Menu

Kansas City W vs Chicago Red Stars W

CPKC Stadium, Kansas City10 May 2026 at 17:25
Referee: Laura Rodriguez

Match Events

Kansas City W
Chicago Red Stars W
Kick Off
17′
M. AlozieB. A. Pinto
T. Chawinga

assist: C. Bethune

22′
Half Time
T. Chawinga
47′
T. Chawinga

assist: M. Cooper

50′
61′
M. HayashiJ. Joseph
B. FeistK. Scott
71′
C. BethuneH. Hopkins
71′
T. ChawingaA. White
77′
77′
A. FarmerM. Lopez Millan
77′
J. HuitemaI. Chacon
77′
N. GomesM. Johnson
M. CooperP. Hocking
81′
I. RodriguezE. Bravo-Young
81′
Full Time

Match Statistics

9Shots on Goal4
8Shots off Goal4
18Total Shots11
1Blocked Shots3
16Shots insidebox6
2Shots outsidebox5
11Fouls11
6Corner Kicks3
2Offsides0
47%Ball Possession53%
0Yellow Cards1
0Red Cards0
4Goalkeeper Saves6
370Total passes431
293Passes accurate342
79%Passes %79%
0expected_goals0
0goals_prevented0

Lineups

Squad Ratings

The overall squad rating for Kansas City W is 6.83, compared to 6.62 for Chicago Red Stars W. This metric is derived from each player's average match rating across all league appearances this season — anything above 7.00 is considered strong, while below 6.50 signals inconsistency. Kansas City W's highest-rated starter is T. Chawinga (7.35), while Chicago Red Stars W's best-rated player is J. Huitema (6.88).

Attacking Output

The starting XI of Kansas City W have contributed 8 goals and 7 assists this season, led by T. Chawinga (3G). Chicago Red Stars W's starters account for 3 goals and 2 assists, spearheaded by J. Huitema (2G). Goals reflect clinical finishing and chance creation, while assists highlight the ability to unlock defences through through-balls, crosses, and set pieces.

Defensive Solidity

Kansas City W deploy 4 defenders rated 6.67 on average, against Chicago Red Stars W's 4-man backline averaging 6.56. Higher defensive ratings suggest better positional awareness, fewer individual errors, and a greater likelihood of keeping clean sheets. The rating accounts for tackles won, interceptions, aerial duels, and blocks throughout the season.

Midfield Control

Kansas City W field 3 midfielders averaging 6.93, versus Chicago Red Stars W's 3 rated 6.59. Midfield ratings reflect passing accuracy, interceptions, key passes, and overall control of possession — the team that dominates midfield typically dictates the tempo and territory of the match.

Forward Threat

Kansas City W start 3 forward(s) averaging 7.01, compared to 3 for Chicago Red Stars W averaging 6.69. Forward ratings capture shot accuracy, movement off the ball, dribbling success, and involvement in build-up play — they indicate who carries the greater goal threat on the day.

Passing & Build-Up

Passing accuracy averages 72% for Kansas City W and 76% for Chicago Red Stars W. Higher passing accuracy generally indicates a possession-based style with patient build-up through the thirds, while lower figures may suggest a more direct, counter-attacking approach with long balls and quick transitions.

Discipline

Kansas City W's starters have collected 4 yellow cards this season, compared to 3 for Chicago Red Stars W. Yellow cards reflect how aggressively a team presses and tackles — a high count may indicate a physical, high-pressing style but also risks suspensions and late free-kicks in dangerous areas.

Age & Experience

The average age of Kansas City W's starting XI is 26.4 (youngest: A. Sentnor (21), oldest: L. LaBonta (32)), while Chicago Red Stars W average 27.3 (youngest: M. Hayashi (21), oldest: A. Naeher (37)). Younger squads typically offer pace, energy, and pressing intensity, while experienced lineups bring composure, game management, and the ability to handle high-pressure moments.

Squad Depth

Kansas City W's starters average 7 league appearances each, versus 7 for Chicago Red Stars W. High appearance counts indicate an established, well-drilled unit that the manager trusts week in and week out. Lower figures may suggest rotation, injuries, or emerging players still earning their place in the team.

Kansas City W4-3-34-3-3Chicago Red Stars W
GKDEFMIDFWD
23Lorena2Rouse7Ball27Sharples18Rodrigu.10LaBonta8Bethune22Feist17Cooper21Sentnor6Chawinga1Naeher4Bike6Hendrich3Staab5Alozie16Hayashi25Farmer7Grosso11Gomes99Huitema24Gareis

Substitutes

Coach: Chris Armas

Substitutes

Coach: Martin Sjogren

Kansas City WPosition StrengthChicago Red Stars W
6.83
Avg Rating
6.62
6.70Goalkeeper (1 v 1)6.74
0G 0A0G 0A
6.67Defender (4 v 4)6.56
0G 2A0G 0A
6.93Midfielder (3 v 3)6.59
2G 2A0G 0A
7.01Forward (3 v 3)6.69
6G 3A3G 2A
Kansas City W4-3-3
23GoalkeeperLorena6.7
2DefenderL. Rouse6.6
7DefenderE. Ball6.7
27DefenderK. Sharples6.61A
18DefenderI. Rodriguez6.91A
10MidfielderL. LaBonta6.7
8MidfielderC. Bethune7.02G2A
22MidfielderB. Feist7.0
17ForwardM. Cooper7.02G1A
21ForwardA. Sentnor6.71G1A
6ForwardT. Chawinga7.33G1A
Chicago Red Stars W4-3-3
1GoalkeeperA. Naeher6.7
4DefenderJ. Bike6.4
6DefenderK. Hendrich6.7
3DefenderS. Staab6.7
5DefenderM. Alozie6.4
16MidfielderM. Hayashi6.5
25MidfielderA. Farmer6.7
7MidfielderJ. Grosso6.6
11ForwardN. Gomes6.81G
99ForwardJ. Huitema6.92G
24ForwardR. Gareis6.42A

Match Summary

Kansas City W defeated Chicago Red Stars W 3:0. The match was played in NWSL Women 2026. Goals were scored by T. Chawinga 22′, T. Chawinga 47′, T. Chawinga 50′. 1 yellow card was shown. Kansas City W had 47% possession while Chicago Red Stars W held 53%. Kansas City W had 18 shots (9 on target) compared to 11 (4 on target) for Chicago Red Stars W. Kansas City W made 5 substitutions, Chicago Red Stars W made 5.

Rivalry since 2021

Kansas City W vs Chicago Red Stars W Head to Head Results

17 stretnutí
Kansas City W
7
wins
Drawn
4
Chicago Red Stars W
6
wins
Total goals
63 · 3.7/match
Both scored
12/17 · 71%
Over 2.5
14/17 · 82%

Recent Form

Kansas City W

WWLWLL

Chicago Red Stars W

LLLWLL

Match Prediction

Kansas City W

45%

Home win

 

45%

Draw

Chicago Red Stars W

10%

Away win

Model advice

Winner : Kansas City W

67%Form33%
67%Attack33%
39%Defence61%
71%Head-to-head29%

Bookmaker Odds

12 bookmakers

Best price

Kansas City W

1.26

Betano

Draw

5.85

Pinnacle

Chicago Red Stars W

13.00

10Bet

Statistics are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

API data: 17 May 2026