on Goal7
8Shots off Goal5
18Total Shots15
5Blocked Shots3
11Shots insidebox4
7Shots outsidebox11
12Fouls4
6Corner Kicks4
2Offsides2
58%Ball Possession42%
3Yellow Cards0
0Red Cards0
7Goalkeeper Saves3
420Total passes311
338Passes accurate234
80%Passes %75%
0expected_goals0
0goals_prevented0

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Angel City W is 6.65, compared to 6.87 for Utah Royals W. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Angel City W's highest-rated starter is G. Thompson (7.21), while Utah Royals W's best-rated player is K. Del Fava (7.29).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Angel City W have contributed 4 goals and 3 assists this season, led by G. Thompson (2G). Utah Royals W's starters account for 1 goals and 4 assists, spearheaded by M. Tanaka (1G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

Angel City W deploy 2 defenders rated 6.68 on average, against Utah Royals W's 3-man backline averaging 7.08. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

Angel City W field 8 midfielders averaging 6.66, versus Utah Royals W's 7 rated 6.78. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

Angel City W start 0 forward(s) averaging —, compared to 1 for Utah Royals W averaging 6.75. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 77% for Angel City W and 68% for Utah Royals W. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Angel City W's starters have collected 2 yellow cards this season, compared to 6 for Utah Royals W. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Angel City W's starting XI is 23.9 (youngest: K. Fuller (18), oldest: S. Gorden (33)), while Utah Royals W average 26.3 (youngest: A. Tejada Jimenez (23), oldest: M. Tanaka (31)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Angel City W's starters average 6 league appearances each, versus 8 for Utah Royals W. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Angel City W4-2-3-14-3-3Utah Royals W
GKDEFMIDFWD
19Anderson20Thompson11Gorden3KIng16Vignola14Kennedy4Zelem10Emslie17Fuller21Thompson33Tiernan1McGlynn7Thomsen8Fava5Flynn16Pogarch22Foederer11Tanaka17Jimenez13Mozingo9Sentnor25Kizer

Substitutes

Coach: Alexander Straus

Substitutes

Coach: Jimmy Coenraets

Angel City WPosition StrengthUtah Royals W
6.65
Avg Rating
6.87
6.60Goalkeeper (1 v 0)
0G 0A
6.68Defender (2 v 3)7.08
0G 1A0G 0A
6.66Midfielder (8 v 7)6.78
4G 2A1G 4A
Forward (0 v 1)6.75
0G 0A
Angel City W4-2-3-1
19GoalkeeperA. Anderson6.6
11DefenderS. Gorden6.71A
16DefenderM. Vignola
20MidfielderG. Thompson7.22G
3MidfielderS. KIng6.5
14MidfielderA. Kennedy
4MidfielderK. Zelem
10MidfielderC. Emslie6.3
17MidfielderK. Fuller6.91G2A
21MidfielderA. Thompson
33MidfielderR. Tiernan6.41G
Utah Royals W4-3-3
7DefenderJ. Thomsen6.9
8DefenderK. Del Fava7.3
16DefenderM. Pogarch
1MidfielderA. McGlynn
5MidfielderL. Flynn
22MidfielderD. Foederer
11MidfielderM. Tanaka6.91G3A
17MidfielderA. Tejada Jimenez6.81A
13MidfielderB. Mozingo6.6
9MidfielderA. Sentnor
25ForwardC. Kizer6.8

Match Summary

Angel City W defeated Utah Royals W 2:0. The match was played in NWSL Women 2025. Goals were scored by C. Press 66′, A. Thompson 90′. 3 yellow cards were shown. Angel City W had 58% possession while Utah Royals W held 42%. Angel City W had 18 shots (5 on target) compared to 15 (7 on target) for Utah Royals W. Angel City W made 5 substitutions, Utah Royals W made 4.

Rivalry since 2024

Angel City W vs Utah Royals W Head to Head Results

4 stretnutí
Angel City W
1
wins
Drawn
2
Utah Royals W
1
wins
Total goals
6 · 1.5/match
Both scored
2/4 · 50%
Over 2.5
1/4 · 25%

Recent Form

Angel City W

LLLLWW

Utah Royals W

DWWWWW
Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 11 May 2026