Club Friendly — Today's Matches
Live scores, upcoming kick-offs, and finished results for today. Data refreshes automatically so you never miss a moment.
Club Friendly — Playoffs
Club Friendly — Results
The latest 25 completed matches in the Club Friendly. The highest-scoring result was Zawiercie 2–3 Kedzierzyn-Kozle. Review recent scorelines to spot form trends, home advantage patterns, and upset results that can inform your next bet.
| Home | Score | Away | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-10-19S1: 25–22S2: 25–16S3: 25–27S4: 15–25S5: 12–15FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-10-19S1: 25–17S2: 25–20S3: 25–17FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-10-18S1: 25–21S2: 22–25S3: 25–21S4: 22–25S5: 11–15FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-10-18S1: 25–21S2: 25–19S3: 19–25S4: 23–25S5: 15–9FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-10-12S1: 20–25S2: 25–22S3: 28–26S4: 22–25S5: 19–17FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-10-12S1: 25–17S2: 25–18S3: 25–17FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-10-12S1: 25–19S2: 23–25S3: 22–25S4: 25–22S5: 12–15FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-10-12S1: 23–25S2: 25–23S3: 29–27S4: 25–14FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-10-11S1: 25–19S2: 25–17S3: 25–18FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-10-11S1: 24–26S2: 25–20S3: 22–25S4: 24–26FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-10-11S1: 22–25S2: 19–25S3: 25–22S4: 25–20S5: 15–13FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-10-11S1: 21–25S2: 19–25S3: 25–20S4: 23–25FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-10-09S1: 25–21S2: 17–25S3: 25–19S4: 25–19FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-10-09S1: 16–25S2: 19–25S3: 25–22S4: 15–25FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-10-03S1: 25–22S2: 20–25S3: 25–22S4: 22–25S5: 15–12FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-10-02S1: 25–16S2: 26–24S3: 25–20FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-10-01S1: 25–18S2: 17–25S3: 25–17S4: 25–19FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-09-28S1: 18–25S2: 21–25S3: 22–25FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-09-28S1: 24–26S2: 25–16S3: 25–23S4: 25–13FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-09-27S1: 25–20S2: 22–25S3: 25–23S4: 25–20FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 – 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-09-27S1: 25–17S2: 31–29S3: 16–25S4: 15–25S5: 10–15FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-09-27S1: 27–25S2: 25–23S3: 25–22FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-09-26S1: 25–23S2: 25–19S3: 25–20FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-09-26S1: 23–25S2: 25–23S3: 25–16S4: 25–23FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 – 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025-09-26S1: 25–19S2: 25–22S3: 25–21FT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Club Friendly — Team Stats
Side-by-side performance comparison of all 65 teams in the Club Friendly. Zlin leads with 4 wins this season. The colour-coded heatmap highlights wins, losses, scoring, scoring difference, and win percentage — making it easy to spot the strongest and weakest teams at a glance for betting analysis.
Club Friendly — Betting Insights
Club Friendly 2025 — key betting statistics across 56 matches played. Games average combined scoring. Home sides win 66.1% of the time and the most common scoreline is 3-1. Use these metrics to calibrate your betting strategies.
Club Friendly — Season Trends
Season-by-season comparison across 2 seasons of the Club Friendly, with 2025 highlighted. The current season averages — combined scoring per match across 56 matches played. Columns cover home win % and away win % — use year-on-year trends to spot if the league is becoming higher or lower scoring and calibrate your betting strategy accordingly.
Top Scoring Teams
65 teams in the Club Friendly 2025 season ranked by wins. Zlin leads with 4 wins. Their 5-season average is 1.6 wins per season. Zlin shows the biggest improvement this season with 2 more wins than their past average. Compare current form against historical averages to spot rising and declining teams — useful for match result and outright winner betting.
| Team | # | Played | Won | Lost | Points For | Points Against | Avg W | Avg L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Played5 | 4 | Lost1 | Points For12 | Points Against8 | Avg W1.6 | Avg L0.4 | |
| 2 | Played3 | 3 | Lost0 | Points For7 | Points Against2 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 3 | Played3 | 3 | Lost0 | Points For9 | Points Against5 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 4 | Played4 | 3 | Lost1 | Points For9 | Points Against5 | Avg W1.0 | Avg L0.5 | |
| 5 | Played3 | 3 | Lost0 | Points For9 | Points Against5 | Avg W1.4 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 6 | Played2 | 2 | Lost0 | Points For6 | Points Against1 | Avg W1.8 | Avg L0.8 | |
| 7 | Played2 | 2 | Lost0 | Points For6 | Points Against1 | Avg W0.5 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 8 | Played2 | 2 | Lost0 | Points For6 | Points Against1 | Avg W0.5 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 9 | Played3 | 2 | Lost1 | Points For7 | Points Against4 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 10 | Played2 | 2 | Lost0 | Points For6 | Points Against4 | Avg W1.5 | Avg L1.5 | |
| 11 | Played5 | 2 | Lost3 | Points For11 | Points Against10 | Avg W1.3 | Avg L1.3 | |
| 12 | Played4 | 2 | Lost2 | Points For9 | Points Against9 | Avg W1.6 | Avg L0.8 | |
| 13 | Played1 | 1 | Lost0 | Points For3 | Points Against0 | Avg W0.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 14 | Played1 | 1 | Lost0 | Points For3 | Points Against0 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 15 | Played1 | 1 | Lost0 | Points For3 | Points Against0 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 16 | Played1 | 1 | Lost0 | Points For3 | Points Against0 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 17 | Played2 | 1 | Lost1 | Points For5 | Points Against3 | Avg W1.3 | Avg L0.3 | |
| 18 | Played2 | 1 | Lost1 | Points For5 | Points Against3 | Avg W1.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 19 | Played1 | 1 | Lost0 | Points For3 | Points Against1 | Avg W1.6 | Avg L1.6 | |
| 20 | Played1 | 1 | Lost0 | Points For3 | Points Against1 | Avg W1.5 | Avg L0.0 | |
| 21 | Played1 | 1 | Lost0 | Points For3 | Points Against1 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 22 | Played1 | 1 | Lost0 | Points For3 | Points Against1 | Avg W1.0 | Avg L0.0 | |
| 23 | Played1 | 1 | Lost0 | Points For3 | Points Against1 | Avg W0.7 | Avg L0.7 | |
| 24 | Played1 | 1 | Lost0 | Points For3 | Points Against1 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 25 | Played1 | 1 | Lost0 | Points For3 | Points Against1 | Avg W1.6 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 26 | Played1 | 1 | Lost0 | Points For3 | Points Against1 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 27 | Played1 | 1 | Lost0 | Points For3 | Points Against1 | Avg W1.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 28 | Played1 | 1 | Lost0 | Points For3 | Points Against1 | Avg W0.0 | Avg L2.0 | |
| 29 | Played1 | 1 | Lost0 | Points For3 | Points Against2 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 30 | Played1 | 1 | Lost0 | Points For3 | Points Against2 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 31 | Played1 | 1 | Lost0 | Points For3 | Points Against2 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 32 | Played1 | 1 | Lost0 | Points For3 | Points Against2 | Avg W1.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 33 | Played1 | 1 | Lost0 | Points For3 | Points Against2 | Avg W1.3 | Avg L0.3 | |
| 34 | Played1 | 1 | Lost0 | Points For3 | Points Against2 | Avg W3.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 35 | Played3 | 1 | Lost2 | Points For6 | Points Against6 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 36 | Played2 | 1 | Lost1 | Points For3 | Points Against4 | Avg W0.5 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 37 | Played2 | 1 | Lost1 | Points For3 | Points Against5 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 38 | Played4 | 1 | Lost3 | Points For4 | Points Against9 | Avg W1.3 | Avg L1.5 | |
| 39 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For2 | Points Against3 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 40 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For2 | Points Against3 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 41 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For2 | Points Against3 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 42 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For2 | Points Against3 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 43 | Played2 | 0 | Lost2 | Points For4 | Points Against6 | Avg W1.4 | Avg L0.6 | |
| 44 | Played2 | 0 | Lost2 | Points For2 | Points Against4 | Avg W0.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 45 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For1 | Points Against3 | Avg W1.0 | Avg L1.3 | |
| 46 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For1 | Points Against3 | Avg W0.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 47 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For1 | Points Against3 | Avg W1.0 | Avg L0.0 | |
| 48 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For1 | Points Against3 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 49 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For1 | Points Against3 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 50 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For1 | Points Against3 | Avg W0.7 | Avg L1.3 | |
| 51 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For1 | Points Against3 | Avg W0.5 | Avg L0.5 | |
| 52 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For1 | Points Against3 | Avg W1.0 | Avg L0.0 | |
| 53 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For1 | Points Against3 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 54 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For1 | Points Against3 | Avg W1.5 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 55 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For0 | Points Against3 | Avg W0.0 | Avg L2.0 | |
| 56 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For0 | Points Against3 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 57 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For0 | Points Against3 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 58 | Played1 | 0 | Lost1 | Points For0 | Points Against3 | Avg W— | Avg L— | |
| 59 | Played2 | 0 | Lost2 | Points For2 | Points Against6 | Avg W2.3 | Avg L0.8 | |
| 60 | Played2 | 0 | Lost2 | Points For2 | Points Against6 | Avg W0.5 | Avg L1.5 | |
| 61 | Played2 | 0 | Lost2 | Points For1 | Points Against5 | Avg W0.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 62 | Played2 | 0 | Lost2 | Points For1 | Points Against6 | Avg W0.0 | Avg L1.5 | |
| 63 | Played3 | 0 | Lost3 | Points For3 | Points Against9 | Avg W0.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 64 | Played3 | 0 | Lost3 | Points For3 | Points Against9 | Avg W2.0 | Avg L1.0 | |
| 65 | Played3 | 0 | Lost3 | Points For2 | Points Against9 | Avg W— | Avg L— |
Club Friendly — Past Seasons
Browse 8 archived seasons of the Club Friendly, from 2021 to 2025. Each season page includes full standings, top scorers, and match results — useful for comparing historical performance and identifying long-term betting patterns.
History 17 Jan 2025
Club Friendly matches represent a longstanding tradition in professional volleyball, originating from the need for clubs to prepare for major competitions and maintain playing rhythm during off-season periods. Unlike formal league competitions, friendly matches operate without official standings or championship aspirations, allowing clubs complete flexibility in scheduling and squad rotation. The format has evolved significantly since the early days of professional volleyball, becoming increasingly important as clubs seek international exposure and competitive testing against foreign opponents. Modern Club Friendly fixtures now attract significant attention from betting markets and sports analytics platforms, with matches tracked globally across multiple countries and continents, reflecting the sport's growing professionalization and international interconnectedness.
- —1950s — Professional volleyball clubs begin organizing international friendly matches for pre-season preparation
- —1980s — Expansion of international club competitions increases demand for quality friendly fixtures
- —2000s — Betting platforms and sports data aggregators begin systematically tracking Club Friendly results globally
- —2010s — Development of comprehensive statistics platforms provides detailed analysis of friendly match performance
- —2020s — Club Friendly becomes integral to modern professional volleyball calendar with matches tracked across 40+ countries
Competition Format 17 Jan 2025
Club Friendly matches operate under standard international volleyball rules established by FIVB (Fédération Internationale de Volleyball), featuring best-of-five set competition with matches played to 25 points per set (first four sets) and 15 points in the deciding fifth set. Teams earn three points for a match victory and zero for a loss, though no official league standings or championship title exists. The format prioritizes competitive testing and squad development over championship ambitions, allowing clubs to rotate players freely and experiment with tactical approaches. Matches are scheduled independently by clubs or through international tournament organizers, with no formal promotion, relegation, or playoff mechanisms involved.
Records 17 Jan 2025
Club Friendly as a non-competitive format does not maintain official championship records, though individual match performances and club win-loss statistics are tracked by sports data platforms.
Analysis 17 Jan 2025
Current Season Analysis
The 2024/25 Club Friendly season demonstrates remarkable diversity in international club participation, with 37 professional teams from across Europe, Asia, and beyond competing in exhibition fixtures. Zlin leads the current standings with an impressive 4–1 record (8 points) and a ++4 goal, establishing themselves as one of the season's standout performers. Close behind, Liberec, Shanghai, VK Lvi Prague, and Kedzierzyn-Kozle each maintain perfect or near-perfect records, all with 6 points and strong goal differentials, indicating a highly competitive field of elite clubs.
The season showcases the format's growing global reach, with traditional European powerhouses from Czech Republic, Poland, and Austria competing alongside emerging Chinese clubs like Shanghai and Zhejiang. Turkish clubs including Fenerbahce, Galatasaray, and Bursa demonstrate the sport's expansion into new markets, while Hungarian, Bulgarian, Serbian, and Baltic representatives round out a truly international competition. This geographic diversity reflects volleyball's professionalization and the increasing commercial importance of inter-club competition beyond official league structures.
Ostrava presents an interesting mid-table case study with 5 matches played but only 2 wins (4 points), suggesting inconsistency despite significant playing time. Conversely, teams like Bedzin and Waldviertel have maximized their limited fixture opportunities, winning both matches played and maintaining exceptional goal differentials (+5). This pattern highlights a key characteristic of Club Friendly: clubs participate on flexible schedules based on their preparation needs, creating variable match counts and making form analysis complex.
The competitive balance across the standings is striking—numerous clubs cluster around the 2–4 point mark despite differing numbers of matches played, indicating that no single dominant force has emerged. This parity suggests that Club Friendly, despite its non-competitive nature, attracts serious competitive engagement from participating clubs, who view these fixtures as essential preparation for official competitions including the CEV Champions League and national championship finals.
Global Competitive Significance and Market Impact
Club Friendly has evolved from informal inter-club exhibitions into a systematically tracked, globally distributed volleyball format with significant betting and analytical infrastructure. The inclusion of 37+ clubs across 15+ countries in the 2024/25 season reflects professional volleyball's increasing internationalization, where clubs no longer rely solely on domestic league competition for preparation and development. Zlin's early-season dominance and the strong performances from Liberec and Shanghai demonstrate that success in Club Friendly requires sustained competitive excellence, contradicting the notion that friendly matches lack intensity or importance.
The format's appeal to betting markets and sports analytics platforms underscores its commercial viability. With live scores tracked on Betmana, Flashscore, and other major platforms across 40+ countries, Club Friendly generates significant wagering activity and audience engagement. This commercial infrastructure has transformed what was historically an informal preparation mechanism into a recognized global competition, complete with standings, statistics, and analytical coverage comparable to official league competitions.
Seasonal Participation Patterns and Squad Development
The variable match counts across teams (ranging from 1 to 5 matches played) reveal Club Friendly's flexible nature and its role in club-specific preparation calendars. Ostrava and Zlin have played the most matches (5 each), suggesting these Czech clubs have prioritized international exposure and competitive testing. Conversely, numerous clubs have played only 1–2 matches, indicating participation based on specific preparation windows or tournament invitations rather than a fixed league schedule. This flexibility allows clubs to integrate Club Friendly fixtures strategically into their broader competitive calendars, using friendly matches to address specific squad development needs.
The presence of emerging Asian clubs like Shanghai, Zhejiang, and Tianjin demonstrates Club Friendly's role in facilitating cross-continental club competition. These Chinese teams' participation alongside established European powerhouses creates a unique competitive laboratory where clubs from different volleyball cultures test themselves against international opposition. This cross-pollination of playing styles and competitive approaches enhances the sport's global development and provides valuable preparation for international club competitions like the Asian Club Championship and potential intercontinental fixtures.
Regional Powerhouses and Emerging Trends
Central European clubs, particularly from Czech Republic and Poland, dominate the current standings, with Zlin, Liberec, VK Lvi Prague, Kedzierzyn-Kozle, Ostrava, Zawiercie, and Lublin all featuring prominently. This regional concentration reflects the strength of Central European volleyball infrastructure and the region's tradition of elite club competition. Polish clubs, in particular, benefit from the PlusLiga—one of Europe's strongest domestic leagues—and use Club Friendly fixtures to maintain competitive edge and test tactics ahead of European competition.
Turkish clubs' participation, including Fenerbahce, Galatasaray, Bursa, Gebze, Alanya Bld, and Ziraat Bankasi, signals the growing importance of Turkish volleyball in the international club landscape. These clubs compete in a highly competitive domestic league and increasingly seek international exposure through friendly matches. The presence of Al Hilal and Jakarta Bhayangkara from Asia, alongside Baltic representatives like BIGBANK Tartu and Daugavpils/Ezerzeme, indicates Club Friendly's truly global reach and its role as a connector for professional volleyball clubs across continents.
Competitive Quality and Match Intensity
Despite its non-competitive, non-championship status, Club Friendly matches demonstrate genuine competitive intensity. The tight goal differentials among many top-ranked teams (+4 to +5) and the presence of teams with perfect or near-perfect records suggest that participating clubs approach these fixtures with serious preparation and tactical focus. Liberec's perfect 3–0 record with a +5 goal differential and Shanghai's identical record indicate sustained excellence across multiple matches, not isolated performances. This consistency demonstrates that Club Friendly success requires genuine competitive quality and team preparation.
The format's role in the professional volleyball calendar has become increasingly important as clubs seek competitive testing beyond their domestic leagues. For clubs competing in European competitions, Club Friendly provides opportunities to face opponents from different tactical systems and playing styles. For clubs from emerging volleyball markets, participation in Club Friendly alongside established European powerhouses provides invaluable competitive development and international exposure that accelerates player and team development.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Club Friendly volleyball?
Club Friendly is a non-competitive international volleyball format featuring exhibition matches between professional clubs. Unlike official leagues, friendly matches have no championship title, promotion/relegation, or formal standings—they serve purely as preparation and competitive testing for clubs.
How many teams participate in Club Friendly?
Over 37 professional clubs from multiple countries participate in Club Friendly matches during the 2024/25 season, including teams from Czech Republic, Poland, China, Turkey, Italy, Hungary, and many other nations across Europe and Asia.
Where are Club Friendly matches tracked?
Club Friendly results and statistics are tracked on major sports platforms including Betmana, Flashscore, 365Scores, and Volleyball World, with live scores available across 40+ countries globally.
How does Club Friendly scoring work?
Club Friendly matches follow FIVB rules with teams earning 3 points for a match victory and 0 points for a loss. Matches are best-of-five sets, with first four sets played to 25 points and the deciding fifth set to 15 points.
Why do clubs play in Club Friendly matches?
Clubs use Club Friendly fixtures for pre-season preparation, squad development, tactical experimentation, and maintaining match fitness. These non-competitive matches allow teams to test new players and strategies without championship pressure.
Is there a Club Friendly championship or title?
No. Club Friendly is not a competitive league format—there is no championship title, official standings, or championship winner. It exists purely as a platform for inter-club exhibition matches and preparation.
API data: 1 May 2026 · Stats updated: 21 Apr 2026 · Content updated: 17 Jan 2025